Barbed Suture vs Non-Barbed Closure for Emergency Exploratory Laparotomy RCT
Incisional Surgical Site Infection and Fascial Dehiscence After Abdominal Fascial Closure With Triclosan-Coated Barbed Suture vs Polydioxanone Suture After Emergency Exploratory Laparotomy: A Randomized Control Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
250
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized control trial aims to compare the efficacy of triclosan-coated barbed suture (TCB) versus conventional non-barbed polydioxanone (PDS) suture in the closure of the abdominal fascia after emergency exploratory laparotomy. The study addresses the common complications of incisional surgical site infections (SSI) and fascial dehiscence (FD) following emergency exploratory laparotomy. The primary objective is to assess the effectiveness of triclosan-coated barbed suture and conventional non-barbed suture in reducing the rates of incisional SSI and FD within 30 days postoperatively. The study population comprises adult patients undergoing emergent laparotomy for traumatic injuries or acute intraabdominal pathology. This prospective, single-blinded randomized control trial will be conducted at Los Angeles General Medical Center. Patients will be randomized to receive either triclosan-coated barbed suture or conventional non-barbed suture for abdominal fascial closure, with a standard closure technique employed. Patients will be followed up for 30 days postoperatively to monitor surgical site infections, fascial dehiscence, and other outcomes. Statistical analysis will be conducted to compare outcomes between the study arms, assessing the efficacy of triclosan-coated barbed suture in reducing the incidence of SSI and FD, along with secondary outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 12, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 21, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 31, 2027
November 28, 2023
November 1, 2023
2.7 years
September 12, 2023
November 27, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Wound Complication events
Composite incidence of superficial surgical site infections and abdominal fascial dehiscence
30 days postoperatively
Surgical Site Infection Incidence
Incidence of superficial surgical site infections
30 days postoperatively
Fascial Dehiscence Incidence
Incidence of fascial dehiscence with or without evisceration of abdominal contents
30 days postoperatively
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Hospital Length of Stay
90 days postoperatively
ICU Length of Stay
90 days postoperatively
Incidence of Unplanned Reoperation
30 days postoperatively
Incidence of Prolonged Postoperative Antibiotics
30 days postoperatively
Study Arms (2)
Triclosan-coated barbed suture group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe active arm of the study will including patients randomized to abdominal fascial closure with using triclosan-coated barbed (STRATAFIX™ Symmetric PDS™, Johnson \& Johnson) suture after emergency exploratory laparotomy.
Non-barbed suture group
PLACEBO COMPARATORThe control arm of the study will including patients randomized to abdominal fascial closure with using non-barbed triclosan-coated suture(PDS™ Plus, Johnson \& Johnson) or non-coated polydioxanone (PDS™ II,Johnson \& Johnson) suture after emergency exploratory laparotomy.
Interventions
STRATAFIX™ Symmetric PDS™ (Johnson \& Johnson) triclosan-coated polydioxanone barbed suture caliber 0 or 1 will be the standardized suture used for abdominal fascial closure in patients randomized to the treatment group. STRATAFIX™ Symmetric PDS™ is an FDA approved sterile, synthetic, absorbable, barbed triclosan-coated polydioxanone suture. Its indications for use include soft tissue approximation where absorbable suture is appropriate.
PDS™ Plus (Johnson \& Johnson) non-barbed triclosan-coated polydioxanone suture in either 0 or 1 caliber will be used for abdominal fascial closure in patients randomized to the control group. PDS™ Plus is an FDA approved sterile, synthetic, absorbable, triclosan-coated surgical monofilament suture prepared from the polyester, poly(p-dioxanone). Its indications for use include soft tissue approximation where absorbable suture is appropriate.
PDS™ II (Johnson \& Johnson) non-barbed non-coated polydioxanone suture in either 0 or 1 caliber will be used for abdominal fascial closure in patients randomized to the control group. PDS™ II is a FDA approved sterile, synthetic, absorbable, surgical monofilament suture prepared from the polyester, polyester, poly(p-dioxanone) indicated for use in soft tissue approximation where absorbable suture is appropriate.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All adult individuals aged 18 years or older who undergo emergent laparotomy via a midline approach for trauma or non-trauma emergency general surgery who undergo complete fascial closure at the time of the index laparotomy operation.
- Individuals with CDC Class I, II, III and IV type surgical wounds
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals under 18 years of age
- Individuals with known immune deficiencies
- Individuals taking chronic immunosuppressive medications
- Individuals presenting with nosocomial infections
- Individuals presenting with pre-existing abdominal wall hernia
- Individuals requiring multiple operations for sequential fascial closure
- Individuals incarcerated at time of operation
- Individuals with known preexisting connective tissue disease
- Individuals with known preexisting ventral abdominal wall hernia
- Individuals who are pregnant time of operation
- Individuals who are deceased prior to conclusion of exploratory laparotomy
- Individuals lost to follow-up or deceased during the first 30 days after laparotomy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Los Angeles General Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90033, United States
Related Publications (7)
Ruiz-Tovar J, Llavero C, Jimenez-Fuertes M, Duran M, Perez-Lopez M, Garcia-Marin A. Incisional Surgical Site Infection after Abdominal Fascial Closure with Triclosan-Coated Barbed Suture vs Triclosan-Coated Polydioxanone Loop Suture vs Polydioxanone Loop Suture in Emergent Abdominal Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2020 May;230(5):766-774. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.02.031. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
PMID: 32113031BACKGROUNDRuiz-Tovar J, Alonso N, Morales V, Llavero C. Association between Triclosan-Coated Sutures for Abdominal Wall Closure and Incisional Surgical Site Infection after Open Surgery in Patients Presenting with Fecal Peritonitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2015 Oct;16(5):588-94. doi: 10.1089/sur.2014.072. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
PMID: 26171624BACKGROUNDMangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR. Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control. 1999 Apr;27(2):97-132; quiz 133-4; discussion 96.
PMID: 10196487BACKGROUNDWalming S, Angenete E, Block M, Bock D, Gessler B, Haglind E. Retrospective review of risk factors for surgical wound dehiscence and incisional hernia. BMC Surg. 2017 Feb 22;17(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0207-0.
PMID: 28222776BACKGROUNDMillbourn D, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Effect of stitch length on wound complications after closure of midline incisions: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg. 2009 Nov;144(11):1056-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.189.
PMID: 19917943BACKGROUNDPatel SV, Paskar DD, Nelson RL, Vedula SS, Steele SR. Closure methods for laparotomy incisions for preventing incisional hernias and other wound complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 3;11(11):CD005661. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005661.pub2.
PMID: 29099149BACKGROUNDde Jonge SW, Atema JJ, Solomkin JS, Boermeester MA. Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of triclosan-coated sutures for the prevention of surgical-site infection. Br J Surg. 2017 Jan;104(2):e118-e133. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10445. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
PMID: 28093723BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Matthew Martin, MD
Los Angeles General Medical Center
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER
- Masking Details
- The operative team will be blinded to the assigned treatment group until the patient's edibility is confirmed immediately prior to abdominal fascial closure. Once eligibility is confirmed the surgical team will be unblinded in order to proceed with abdominal fascia closure according to the assigned treatment group.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor of Surgery, Director of Acute Care Surgery Research
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 12, 2023
First Posted
September 21, 2023
Study Start
January 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 31, 2027
Last Updated
November 28, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Patient data will not be shared with other researchers.