A Randomized, Controlled Study of Two At-Home Self-Guided Virtual Reality Interventions for Adults With Social Anxiety Disorder.
BVR-100-102
BVR-100 and BES-100 Validation Trial: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Controlled Study of Two At-Home Self-Guided Virtual Reality Interventions for Adults With Social Anxiety Disorder.
1 other identifier
interventional
56
1 country
6
Brief Summary
This study is to compare two Virtual Reality (VR)-based interventions, BVR-100 and BES-100, for the treatment of Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
6 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 7, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 8, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 14, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 22, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 10, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 12, 2025
CompletedMarch 12, 2025
February 1, 2025
4 months
September 7, 2023
December 6, 2024
February 20, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Measurement of Intervention Credibility Assessed With the Credibility Score, at Baseline
The Credibility/Expectation Questionnaire (CEQ) asks about the improvements that subjects believe will be achieved as a result of treatment, and how believable, convincing,and logical the treatment seems.It contains six items rated on a 1-9 scale. The first three items load onto the credibility factor. Higher scores suggest better experience, lower scores suggest poor experience.Credibility score is calculated by taking the sum of score of the first 3 items of the CEQ scale ranging from 3 to 27.
Baseline
Measurement of Intervention Credibility Assessed With the Credibility Score, at Week 6
The Credibility/Expectation Questionnaire (CEQ) asks about the improvements that subjects believe will be achieved as a result of treatment, and how believable, convincing,and logical the treatment seems.It contains six items rated on a 1-9 scale. The first three items load onto the credibility factor. Higher scores suggest better experience, lower scores suggest poor experience.Credibility score is calculated by taking the sum of score of the first 3 items of the CEQ scale ranging from 3 to 27.
6 weeks
Measurement of Intervention Credibility Assessed With the Credibility Score, at Week 8
The Credibility/Expectation Questionnaire (CEQ) asks about the improvements that subjects believe will be achieved as a result of treatment, and how believable, convincing,and logical the treatment seems.It contains six items rated on a 1-9 scale. The first three items load onto the credibility factor. Higher scores suggest better experience, lower scores suggest poor experience.Credibility score is calculated by taking the sum of score of the first 3 items of the CEQ scale ranging from 3 to 27.
8 weeks
Measurement of Intervention Credibility Assessed With Expectancy Score, at Baseline
The Credibility/Expectation Questionnaire (CEQ) asks about the improvements that subjects believe will be achieved as a result of treatment, and how believable, convincing,and logical the treatment seems.It contains six items rated on a 1-9 scale. The final three items load onto the expectancy factor. Higher scores suggest better experience, lower scores suggest poor experience.Expectancy score is calculated by taking the sum of score of the last 3 items of the CEQ scale ranging from 3 to 27.
Baseline
Measurement of Intervention Credibility Assessed With the Expectancy Score, at Week 6
The Credibility/Expectation Questionnaire (CEQ) asks about the improvements that subjects believe will be achieved as a result of treatment, and how believable, convincing,and logical the treatment seems.It contains six items rated on a 1-9 scale. The final three items load onto the expectancy factor. Higher scores suggest better experience, lower scores suggest poor experience.Expectancy score is calculated by taking the sum of score of the last 3 items of the CEQ scale ranging from 3 to 27.
6 weeks
Measurement of Intervention Credibility Assessed With the ExpectancyScore, at Week 8
The Credibility/Expectation Questionnaire (CEQ) asks about the improvements that subjects believe will be achieved as a result of treatment, and how believable, convincing,and logical the treatment seems.It contains six items rated on a 1-9 scale. The final three items load onto the expectancy factor. Higher scores suggest better experience, lower scores suggest poor experience.Expectancy score is calculated by taking the sum of score of the last 3 items of the CEQ scale ranging from 3 to 27.
8 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Subject Retention Rate at Week 6
6 weeks
Subject Retention Rate at Week 8
8 weeks
Summary of Time-on-Task
8 weeks
Study Arms (2)
BVR-100
EXPERIMENTALExperimental at-home VR intervention for the treatment of SAD
BES-100
ACTIVE COMPARATORActive at-home VR intervention comparator
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject is male or female, aged 18 or above.
- Subject has English fluency and literacy.
- Subject meets the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, (DSM-5) criteria for Social Anxiety Disorder
- Subject has a total Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) score at Screening of ≥ 70.
You may not qualify if:
- Subject has significant visual, auditory or balance impairment
- Subject has history of photosensitive epilepsy or seizure disorder
- Subject has history of motion sickness or medical condition predisposing to nausea or dizziness.
- Subject has injuries, inflammation or infection affecting the eyes, ears or face that would make the use of the hardware uncomfortable.
- Subject has, current or lifetime history of meeting DSM-5 criteria for schizophrenia spectrum or other psychotic disorder, bipolar or related disorder, major neurocognitive disorder, neurodevelopmental disorder of greater than mild severity or of a severity that impacts the subject's ability to consent, follow study directions, or otherwise safely participate in the study; posttraumatic stress disorder, major depressive disorder (MDD) with psychotic features, borderline or antisocial personality disorder
- Subject has met DSM-5-based criteria for Alcohol or Substance Use Disorder (other than nicotine or caffeine) within one (1) year prior to Screening.
- Subject has received ketamine, esketamine, arketamine, or psychedelic therapies (eg, psilocybin, methylenedioxymethamphetamine \[MDMA\]) for MDD or any psychiatric condition within one (1) year prior to Screening.
- In the opinion of the Investigator: (a) study participation may pose a significant or undue risk to the subject; (b) the subject is unlikely to successfully complete all of the requirements of the study per protocol; or (c) study participation may adversely impact the integrity of the data or the validity of the study results.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc.lead
- BehaVR LLCcollaborator
Study Sites (6)
CNS Healthcare
Orlando, Florida, 32801, United States
Curavit Clinical Research
Boston, Massachusetts, 02116, United States
Boston Clinical Trials
Boston, Massachusetts, 02131, United States
Midwest Research Group
Saint Charles, Missouri, 63304, United States
Alivation Health, LLC
Lincoln, Nebraska, 68526, United States
Cedar Clinical Research
Draper, Utah, 84020, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Director, Frontier Business Office
- Organization
- Sumitomo Pharma America
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Robert Hayes, PhD
Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 7, 2023
First Posted
September 14, 2023
Study Start
September 8, 2023
Primary Completion
December 22, 2023
Study Completion
January 10, 2024
Last Updated
March 12, 2025
Results First Posted
March 12, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02