GENERAL vs. REGIONAL ANESTHESIA ON SLEEP QUALITY FOR HIP ARTROPLASTY PATIENTS
COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF GENERAL AND REGIONAL ANESTHESIA ON SLEEP QUALITY IN PATIENTS PLANNING TOTAL HIP ARTROPLASTY
1 other identifier
interventional
66
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Sleep disorders can impair cognitive function, decision-making ability, exercise capacity, and immune system.Sleep disorders, which may occur in the perioperative period as short-term or long-term, affect many patients. Patients have to face with perioperative sleep disorders, and this situation can continue for a long time after surgery. Anesthetic agents may cause sleep disturbances in the postoperative period. Anesthetics can disrupt the normal sleep-wake cycle and thus cause sleep insufficiency and poor sleep quality. The relationship between general anesthesia and postoperative sleep disorders is still unclear. It is advantageous to identify patients with pre-existing sleep disorders, since the risk of postoperative sleep disturbance is high. The investigators hypothesis that regional anesthesia does not disrupt the circadian rhythm compared to general anesthesia, is more successful in pain control, and thus provides a better sleep quality for patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 21, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 5, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 30, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 18, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 28, 2023
CompletedFebruary 14, 2024
September 1, 2023
1 year
August 30, 2023
February 13, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Subjective sleep quality (evaluated by PIRS-20 (Pitssburg Insomnia Rating Scale))
Sleep quality evaluated by PIRS-20 (Pitssburg Insomnia Rating Scale) , a scale provides ranging from 0 to 60 , with a high score indicating a poor quality of sleeping.
preoperative status a month before surgery and a day before surgery and one week postoperatively]
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Subjective anxiety level
Preoperative status a month before surgery and a day before surgery and one week postoperatively]
Subjective pain level
Preoperative status a month before surgery and a day before surgery and one week postoperatively]
Study Arms (2)
General anesthesia group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients allocated to the general anesthesia group will be subjected to general anesthesia with induction with propofol and will sevoflurane (inhalational agent) used for maintenance. End of the procedure all patients will be extubated and awakened in the operating room. İntravenous morphine patient-controlled analgesia will be used in the postoperative period.
Regional anesthesia group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients allocated to the regional anesthesia group will be subjected to combined spinal-epidural anesthesia with heavy bupivacaine or spinal anesthesia with PENG(pericapsular nerve group) block with bupivacaine. If lumbar combined spinal epidural anesthesia is applied epidural patient-controlled analgesia will be used in the postoperative period. If spinal anesthesia and PENG block is applied, intravenous morphine patient-controlled analgesia will be used in the postoperative period.
Interventions
Surgical procedure is performed under general anesthesia with propofol induction and mainteined with sevoflurane inhalation.
Surgical procedure is performed under regional anesthesia. Patients are sedated with 2 mg intravenous midazolam. Combined spinal epidural anesthesia or spinal anesthesia with PENG block is used for anesthesia and analgesia.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Planning of total hip arthroplasty (primary/redo)
- Elective procedure planning
- years and older patients
- ASA score between I-III
- Approved and signed the informed consent form
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who underwent THA with urgent indication
- Patients under 18 years of age
- Patients with ASA score 4 and above
- Patients who do not accept informed consent
- Those who refuse to participate in the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Bursa Uludağ University Faculty of Medicine
Bursa, Nilüfer, 16059, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The investigator completing the questionnaires will not be aware of patient group assignment
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research assistant
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 30, 2023
First Posted
September 18, 2023
Study Start
July 21, 2022
Primary Completion
August 5, 2023
Study Completion
October 28, 2023
Last Updated
February 14, 2024
Record last verified: 2023-09