Impacts of a Report-back Training Program
Expanding Effective Report-back of Environmental Exposures Among New Researchers
1 other identifier
interventional
56
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Researchers participate in a hands-on training program on returning personal exposure results, and pre- and post-tests assess outcomes shifts in knowledge and perspectives on its value, and willingness to implement report-back in current or future studies.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 22, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 13, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 21, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 15, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 15, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 7, 2026
CompletedMay 7, 2026
April 1, 2026
1.5 years
July 13, 2023
January 30, 2026
May 5, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Beliefs About Report-back, Before and After Training Program
Participants ranked how strongly they agreed with each statement using a Likert-scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).
Participants completed surveys before and after the training program.
Concern About Report-back, Before and After Training Program
Participants ranked how strongly they agreed with each of 3 statements about concerns about report-back using a Likert-scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Responses were summed together to calculate sum concern (3-15). Higher values indicate greater concern about report-back so a higher post-test score would indicate a worse outcome (i.e., that concern about report-back increased as a result of the training program.
Participants completed surveys before and after the single-day training program.
Perceived Benefits of Report-back, Before and After Training Program
Participants ranked how strongly they agreed with each of 5 statements about perceived benefits of report-back using a Likert-scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Responses were summed together to calculate sum perceived benefits (5-25). Higher values indicate stronger agreement with perceived benefits, so a higher post-test score would indicate a better outcome (i.e., that perceived benefits of report-back increased as a result of the training program).
Participants completed surveys before and after the single-day training program.
Study Arms (1)
Report-back training program
OTHERResearchers participate in a training program on sharing personal results. Pre-and post-tests are administered to evaluate shifts in perspectives and wiliness to report-back before and after the training program. There is no control group.
Interventions
Researchers participate in a report-back training program to evaluate potential impacts on knowledge and future behaviors with respect to sharing personal exposure results with study participants.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Must be affiliated with a study that collects biomonitoring or personal exposure data
You may not qualify if:
- Under 18
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Virtual and in-person across the U.S.
Newton, Massachusetts, 024600000, United States
Limitations and Caveats
Individuals who participated in the workshop skewed towards having an interest in report-back and being more familiar with its benefits
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Jennifer Liss Ohayon
- Organization
- Silent Spring Institute
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Scientist
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 13, 2023
First Posted
September 21, 2023
Study Start
June 22, 2023
Primary Completion
December 15, 2024
Study Completion
December 15, 2024
Last Updated
May 7, 2026
Results First Posted
May 7, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share