NCT06039345

Brief Summary

Through this prospective, single-arm cohort pilot study, we plan to explore the safety and effectiveness of Shoulder Radiofrequency Ablation (SRFA) in patients with non-operative chronic shoulder pain due to shoulder osteoarthritis with or without rotator cuff tears.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
10

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
7mo left

Started Feb 2024

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress78%
Feb 2024Dec 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 29, 2023

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 15, 2023

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 7, 2024

Completed
2.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2026

Last Updated

April 13, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2.8 years

First QC Date

August 29, 2023

Last Update Submit

April 6, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

shoulder radiofrequency ablation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the SRFA

    Pain reduction will be measured by calculating the proportion of participants who experienced ≥50% reduction of their shoulder pain on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the SRFA.

    1, 3, 6 and 12 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Myotomal strength at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after SRFA

    1, 3, 6 and 12 months after SRFA

  • American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES) at 1,3, 6 and 12 months after SRFA

    1, 3, 6 and 12 months after SRFA

  • Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 1,3, 6 and 12 months after SRFA

    1, 3, 6 and 12 months after SRFA

Eligibility Criteria

Age50 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

We will explore the effectiveness of SRFA to reduce chronic shoulder pain in 10 participants who were deemed non-surgical candidates by an orthopedic surgeon and who experienced ≥80% pain relief after a single shoulder joint anesthetic block.

You may qualify if:

  • ≥50 years old capable of understanding and providing consent in English, and capable of complying with the outcome instruments used
  • ≥3 months of shoulder pain refractory to conventional treatment (i.e., physiotherapy, medication, steroid injections)
  • Persistent shoulder pain ≥ 4/10 in intensity on a 7-day average
  • Shoulder pain refractory to conventional treatment (i.e., physical therapy, oral analgesics, steroid injection)
  • Prior consultation with a board-certified orthopedic shoulder surgeon, deemed a non-surgical candidate for the primary diagnosis of glenohumeral joint pain +/- rotator cuff pain
  • ≥80% pain relief for at least 30 minutes after a single fluoroscopically-guided block of the sensory branches of the SN, AN, and LPN with 0.5 mL of lidocaine at each nerve
  • Scheduled for procedure of interest

You may not qualify if:

  • Infection
  • Allergy to any medication needed to participate in this study
  • Previous partial/total/reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Participants with a history of RTC repair will not be excluded.
  • Neurologic disorders including radiculopathy, connective tissue/inflammatory joint disease/widespread soft tissue pain disorder
  • Severe, uncontrolled psychiatric disorder requiring hospitalization within 6 months
  • Intraarticular or subacromial injection to the study shoulder within 3 months before C-SRFA
  • Uncontrolled bleeding diathesis
  • Pregnancy
  • Pacemaker, neurostimulator, or other implanted device potentially sensitive to RF energy
  • Active Worker's compensation claim, litigation, or other possible reason for secondary gain.
  • Prior shoulder radiofrequency ablation
  • Daily opioid use

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

University of Utah Farmington Health Center

Farmington, Utah, 84025, United States

Location

University of Utah Orthopaedic Center

Salt Lake City, Utah, 84108, United States

Location

University of Utah South Jordan Health Center

South Jordan, Utah, 84009, United States

Location

Related Publications (26)

  • Andersson HI, Ejlertsson G, Leden I, Rosenberg C. Chronic pain in a geographically defined general population: studies of differences in age, gender, social class, and pain localization. Clin J Pain. 1993 Sep;9(3):174-82. doi: 10.1097/00002508-199309000-00004.

    PMID: 8219517BACKGROUND
  • Chard MD, Hazleman R, Hazleman BL, King RH, Reiss BB. Shoulder disorders in the elderly: a community survey. Arthritis Rheum. 1991 Jun;34(6):766-9. doi: 10.1002/art.1780340619.

    PMID: 2053923BACKGROUND
  • Allander E. Prevalence, incidence, and remission rates of some common rheumatic diseases or syndromes. Scand J Rheumatol. 1974;3(3):145-53. doi: 10.3109/03009747409097141. No abstract available.

    PMID: 4428194BACKGROUND
  • Luime JJ, Koes BW, Hendriksen IJ, Burdorf A, Verhagen AP, Miedema HS, Verhaar JA. Prevalence and incidence of shoulder pain in the general population; a systematic review. Scand J Rheumatol. 2004;33(2):73-81. doi: 10.1080/03009740310004667.

    PMID: 15163107BACKGROUND
  • Virta L, Joranger P, Brox JI, Eriksson R. Costs of shoulder pain and resource use in primary health care: a cost-of-illness study in Sweden. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Feb 10;13:17. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-17.

    PMID: 22325050BACKGROUND
  • Eckmann MS, Bickelhaupt B, Fehl J, Benfield JA, Curley J, Rahimi O, Nagpal AS. Cadaveric Study of the Articular Branches of the Shoulder Joint. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Sep/Oct;42(5):564-570. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000652.

    PMID: 28786899BACKGROUND
  • Eckmann MS, Johal J, Bickelhaupt B, McCormick Z, Abdallah RT, Menzies R, Soliman S, Nagpal AS. Terminal Sensory Articular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Chronic Intractable Shoulder Pain: A Novel Technique and Case Series. Pain Med. 2020 Apr 1;21(4):868-871. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz335. No abstract available.

    PMID: 31851366BACKGROUND
  • Bohannon RW. Reference values for extremity muscle strength obtained by hand-held dynamometry from adults aged 20 to 79 years. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Jan;78(1):26-32. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(97)90005-8.

    PMID: 9014953BACKGROUND
  • Bohannon RW. Grip strength impairments among older adults receiving physical therapy in a home-care setting. Percept Mot Skills. 2010 Dec;111(3):761-4. doi: 10.2466/03.10.15.PMS.111.6.761-764.

