NCT06037668

Brief Summary

This study is to compare two Virtual Reality (VR)-based interventions, BVR-100 and BES-100, for the treatment of Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
56

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2023

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

6 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 7, 2023

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 8, 2023

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 14, 2023

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 22, 2023

Completed
19 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 10, 2024

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 12, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

March 12, 2025

Status Verified

February 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

September 7, 2023

Results QC Date

December 6, 2024

Last Update Submit

February 20, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Social Anxiety Disorder, Social Phobia

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Measurement of Intervention Credibility Assessed With the Credibility Score, at Baseline

    The Credibility/Expectation Questionnaire (CEQ) asks about the improvements that subjects believe will be achieved as a result of treatment, and how believable, convincing,and logical the treatment seems.It contains six items rated on a 1-9 scale. The first three items load onto the credibility factor. Higher scores suggest better experience, lower scores suggest poor experience.Credibility score is calculated by taking the sum of score of the first 3 items of the CEQ scale ranging from 3 to 27.

    Baseline

  • Measurement of Intervention Credibility Assessed With the Credibility Score, at Week 6

    The Credibility/Expectation Questionnaire (CEQ) asks about the improvements that subjects believe will be achieved as a result of treatment, and how believable, convincing,and logical the treatment seems.It contains six items rated on a 1-9 scale. The first three items load onto the credibility factor. Higher scores suggest better experience, lower scores suggest poor experience.Credibility score is calculated by taking the sum of score of the first 3 items of the CEQ scale ranging from 3 to 27.

    6 weeks

  • Measurement of Intervention Credibility Assessed With the Credibility Score, at Week 8

    The Credibility/Expectation Questionnaire (CEQ) asks about the improvements that subjects believe will be achieved as a result of treatment, and how believable, convincing,and logical the treatment seems.It contains six items rated on a 1-9 scale. The first three items load onto the credibility factor. Higher scores suggest better experience, lower scores suggest poor experience.Credibility score is calculated by taking the sum of score of the first 3 items of the CEQ scale ranging from 3 to 27.

    8 weeks

  • Measurement of Intervention Credibility Assessed With Expectancy Score, at Baseline

    The Credibility/Expectation Questionnaire (CEQ) asks about the improvements that subjects believe will be achieved as a result of treatment, and how believable, convincing,and logical the treatment seems.It contains six items rated on a 1-9 scale. The final three items load onto the expectancy factor. Higher scores suggest better experience, lower scores suggest poor experience.Expectancy score is calculated by taking the sum of score of the last 3 items of the CEQ scale ranging from 3 to 27.

    Baseline

  • Measurement of Intervention Credibility Assessed With the Expectancy Score, at Week 6

    The Credibility/Expectation Questionnaire (CEQ) asks about the improvements that subjects believe will be achieved as a result of treatment, and how believable, convincing,and logical the treatment seems.It contains six items rated on a 1-9 scale. The final three items load onto the expectancy factor. Higher scores suggest better experience, lower scores suggest poor experience.Expectancy score is calculated by taking the sum of score of the last 3 items of the CEQ scale ranging from 3 to 27.

    6 weeks

  • Measurement of Intervention Credibility Assessed With the ExpectancyScore, at Week 8

    The Credibility/Expectation Questionnaire (CEQ) asks about the improvements that subjects believe will be achieved as a result of treatment, and how believable, convincing,and logical the treatment seems.It contains six items rated on a 1-9 scale. The final three items load onto the expectancy factor. Higher scores suggest better experience, lower scores suggest poor experience.Expectancy score is calculated by taking the sum of score of the last 3 items of the CEQ scale ranging from 3 to 27.

    8 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Subject Retention Rate at Week 6

    6 weeks

  • Subject Retention Rate at Week 8

    8 weeks

  • Summary of Time-on-Task

    8 weeks

Study Arms (2)

BVR-100

EXPERIMENTAL

Experimental at-home VR intervention for the treatment of SAD

Device: BVR-100

BES-100

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Active at-home VR intervention comparator

Device: BES-100

Interventions

BVR-100DEVICE

Experimental self-guided VR intervention for the treatment of SAD

BVR-100
BES-100DEVICE

Active at-home VR intervention comparator

BES-100

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 99 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subject is male or female, aged 18 or above.
  • Subject has English fluency and literacy.
  • Subject meets the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, (DSM-5) criteria for Social Anxiety Disorder
  • Subject has a total Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) score at Screening of ≥ 70.

You may not qualify if:

  • Subject has significant visual, auditory or balance impairment
  • Subject has history of photosensitive epilepsy or seizure disorder
  • Subject has history of motion sickness or medical condition predisposing to nausea or dizziness.
  • Subject has injuries, inflammation or infection affecting the eyes, ears or face that would make the use of the hardware uncomfortable.
  • Subject has, current or lifetime history of meeting DSM-5 criteria for schizophrenia spectrum or other psychotic disorder, bipolar or related disorder, major neurocognitive disorder, neurodevelopmental disorder of greater than mild severity or of a severity that impacts the subject's ability to consent, follow study directions, or otherwise safely participate in the study; posttraumatic stress disorder, major depressive disorder (MDD) with psychotic features, borderline or antisocial personality disorder
  • Subject has met DSM-5-based criteria for Alcohol or Substance Use Disorder (other than nicotine or caffeine) within one (1) year prior to Screening.
  • Subject has received ketamine, esketamine, arketamine, or psychedelic therapies (eg, psilocybin, methylenedioxymethamphetamine \[MDMA\]) for MDD or any psychiatric condition within one (1) year prior to Screening.
  • In the opinion of the Investigator: (a) study participation may pose a significant or undue risk to the subject; (b) the subject is unlikely to successfully complete all of the requirements of the study per protocol; or (c) study participation may adversely impact the integrity of the data or the validity of the study results.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (6)

CNS Healthcare

Orlando, Florida, 32801, United States

Location

Curavit Clinical Research

Boston, Massachusetts, 02116, United States

Location

Boston Clinical Trials

Boston, Massachusetts, 02131, United States

Location

Midwest Research Group

Saint Charles, Missouri, 63304, United States

Location

Alivation Health, LLC

Lincoln, Nebraska, 68526, United States

Location

Cedar Clinical Research

Draper, Utah, 84020, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Phobia, Social

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Phobic DisordersAnxiety DisordersMental Disorders

Results Point of Contact

Title
Director, Frontier Business Office
Organization
Sumitomo Pharma America

Study Officials

  • Robert Hayes, PhD

    Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc.

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 7, 2023

First Posted

September 14, 2023

Study Start

September 8, 2023

Primary Completion

December 22, 2023

Study Completion

January 10, 2024

Last Updated

March 12, 2025

Results First Posted

March 12, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-02

Locations