Comparing the Effectiveness of Virtual Reality in Paediatric Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To the best of our knowledge,the investigators found only a study using VR in reducing preoperative anxiety in paediatric population. Ryu et al found that children who received preoperative VR tour of the operation theatre had perfect score in induction compliance checklist (ICC). With these encouraging data,the investigators decide to conduct a study to determine whether the use of cartoon video VR headset during induction of anaesthesia is able to reduce preoperative anxiety and increase compliance during inhalation induction in children undergoing surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2020
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 18, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 21, 2023
CompletedSeptember 21, 2023
September 1, 2023
1 year
July 18, 2021
September 12, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Compare Effectiveness of Virtual reality intervention versus standard care in reducing anxiety in paediatric patients undergoing inhalation induction
Primary objective is to compare effectiveness of virtual reality ( VR) intervention versus standard care in reducing anxiety of paediatric patients undergoing inhalation induction of anaesthesia by using the induction compliance checklist and compare with their mYPAS score. If the mYPAS score is high in Virtual Reality arm, however, Induction Compliance checklist is perfect score, hence we can conclude that VR arm patient have benefitted from the use of VR in reducing preoperative anxiety.
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Secondary objective is to investigate system usability of using virtual reality in inducing paediatric patients.
1 year
Study Arms (2)
Control Arm( Arm1)
NO INTERVENTIONArm1 which is standard care/control group (as per usual practice). May use the distraction, Parental presence, or with musics, soft prep talks, distractions with toys, as per anaesthetist's usual practice. Patients will receive 100% oxygen of 6 L/min flow for 30 seconds. Nitrous oxide of 2 L/min will be added with ratio oxygen and nitrous oxide of 3:1. Sevoflurane inhalation will be initiated with 4% concentration for 30 seconds, followed by 8%. The induction will be proceeded in usual manner
VR ( Virtual Reality) ( Arm2)
EXPERIMENTALGroup 2 patients will choose one of the three YouTube videos, either Frozen theme song, SpongeBob or Minions according to their preference. The selected video will be played on the doctor's handphone and slotted into the VR headset.A handphone playing YouTube videos (either Frozen or SpongeBob or Minions VR cartoons) will be slotted into the VR headset prior to applying on the patient. They will have mask on first followed by the VR headset. Patients will receive 100% oxygen of 6 L/min flow for 30 seconds. Nitrous oxide of 2 L/min will be added with ratio oxygen and nitrous oxide of 3:1. Sevoflurane inhalation will be initiated with 4% concentration for 30 seconds, followed by 8%. The induction will be proceeded in usual manner
Interventions
Non immersive VR experience basically means providing a near reality environment for viewers, however, viewers won't be able to make any changes to it as they can only watch. This Non-immersive Virtual reality experience will be applied unto the child by using a headset that incorporates a computerized dimensional environment which will be simulated to make the child feel near reality .The VR headset consist of a cover for handphone slot, screen display, two lenses with adjustable eye pieces to focus, foam padding and adjustable elastic head mount strap.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I or II patients.
- Patients between 4-12 years of age.
- Elective and emergency cases
You may not qualify if:
- Maxillofacial anomalies
- Skull anomalies that make fitting mask difficult
- Visual and hearing impairment
- Epilepsy
- Contraindication to nitrous oxide and sevoflurane inhalation induction. For example; malignant hyperthermia, ear surgery and pneumothorax.
- Autism spectrum disorder
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, 56000, Malaysia
Related Publications (5)
Ryu JH, Park SJ, Park JW, Kim JW, Yoo HJ, Kim TW, Hong JS, Han SH. Randomized clinical trial of immersive virtual reality tour of the operating theatre in children before anaesthesia. Br J Surg. 2017 Nov;104(12):1628-1633. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10684. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
PMID: 28975600BACKGROUNDMifflin KA, Hackmann T, Chorney JM. Streamed video clips to reduce anxiety in children during inhaled induction of anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2012 Nov;115(5):1162-7. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31824d5224. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
PMID: 23051880BACKGROUNDKain ZN, Wang SM, Mayes LC, Caramico LA, Hofstadter MB. Distress during the induction of anesthesia and postoperative behavioral outcomes. Anesth Analg. 1999 May;88(5):1042-7. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199905000-00013.
PMID: 10320165BACKGROUNDKerimoglu B, Neuman A, Paul J, Stefanov DG, Twersky R. Anesthesia induction using video glasses as a distraction tool for the management of preoperative anxiety in children. Anesth Analg. 2013 Dec;117(6):1373-9. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182a8c18f.
PMID: 24257388BACKGROUNDMalloy KM, Milling LS. The effectiveness of virtual reality distraction for pain reduction: a systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Dec;30(8):1011-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.07.001. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
PMID: 20691523BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Maryam Budiman
Universiti Kebansaan Malaysia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Masking of parents and patients, until entering the operation theatre
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 18, 2021
First Posted
September 21, 2023
Study Start
December 1, 2020
Primary Completion
December 1, 2021
Study Completion
December 1, 2021
Last Updated
September 21, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-09