    PMID: 21319615BACKGROUND
  • Hayes K, Walton JR, Szomor ZL, Murrell GA. Reliability of 3 methods for assessing shoulder strength. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002 Jan-Feb;11(1):33-9. doi: 10.1067/mse.2002.119852.

    PMID: 11845146BACKGROUND
  • Kolber MJ, Beekhuizen K, Cheng MS, Fiebert IM. The reliability of hand-held dynamometry in measuring isometric strength of the shoulder internal and external rotator musculature using a stabilization device. Physiother Theory Pract. 2007 Mar-Apr;23(2):119-24. doi: 10.1080/09593980701213032.

    PMID: 17530541BACKGROUND
  • Awatani T, Mori S, Shinohara J, Koshiba H, Nariai M, Tatsumi Y, Nagata A, Morikita I. Same-session and between-day intra-rater reliability of hand-held dynamometer measurements of isometric shoulder extensor strength. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 Mar;28(3):936-9. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.936. Epub 2016 Mar 31.

    PMID: 27134388BACKGROUND
  • Michener LA, McClure PW, Sennett BJ. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, patient self-report section: reliability, validity, and responsiveness. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002 Nov-Dec;11(6):587-94. doi: 10.1067/mse.2002.127096.

    PMID: 12469084BACKGROUND
  • Jones IA, Togashi R, Heckmann N, Vangsness CT Jr. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for patient-reported shoulder outcomes. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Jul;29(7):1484-1492. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.12.033. Epub 2020 Apr 3.

    PMID: 32249146BACKGROUND
  • Conger A, Gililland J, Anderson L, Pelt CE, Peters C, McCormick ZL. Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Painful Knee Osteoarthritis: Current Evidence and Future Directions. Pain Med. 2021 Jul 25;22(Suppl 1):S20-S23. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab129.

    PMID: 34308957BACKGROUND
  • Conger A, Cushman DM, Walker K, Petersen R, Walega DR, Kendall R, McCormick ZL. A Novel Technical Protocol for Improved Capture of the Genicular Nerves by Radiofrequency Ablation. Pain Med. 2019 Nov 1;20(11):2208-2212. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz124.

    PMID: 31131850BACKGROUND
  • Koshi E, Cheney CW, Sperry BP, Conger A, McCormick ZL. Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for Chronic Knee Pain Using a Three-Tined Electrode: A Technical Description and Case Series. Pain Med. 2020 Dec 25;21(12):3344-3349. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa204.

    PMID: 32984887BACKGROUND
  • McCormick ZL, Cohen SP, Walega DR, Kohan L. Technical considerations for genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation: optimizing outcomes. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Jun;46(6):518-523. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-102117. Epub 2021 Jan 22.

    PMID: 33483425BACKGROUND
  • McCormick ZL, Reddy R, Korn M, Dayanim D, Syed RH, Bhave M, Zhukalin M, Choxi S, Ebrahimi A, Kendall MC, McCarthy RJ, Khan D, Nagpal G, Bouffard K, Walega DR. A Prospective Randomized Trial of Prognostic Genicular Nerve Blocks to Determine the Predictive Value for the Outcome of Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation for Chronic Knee Pain Due to Osteoarthritis. Pain Med. 2018 Aug 1;19(8):1628-1638. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx286.

    PMID: 29300971BACKGROUND
  • Roberts SL, Stout A, Dreyfuss P. Review of Knee Joint Innervation: Implications for Diagnostic Blocks and Radiofrequency Ablation. Pain Med. 2020 May 1;21(5):922-938. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz189.

    PMID: 31407791BACKGROUND
  • Tran A, Reiter DA, Fritz J, Cruz AR, Reimer NB, Lamplot JD, Gonzalez FM. Pilot study for treatment of symptomatic shoulder arthritis utilizing cooled radiofrequency ablation: a novel technique. Skeletal Radiol. 2022 Aug;51(8):1563-1570. doi: 10.1007/s00256-022-03993-y. Epub 2022 Jan 14.

    PMID: 35029737BACKGROUND
  • Eckmann MS, McCormick ZL, Beal C, Julia J, Cheney CW, Nagpal AS. Putting Our Shoulder to the Wheel: Current Understanding and Gaps in Nerve Ablation for Chronic Shoulder Pain. Pain Med. 2021 Jul 25;22(Suppl 1):S2-S8. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab152.

    PMID: 34308959BACKGROUND
  • Bogduk N. On diagnostic blocks for lumbar zygapophysial joint pain. F1000 Med Rep. 2010 Aug 9;2:57. doi: 10.3410/M2-57.

    PMID: 21173871BACKGROUND
  • Schneider BJ, Joshi M, Ehsanian R, McCormick ZL, Patel J, Zheng P, Nagpal AS. Patient-perceived duration of effect of lidocaine and bupivacaine following diagnostic medial branch blocks; a multicenter study. Interv Pain Med. 2022 Mar 18;1(2):100083. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2022.100083. eCollection 2022 Jun.

    PMID: 39239364BACKGROUND
  • Kohn MD, Sassoon AA, Fernando ND. Classifications in Brief: Kellgren-Lawrence Classification of Osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Aug;474(8):1886-93. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4732-4. Epub 2016 Feb 12. No abstract available.

    PMID: 26872913BACKGROUND
  • Diagnosis and treatment of incomplete rotator cuff tears - PubMed. Accessed June 22, 2022. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2182260/

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Shoulder PainRotator Cuff Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ArthralgiaJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsRuptureWounds and InjuriesShoulder InjuriesTendon Injuries

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 29, 2023

First Posted

September 15, 2023

Study Start

February 7, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Last Updated

April 13, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations