Efficacy of Metacognitive Training in Older Adults With Depression
Assessing the Efficacy of Metacognitive Training on Depressive Symptoms, Dysfunctional Attitudes and Metacognition in Older Adults Diagnosed With Depression
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Effective pharmacological and psychological treatments for depression are available. However, treatment modalities are not accessible to all patients diagnosed with depression. Furthermore, some individuals who access treatment drop out and relapse after treatment. Improving treatment modalities for depression is important given the rates of individuals diagnosed worldwide, and rather than developing new treatments, there is a need to explore how existing treatment modalities can be improved and implemented in a simpler and more cost-effective way. To address this need, Metacognitive Training for Depression (DMCT) was developed as a low-cost, easy-to-implement, cognitive behavioral therapy-based group intervention. The aim of Metacognitive Training is to reduce depressive symptoms by working with the patient's cognitive biases from a metacognitive perspective. The effectiveness of this method, which has been proven effective by studies in the literature, is presented with a pilot study on older adults in 2018. Since the studies evaluating the effectiveness of the Metacognitive Training-Silver program are limited and it has not yet been adapted to Turkish culture, this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Metacognitive Training-Silver program in older adults diagnosed with depression.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 15, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 15, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 18, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 30, 2024
CompletedAugust 26, 2025
August 1, 2025
1.1 years
August 15, 2023
August 20, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (12)
Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI): Time 1
The purpose of the inventory, developed by Aaron T. Beck et al. in 1978, is to measure the severity and change of depressive symptoms in the individual. The Turkish validity and reliability study was carried out by Hisli Şahin. The scale provides a 4-point Likert-type measurement consisting of 21 items. In the scale, the individual is asked to indicate how he or she has felt in the last week. The high score obtained from the scale shows a high level of depression. (Hisli 1989a; Hisli 1989b). The BDI will be used at the beginning of the Metacognitive Training-Silver.
BDI will be applied on the first day of Metacognitive Training-Silver to both groups.
Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI): Time 2
The purpose of the inventory, developed by Aaron T. Beck et al. in 1978, is to measure the severity and change of depressive symptoms in the individual. The Turkish validity and reliability study was carried out by Hisli Şahin. The scale provides a 4-point Likert-type measurement consisting of 21 items. In the scale, the individual is asked to indicate how he or she has felt in the last week. The high score obtained from the scale shows a high level of depression. (Hisli 1989a; Hisli 1989b). The BDI will be used at the end of the Metacognitive Training-Silver.
BDI will be applied after the 8 sessions of Metacognitive Training-Silver completed to both groups. The training will be completed in 8 weeks.
Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI): Time 3
The purpose of the inventory, developed by Aaron T. Beck et al. in 1978, is to measure the severity and change of depressive symptoms in the individual. The Turkish validity and reliability study was carried out by Hisli Şahin. The scale provides a 4-point Likert-type measurement consisting of 21 items. In the scale, the individual is asked to indicate how he or she has felt in the last week. The high score obtained from the scale shows a high level of depression. (Hisli 1989a; Hisli 1989b). The BDI will be used for follow-up evaluation up to 3 months after the final program.
BDI will be reapplied for a follow up evaluation, up to 3 months after the final program, in both groups.
Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (Revised and Abbreviated Turkish Version- DAS-R-TR): Time 1
It was developed by Weissman and Beck (1987) as A and B forms, each consisting of 40 items, in order to detect intermediate beliefs that cause depression or anxiety in individuals and to learn their frequency (Weissman and Beck, 1978). However, the validity and reliability study of the revised and abbreviated version of the form was conducted by Batmaz and Özdel (2016) in order to be more useful for practitioners and those who filled out the scale. The scale, which consists of 13 items in the 7-Likert type, has two sub-dimensions as "Perfectionism/Achievement" (first 8 items) and "Need for Approval/Dependency" (last 5 items). If the total scores obtained are high, it indicates that individuals have more dysfunctional attitudes (Batmaz and Özdel, 2016). The DAS-R-TR will be used at the beginning of the Metacognitive Training-Silver.
DAS-R-TR will be applied on the first day of Metacognitive Training-Silver to both groups.
Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (Revised and Abbreviated Turkish Version- DAS-R-TR): Time 2
It was developed by Weissman and Beck (1987) as A and B forms, each consisting of 40 items, in order to detect intermediate beliefs that cause depression or anxiety in individuals and to learn their frequency (Weissman and Beck, 1978). However, the validity and reliability study of the revised and abbreviated version of the form was conducted by Batmaz and Özdel (2016) in order to be more useful for practitioners and those who filled out the scale. The scale, which consists of 13 items in the 7-Likert type, has two sub-dimensions as "Perfectionism/Achievement" (first 8 items) and "Need for Approval/Dependency" (last 5 items). If the total scores obtained are high, it indicates that individuals have more dysfunctional attitudes (Batmaz and Özdel, 2016). The DAS-R-TR will be used at the end of the Metacognitive Training-Silver.
DAS-R-TR will be applied after the 8 sessions of Metacognitive Training-Silver completed to both groups. The training will be completed in 8 weeks.
Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (Revised and Abbreviated Turkish Version- DAS-R-TR): Time 3
It was developed by Weissman and Beck (1987) as A and B forms, each consisting of 40 items, in order to detect intermediate beliefs that cause depression or anxiety in individuals and to learn their frequency (Weissman and Beck, 1978). However, the validity and reliability study of the revised and abbreviated version of the form was conducted by Batmaz and Özdel (2016) in order to be more useful for practitioners and those who filled out the scale. The scale, which consists of 13 items in the 7-Likert type, has two sub-dimensions as "Perfectionism/Achievement" (first 8 items) and "Need for Approval/Dependency" (last 5 items). If the total scores obtained are high, it indicates that individuals have more dysfunctional attitudes (Batmaz and Özdel, 2016). The DAS-R-TR will be used for follow-up evaluation up to 3 months after the final program.
DAS-R-TR will be reapplied for a follow up evaluation, up to 3 months after the final program, in both groups.
Metacognition Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30): Time 1
The MCQ-30 assesses individual differences in unhelpful metacognitions which may contribute to obsessive and compulsive symptoms, pathological worry, and underpin trait anxiety. The scale was developed based on the metacognitive model by Cartwright-Hatton \& Wells (65 items, 1997) and was shortened by Wells \& Cartwright-Hatton (30 items, 2004). The Turkish study was carried out by Yılmaz et al. and Tosun \& Irak in 2008 (Yılmaz et al., 2008; Tosun and Irak, 2008). According to the study of Tosun \& Irak (2008), a 4-point Likert-type scale consists five sub-dimensions: (Lack of) Cognitive Confidence, Positive Beliefs about Worry, Cognitive Self-Consciousness, Negative Beliefs about Uncontrollability and Danger, and Need to Control Thoughts. An increase in the score indicates an increase in pathological metacognitive activity (Tosun \& Irak, 2008). The MCQ-30 will be used at the beginning of the Metacognitive Training-Silver.
MCQ-30 will be applied on the first day of Metacognitive Training-Silver to both groups.
Metacognition Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30): Time 2
The MCQ-30 assesses individual differences in unhelpful metacognitions which may contribute to obsessive and compulsive symptoms, pathological worry, and underpin trait anxiety. The scale was developed based on the metacognitive model by Cartwright-Hatton \& Wells (65 items, 1997) and was shortened by Wells \& Cartwright-Hatton (30 items, 2004). The Turkish study was carried out by Yılmaz et al. and Tosun \& Irak in 2008 (Yılmaz et al., 2008; Tosun and Irak, 2008). According to the study of Tosun \& Irak (2008), a 4-point Likert-type scale consists five sub-dimensions: (Lack of) Cognitive Confidence, Positive Beliefs about Worry, Cognitive Self-Consciousness, Negative Beliefs about Uncontrollability and Danger, and Need to Control Thoughts. An increase in the score indicates an increase in pathological metacognitive activity (Tosun \& Irak, 2008). The MCQ-30 will be used at the end of the Metacognitive Training-Silver.
MCQ-30 will be applied after the 8 sessions of Metacognitive Training-Silver completed to both groups. The training will be completed in 8 weeks.
Metacognition Questionnaire-30 (MCQ-30): Time 3
The MCQ-30 assesses individual differences in unhelpful metacognitions which may contribute to obsessive and compulsive symptoms, pathological worry, and underpin trait anxiety. The scale was developed based on the metacognitive model by Cartwright-Hatton \& Wells (65 items, 1997) and was shortened by Wells \& Cartwright-Hatton (30 items, 2004). The Turkish study was carried out by Yılmaz et al. and Tosun \& Irak in 2008 (Yılmaz et al., 2008; Tosun and Irak, 2008). According to the study of Tosun \& Irak (2008), a 4-point Likert-type scale consists five sub-dimensions: (Lack of) Cognitive Confidence, Positive Beliefs about Worry, Cognitive Self-Consciousness, Negative Beliefs about Uncontrollability and Danger, and Need to Control Thoughts. An increase in the score indicates an increase in pathological metacognitive activity (Tosun \& Irak, 2008). The MCQ-30 will be used for follow-up evaluation up to 3 months after the final program.
MCQ-30 will be applied on the first day of Metacognitive Training-Silver to both groups.
The WHO-Europe Attitudes of Aging Questionnaire (EAAQ): Time 1
The attitudes to ageing questionnaire was developed to provide a standard way of measuring attitudes to ageing from the perspective of older people. The scale was developed within the scope of a multi-center project supported by the EU 5th Framework Program to determine the perception level to aging of elderly. The Turkish adaptation and psychometric properties of the scale were studied by Eser et al. in 2011. The scale is a 5-point Likert-type scale consisting of three sub-dimensions (Psychosocial Loss; Physical Change and Psychological Growth) and a total of 24 items. As the total score of the scale increases, the attitude towards the related dimension also increases positively. (Eser et al. 2011). The EAAQ will be used at the beginning of the Metacognitive Training-Silver.
EAAQ will be applied on the first day of Metacognitive Training-Silver to both groups.
The WHO-Europe Attitudes of Aging Questionnaire (EAAQ): Time 2
The attitudes to ageing questionnaire was developed to provide a standard way of measuring attitudes to ageing from the perspective of older people. The scale was developed within the scope of a multi-center project supported by the EU 5th Framework Program to determine the perception level to aging of elderly. The Turkish adaptation and psychometric properties of the scale were studied by Eser et al. in 2011. The scale is a 5-point Likert-type scale consisting of three sub-dimensions (Psychosocial Loss; Physical Change and Psychological Growth) and a total of 24 items. As the total score of the scale increases, the attitude towards the related dimension also increases positively. (Eser et al. 2011). The EAAQ will be used at the end of the Metacognitive Training-Silver.
EAAQ will be applied after the 8 sessions of Metacognitive Training-Silver completed to both groups. The training will be completed in 8 weeks.
The WHO-Europe Attitudes of Aging Questionnaire (EAAQ): Time 3
The attitudes to ageing questionnaire was developed to provide a standard way of measuring attitudes to ageing from the perspective of older people. The scale was developed within the scope of a multi-center project supported by the EU 5th Framework Program to determine the perception level to aging of elderly. The Turkish adaptation and psychometric properties of the scale were studied by Eser et al. in 2011. The scale is a 5-point Likert-type scale consisting of three sub-dimensions (Psychosocial Loss; Physical Change and Psychological Growth) and a total of 24 items. As the total score of the scale increases, the attitude towards the related dimension also increases positively. (Eser et al. 2011). The EAAQ will be used for follow-up evaluation up to 3 months after the final program.
EAAQ will be applied on the first day of Metacognitive Training-Silver to both groups.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Personal Information Form (Sociodemographic Characteristics and Clinical Data)
Personal Information Form will be applied on the first day of the first session of Metacognitive Training-Silver on both groups.
Study Arms (2)
Intervention Group
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group will have Metacognitive Training-Silver program. Metacognitive Training-Silver program is an eight-module training that focuses on common cognitive problems and dysfunctional attitudes, beliefs and prejudices in solving problems seen in depression. The purpose of the sessions is to convey information about false beliefs and cognitive distortions, and to help sick individuals think critically, convey their thoughts, and acquire new problem-solving strategies through exercises.
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONAll participants in the control group will continue the treatment process determined in the routine. In this process, the patient participates in counseling and/or psychotherapy, ECT (electroconvulsive therapy) sessions, and psychopharmacological drugs. The control group will not participate in the Metacognitive Training-Silver program, an interview consisting of one session is planned considering for the placebo effect. At the end of the study, the Metacognitive Training-Silver program will be carried out with the voluntary participants in the control group, taking into account the ethics.
Interventions
The Metacognitive Training-Silver program includes the following topics: Thinking and Reasoning 1 (module 1), Memory (module 2), Thinking and Reasoning 2 (module 3), Self-Esteem (module 4), Thinking and Reasoning 3 (module 5), Behaviors and Strategies (module 6), Thinking and Reasoning 4 (module 7) and Perception of Feelings (module 8). Each session is planned to last 45-60 minutes. Materials will be used in the Metacognitive Training-Silver program are PPT (Power Point Presentations) slides, videos, homework exercises, and yellow-red cards. Metacognitive Training-Silver is planned to be applied face-to-face in 3 groups (12, 10, and 10 people) at scheduled times in a quiet room suitable for the group. In order to increase compliance with the Metacognitive Training-Silver program, the sessions will be applied during the routine treatment period.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Individuals aged 60 years and over,
- Diagnosis of depression by a psychiatrist according to DSM-V criteria,
- No change in psychopharmacological medications used within 3 months before the Metacognitive Training-Silver program,
- No psychiatric hospitalization in the last 3 months,
- No problems with vision, hearing, and understanding,
- Being literate,
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals under 60 years of age,
- Comorbid with a diagnosis of depression to the extent that it interferes with the understanding of the Metacognitive Training-Silver program;
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Istanbul University - Cerrahpaşa
Istanbul, Istanbul, 34381, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (30)
Batmaz S, Ozdel K. Psychometric Properties of the Revised and Abbreviated form of the Turkish Version of the Dysfunctional Attitude Scale. Psychol Rep. 2016 Feb;118(1):180-198. doi: 10.1177/0033294116628349.
PMID: 29693528BACKGROUNDCOVID-19 Mental Disorders Collaborators. Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet. 2021 Nov 6;398(10312):1700-1712. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02143-7. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
PMID: 34634250BACKGROUNDCuijpers P, Sijbrandij M, Koole SL, Andersson G, Beekman AT, Reynolds CF 3rd. Adding psychotherapy to antidepressant medication in depression and anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis. World Psychiatry. 2014 Feb;13(1):56-67. doi: 10.1002/wps.20089.
