Bioprothetic Valve Versus Mechanical Valve of Bioprothetic Valve Versus Mechanical Valve
Long-term Outcomes of Bioprothetic Valve Versus Mechanical Valve
1 other identifier
observational
30,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this study, the investigators aim to use data identified through the hospital's integrated medical database and National Health Insurance database to explore the long-term performance and benefits of biological and mechanical valves. This research aims to provide more recommendations and references for valve replacement in different patient populations.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Mar 2021
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 16, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 11, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 18, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2025
CompletedOctober 18, 2024
March 1, 2024
3.7 years
September 11, 2023
October 16, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
all-cause mortality
included estimated survival using a Cox regression model. Survival data were obtained for all NHIRD databases. Operative mortality was defined as death during the index hospitalization or within 30 days of the operation. Long-term survival data included death from all causes. survival outcome was measured months after the index operation.
1998-2019
Secondary Outcomes (1)
composite outcome and individual component of major adverse prosthesis-related events, including death, major bleeding, ischemic stroke, endocarditis, and aortic valve reoperation
1998-2019
Study Arms (2)
Bioprothetic valve
Groups undergoing cardiac valve surgery with bioprothetic valve.
Mechanical valve
Groups undergoing cardiac valve surgery with mechanical valves.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
A total of 30,000 individuals (including this institution and other domestic units).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, 100, Taiwan
Related Publications (1)
Takei Y, Chou NK, Wei LY, Fu HY, Yu HY, Chi NH. Robotic transmitral approach in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Int J Surg. 2024 Nov 1;110(11):7391-7394. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001934. No abstract available.
PMID: 38995189DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Nai-Hsin Chi
attending physician
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 11, 2023
First Posted
September 18, 2023
Study Start
March 16, 2021
Primary Completion
December 1, 2024
Study Completion
December 1, 2025
Last Updated
October 18, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-03