Shoulder RFA Pilot Study
The Effectiveness of Shoulder Terminal Sensory Articular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for Non-surgical Refractory Shoulder Pain Due to Rotator Cuff Pathology and Osteoarthritis; A Prospective Pilot Study
1 other identifier
observational
10
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Through this prospective, single-arm cohort pilot study, we plan to explore the safety and effectiveness of Shoulder Radiofrequency Ablation (SRFA) in patients with non-operative chronic shoulder pain due to shoulder osteoarthritis with or without rotator cuff tears.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Feb 2024
Typical duration for all trials
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 29, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 15, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 7, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2026
April 13, 2026
April 1, 2026
2.8 years
August 29, 2023
April 6, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the SRFA
Pain reduction will be measured by calculating the proportion of participants who experienced ≥50% reduction of their shoulder pain on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the SRFA.
1, 3, 6 and 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Myotomal strength at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after SRFA
1, 3, 6 and 12 months after SRFA
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES) at 1,3, 6 and 12 months after SRFA
1, 3, 6 and 12 months after SRFA
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at 1,3, 6 and 12 months after SRFA
1, 3, 6 and 12 months after SRFA
Eligibility Criteria
We will explore the effectiveness of SRFA to reduce chronic shoulder pain in 10 participants who were deemed non-surgical candidates by an orthopedic surgeon and who experienced ≥80% pain relief after a single shoulder joint anesthetic block.
You may qualify if:
- ≥50 years old capable of understanding and providing consent in English, and capable of complying with the outcome instruments used
- ≥3 months of shoulder pain refractory to conventional treatment (i.e., physiotherapy, medication, steroid injections)
- Persistent shoulder pain ≥ 4/10 in intensity on a 7-day average
- Shoulder pain refractory to conventional treatment (i.e., physical therapy, oral analgesics, steroid injection)
- Prior consultation with a board-certified orthopedic shoulder surgeon, deemed a non-surgical candidate for the primary diagnosis of glenohumeral joint pain +/- rotator cuff pain
- ≥80% pain relief for at least 30 minutes after a single fluoroscopically-guided block of the sensory branches of the SN, AN, and LPN with 0.5 mL of lidocaine at each nerve
- Scheduled for procedure of interest
You may not qualify if:
- Infection
- Allergy to any medication needed to participate in this study
- Previous partial/total/reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Participants with a history of RTC repair will not be excluded.
- Neurologic disorders including radiculopathy, connective tissue/inflammatory joint disease/widespread soft tissue pain disorder
- Severe, uncontrolled psychiatric disorder requiring hospitalization within 6 months
- Intraarticular or subacromial injection to the study shoulder within 3 months before C-SRFA
- Uncontrolled bleeding diathesis
- Pregnancy
- Pacemaker, neurostimulator, or other implanted device potentially sensitive to RF energy
- Active Worker's compensation claim, litigation, or other possible reason for secondary gain.
- Prior shoulder radiofrequency ablation
- Daily opioid use
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
University of Utah Farmington Health Center
Farmington, Utah, 84025, United States
University of Utah Orthopaedic Center
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84108, United States
University of Utah South Jordan Health Center
South Jordan, Utah, 84009, United States
Related Publications (26)
Andersson HI, Ejlertsson G, Leden I, Rosenberg C. Chronic pain in a geographically defined general population: studies of differences in age, gender, social class, and pain localization. Clin J Pain. 1993 Sep;9(3):174-82. doi: 10.1097/00002508-199309000-00004.
PMID: 8219517BACKGROUNDChard MD, Hazleman R, Hazleman BL, King RH, Reiss BB. Shoulder disorders in the elderly: a community survey. Arthritis Rheum. 1991 Jun;34(6):766-9. doi: 10.1002/art.1780340619.
PMID: 2053923BACKGROUNDAllander E. Prevalence, incidence, and remission rates of some common rheumatic diseases or syndromes. Scand J Rheumatol. 1974;3(3):145-53. doi: 10.3109/03009747409097141. No abstract available.
PMID: 4428194BACKGROUNDLuime JJ, Koes BW, Hendriksen IJ, Burdorf A, Verhagen AP, Miedema HS, Verhaar JA. Prevalence and incidence of shoulder pain in the general population; a systematic review. Scand J Rheumatol. 2004;33(2):73-81. doi: 10.1080/03009740310004667.
PMID: 15163107BACKGROUNDVirta L, Joranger P, Brox JI, Eriksson R. Costs of shoulder pain and resource use in primary health care: a cost-of-illness study in Sweden. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Feb 10;13:17. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-13-17.
PMID: 22325050BACKGROUNDEckmann MS, Bickelhaupt B, Fehl J, Benfield JA, Curley J, Rahimi O, Nagpal AS. Cadaveric Study of the Articular Branches of the Shoulder Joint. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Sep/Oct;42(5):564-570. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000652.
PMID: 28786899BACKGROUNDEckmann MS, Johal J, Bickelhaupt B, McCormick Z, Abdallah RT, Menzies R, Soliman S, Nagpal AS. Terminal Sensory Articular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Chronic Intractable Shoulder Pain: A Novel Technique and Case Series. Pain Med. 2020 Apr 1;21(4):868-871. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz335. No abstract available.
PMID: 31851366BACKGROUNDBohannon RW. Reference values for extremity muscle strength obtained by hand-held dynamometry from adults aged 20 to 79 years. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Jan;78(1):26-32. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(97)90005-8.
PMID: 9014953BACKGROUNDBohannon RW. Grip strength impairments among older adults receiving physical therapy in a home-care setting. Percept Mot Skills. 2010 Dec;111(3):761-4. doi: 10.2466/03.10.15.PMS.111.6.761-764.
PMID: 21319615BACKGROUNDHayes K, Walton JR, Szomor ZL, Murrell GA. Reliability of 3 methods for assessing shoulder strength. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002 Jan-Feb;11(1):33-9. doi: 10.1067/mse.2002.119852.
PMID: 11845146BACKGROUNDKolber MJ, Beekhuizen K, Cheng MS, Fiebert IM. The reliability of hand-held dynamometry in measuring isometric strength of the shoulder internal and external rotator musculature using a stabilization device. Physiother Theory Pract. 2007 Mar-Apr;23(2):119-24. doi: 10.1080/09593980701213032.
PMID: 17530541BACKGROUNDAwatani T, Mori S, Shinohara J, Koshiba H, Nariai M, Tatsumi Y, Nagata A, Morikita I. Same-session and between-day intra-rater reliability of hand-held dynamometer measurements of isometric shoulder extensor strength. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 Mar;28(3):936-9. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.936. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
PMID: 27134388BACKGROUNDMichener LA, McClure PW, Sennett BJ. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, patient self-report section: reliability, validity, and responsiveness. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002 Nov-Dec;11(6):587-94. doi: 10.1067/mse.2002.127096.
PMID: 12469084BACKGROUNDJones IA, Togashi R, Heckmann N, Vangsness CT Jr. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for patient-reported shoulder outcomes. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Jul;29(7):1484-1492. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.12.033. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
PMID: 32249146BACKGROUNDConger A, Gililland J, Anderson L, Pelt CE, Peters C, McCormick ZL. Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Painful Knee Osteoarthritis: Current Evidence and Future Directions. Pain Med. 2021 Jul 25;22(Suppl 1):S20-S23. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab129.
PMID: 34308957BACKGROUNDConger A, Cushman DM, Walker K, Petersen R, Walega DR, Kendall R, McCormick ZL. A Novel Technical Protocol for Improved Capture of the Genicular Nerves by Radiofrequency Ablation. Pain Med. 2019 Nov 1;20(11):2208-2212. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz124.
PMID: 31131850BACKGROUNDKoshi E, Cheney CW, Sperry BP, Conger A, McCormick ZL. Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for Chronic Knee Pain Using a Three-Tined Electrode: A Technical Description and Case Series. Pain Med. 2020 Dec 25;21(12):3344-3349. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa204.
PMID: 32984887BACKGROUNDMcCormick ZL, Cohen SP, Walega DR, Kohan L. Technical considerations for genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation: optimizing outcomes. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Jun;46(6):518-523. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-102117. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
PMID: 33483425BACKGROUNDMcCormick ZL, Reddy R, Korn M, Dayanim D, Syed RH, Bhave M, Zhukalin M, Choxi S, Ebrahimi A, Kendall MC, McCarthy RJ, Khan D, Nagpal G, Bouffard K, Walega DR. A Prospective Randomized Trial of Prognostic Genicular Nerve Blocks to Determine the Predictive Value for the Outcome of Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation for Chronic Knee Pain Due to Osteoarthritis. Pain Med. 2018 Aug 1;19(8):1628-1638. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx286.
PMID: 29300971BACKGROUNDRoberts SL, Stout A, Dreyfuss P. Review of Knee Joint Innervation: Implications for Diagnostic Blocks and Radiofrequency Ablation. Pain Med. 2020 May 1;21(5):922-938. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz189.
PMID: 31407791BACKGROUNDTran A, Reiter DA, Fritz J, Cruz AR, Reimer NB, Lamplot JD, Gonzalez FM. Pilot study for treatment of symptomatic shoulder arthritis utilizing cooled radiofrequency ablation: a novel technique. Skeletal Radiol. 2022 Aug;51(8):1563-1570. doi: 10.1007/s00256-022-03993-y. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
PMID: 35029737BACKGROUNDEckmann MS, McCormick ZL, Beal C, Julia J, Cheney CW, Nagpal AS. Putting Our Shoulder to the Wheel: Current Understanding and Gaps in Nerve Ablation for Chronic Shoulder Pain. Pain Med. 2021 Jul 25;22(Suppl 1):S2-S8. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnab152.
PMID: 34308959BACKGROUNDBogduk N. On diagnostic blocks for lumbar zygapophysial joint pain. F1000 Med Rep. 2010 Aug 9;2:57. doi: 10.3410/M2-57.
PMID: 21173871BACKGROUNDSchneider BJ, Joshi M, Ehsanian R, McCormick ZL, Patel J, Zheng P, Nagpal AS. Patient-perceived duration of effect of lidocaine and bupivacaine following diagnostic medial branch blocks; a multicenter study. Interv Pain Med. 2022 Mar 18;1(2):100083. doi: 10.1016/j.inpm.2022.100083. eCollection 2022 Jun.
PMID: 39239364BACKGROUNDKohn MD, Sassoon AA, Fernando ND. Classifications in Brief: Kellgren-Lawrence Classification of Osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Aug;474(8):1886-93. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4732-4. Epub 2016 Feb 12. No abstract available.
PMID: 26872913BACKGROUNDDiagnosis and treatment of incomplete rotator cuff tears - PubMed. Accessed June 22, 2022. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2182260/
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 29, 2023
First Posted
September 15, 2023
Study Start
February 7, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Last Updated
April 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share