PMID: 24497254BACKGROUNDEvans-Lacko S, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Al-Hamzawi A, Alonso J, Benjet C, Bruffaerts R, Chiu WT, Florescu S, de Girolamo G, Gureje O, Haro JM, He Y, Hu C, Karam EG, Kawakami N, Lee S, Lund C, Kovess-Masfety V, Levinson D, Navarro-Mateu F, Pennell BE, Sampson NA, Scott KM, Tachimori H, Ten Have M, Viana MC, Williams DR, Wojtyniak BJ, Zarkov Z, Kessler RC, Chatterji S, Thornicroft G. Socio-economic variations in the mental health treatment gap for people with anxiety, mood, and substance use disorders: results from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) surveys. Psychol Med. 2018 Jul;48(9):1560-1571. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717003336. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
PMID: 29173244BACKGROUNDGBD 2019 Mental Disorders Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of 12 mental disorders in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;9(2):137-150. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00395-3. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
PMID: 35026139BACKGROUNDHu T, Zhao X, Wu M, Li Z, Luo L, Yang C, Yang F. Prevalence of depression in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Res. 2022 May;311:114511. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114511. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
PMID: 35316691BACKGROUNDIslam N, Sharp SJ, Chowell G, Shabnam S, Kawachi I, Lacey B, Massaro JM, D'Agostino RB Sr, White M. Physical distancing interventions and incidence of coronavirus disease 2019: natural experiment in 149 countries. BMJ. 2020 Jul 15;370:m2743. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2743.
PMID: 32669358BACKGROUNDJelinek L, Hauschildt M, Wittekind CE, Schneider BC, Kriston L, Moritz S. Efficacy of Metacognitive Training for Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Psychother Psychosom. 2016;85(4):231-4. doi: 10.1159/000443699. Epub 2016 May 27. No abstract available.
PMID: 27230865BACKGROUNDJelinek L, Van Quaquebeke N, Moritz S. Cognitive and Metacognitive Mechanisms of Change in Metacognitive Training for Depression. Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 14;7(1):3449. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03626-8.
PMID: 28615651BACKGROUNDJelinek L, Faissner M, Moritz S, Kriston L. Long-term efficacy of Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MCT): A randomized controlled trial. Br J Clin Psychol. 2019 Sep;58(3):245-259. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12213. Epub 2018 Dec 16.
PMID: 30556583BACKGROUNDLiu YC, Tang CC, Hung TT, Tsai PC, Lin MF. The Efficacy of Metacognitive Training for Delusions in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Informs Evidence-Based Practice. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2018 Apr;15(2):130-139. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12282. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
PMID: 29489070BACKGROUNDMoritz S, Woodward TS. Metacognitive training in schizophrenia: from basic research to knowledge translation and intervention. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2007 Nov;20(6):619-25. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e3282f0b8ed.
PMID: 17921766BACKGROUNDPerini G, Cotta Ramusino M, Sinforiani E, Bernini S, Petrachi R, Costa A. Cognitive impairment in depression: recent advances and novel treatments. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2019 May 10;15:1249-1258. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S199746. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31190831BACKGROUNDSkoog I. COVID-19 and mental health among older people in Sweden. Int Psychogeriatr. 2020 Oct;32(10):1173-1175. doi: 10.1017/S104161022000143X. Epub 2020 Jul 8. No abstract available.
PMID: 32635950BACKGROUNDvan Oosterhout B, Smit F, Krabbendam L, Castelein S, Staring AB, van der Gaag M. Metacognitive training for schizophrenia spectrum patients: a meta-analysis on outcome studies. Psychol Med. 2016 Jan;46(1):47-57. doi: 10.1017/S0033291715001105. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
PMID: 26190517BACKGROUNDYilmaz AE, Gencoz T, Wells A. Psychometric characteristics of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire and Metacognitions Questionnaire-30 and metacognitive predictors of worry and obsessive-compulsive symptoms in a Turkish sample. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2008 Nov-Dec;15(6):424-39. doi: 10.1002/cpp.589.
PMID: 19115461BACKGROUNDDietrichkeit M, Moritz S, Jelinek L. Die Behandlung psychischer Störungen mittels metakognitiver Interventionen am Beispiel des Metakognitiven Trainings für Depression (D-MKT). [The treatment of mental disorders using metacognitive interventions using the example of Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MKT)]. Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie, Psychologie und Psychotherapie. 2020; 68: 160-170.
BACKGROUNDErdfelder E, Faul F, Buchner A. GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers. 1996; 28(1): 1-11.
BACKGROUNDEser E, Gerçeklioğlu Saatli G, Eser S, Fidaner C, Baysan P, Pala T, Dündar P. Dünya sağlık örgütü - Avrupa "yaşlanma tutumu anketi (AAQ)" Türkçe sürümünün (AYTA-TR) psikometrik özellikleri. Türk Geriatri Dergisi. 2011; 14(2): 101 - 110.
BACKGROUNDFalci SG, Marques LS. CONSORT: when and how to use it. Dental Press J Orthod. 2015 May-Jun;20(3):13-5. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.20.3.013-015.ebo. No abstract available.
PMID: 26154451BACKGROUNDFansi A, Jehanno C, Lapalme M, Drapeau M, Bouchard S. [Effectiveness of psychotherapy compared to pharmacotherapy for the treatment of anxiety and depressive disorders in adults: A literature review]. Sante Ment Que. 2015 Winter;40(4):141-73. French.
PMID: 27203537BACKGROUNDHisli N. Beck Depresyon Envanterinin Üniversite Öğrencileri İçin Geçerliği Güvenirliği, Psikoloji Dergisi. 1989; 23: 3-13.
BACKGROUNDHisli N. Beck Depresyon Envanterinin Geçerliği Üzerine Bir Çalışma. Psikoloji Dergisi. 1989; 22: 118-126.
BACKGROUNDJelinek L, Otte C, Arlt S, Hauschildt M. Denkverzerrungen erkennen und korrigieren: Eine Machbarkeitsstudie zum Metakognitiven Training bei Depressionen (D-MKT). [Identifying and correcting cognitive biases: a pilot study on the Metacognitive Training for Depression (D-MCT)]. Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie, Psychologie und Psychotherapie. 2013; 61: 1-8.
BACKGROUNDKamber O. Depresyon tedavisinde metakognisyon eğitimi grup terapisinin (D-MKT) Türk Kültüründeki etkinliği [master's thesis]. [İstanbul (TR)]: Üsküdar Üniversitesi; 2017.
BACKGROUNDÖzgüç S, Tanriverdi D. Effects of Metacognitive Training (D-MCT) on Metacognition and Ruminative Thought Levels of Major Depression Patients. Int J Ment Health Addiction. 2023; 21, 2017-2028.
BACKGROUNDSchneider BC, Bücker L, Riker S, Jelinek L. A pilot study of Metacognitive Training for Depression in older adults. Zeitschrift für Neuropsychologie. 2018; 29: 7-19.
BACKGROUNDTosun A, Irak M. [Adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Metacognition Questionnaire-30 for the Turkish population, and its relationship to anxiety and obsessive-compulsive symptoms]. Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2008 Spring;19(1):67-80. Turkish.
PMID: 18330745BACKGROUNDJelinek L, Hauschildt M, Moritz S. Metakognitives Training bei Depression. Weinheim: Beltz; 2015.
BACKGROUNDAmerikan Psikiyatri Birliği, 2015. Ruhsal bozuklukların tanısal ve sayımsal el kitabı (E. Köroğlu.). Hekimler Yayın Birliği, 2013. ISBN-10: 9753001983, ISBN-13: 978-9753001984
BACKGROUND
Related Links
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Merve MURAT MEHMED ALİ, MSc, RN
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
- STUDY CHAIR
Sevim BUZLU, Prof, PhD, RN
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
- STUDY CHAIR
Lara Guedes de Pinho, Assoc Prof, PhD, RN
University of Évora
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer & Ph.D. Student at Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing Department
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 15, 2023
First Posted
September 18, 2023
Study Start
September 15, 2023
Primary Completion
October 30, 2024
Study Completion
October 30, 2024
Last Updated
August 26, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There is not a plan to make IPD (Individual Participant Data) available. After the study is completed, the publication which includes the data results will be available.