NCT06046872

Brief Summary

Researchers participate in a hands-on training program on returning personal exposure results, and pre- and post-tests assess outcomes shifts in knowledge and perspectives on its value, and willingness to implement report-back in current or future studies.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
56

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 22, 2023

Completed
21 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 13, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 21, 2023

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 15, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 15, 2024

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 7, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

May 7, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

July 13, 2023

Results QC Date

January 30, 2026

Last Update Submit

May 5, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Beliefs About Report-back, Before and After Training Program

    Participants ranked how strongly they agreed with each statement using a Likert-scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).

    Participants completed surveys before and after the training program.

  • Concern About Report-back, Before and After Training Program

    Participants ranked how strongly they agreed with each of 3 statements about concerns about report-back using a Likert-scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Responses were summed together to calculate sum concern (3-15). Higher values indicate greater concern about report-back so a higher post-test score would indicate a worse outcome (i.e., that concern about report-back increased as a result of the training program.

    Participants completed surveys before and after the single-day training program.

  • Perceived Benefits of Report-back, Before and After Training Program

    Participants ranked how strongly they agreed with each of 5 statements about perceived benefits of report-back using a Likert-scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Responses were summed together to calculate sum perceived benefits (5-25). Higher values indicate stronger agreement with perceived benefits, so a higher post-test score would indicate a better outcome (i.e., that perceived benefits of report-back increased as a result of the training program).

    Participants completed surveys before and after the single-day training program.

Study Arms (1)

Report-back training program

OTHER

Researchers participate in a training program on sharing personal results. Pre-and post-tests are administered to evaluate shifts in perspectives and wiliness to report-back before and after the training program. There is no control group.

Behavioral: Report-back training

Interventions

Researchers participate in a report-back training program to evaluate potential impacts on knowledge and future behaviors with respect to sharing personal exposure results with study participants.

Report-back training program

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Must be affiliated with a study that collects biomonitoring or personal exposure data

You may not qualify if:

  • Under 18

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Virtual and in-person across the U.S.

Newton, Massachusetts, 024600000, United States

Location

Limitations and Caveats

Individuals who participated in the workshop skewed towards having an interest in report-back and being more familiar with its benefits

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Jennifer Liss Ohayon
Organization
Silent Spring Institute

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Research Scientist

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 13, 2023

First Posted

September 21, 2023

Study Start

June 22, 2023

Primary Completion

December 15, 2024

Study Completion

December 15, 2024

Last Updated

May 7, 2026

Results First Posted

May 7, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations