Osseodensification Versus Conventional Drilling for Implant Site Preparation
1 other identifier
interventional
34
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A total of 34 participants, who require replacement of an anterior or posterior single tooth with dental implant, will be randomly allocated to two equal sized groups. In the control group, the osteotomy site preparation will be prepared by using conventional surgical drills, while the test group site preparation will involve the use of Densah™ Burs (Versah Co., LLC., USA) as per the osseodensification protocol. In addition to evaluating implant stability, the trial will also report on implant and patient outcomes at various time points.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 27, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 13, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 31, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2026
ExpectedApril 24, 2025
April 1, 2025
1.2 years
August 27, 2023
April 21, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Changes in Implant stability quotient (ISQ values) using resonance frequency analysis
Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) will be used to determine stability (the level of osseointegration) in dental implants. The stability will be presented as an implant stability quotient (ISQ) value. The measurements will be recorded at time of implant placement, delivery of implant restoration (baseline), one year of implant restoration and annually up to three years using resonance frequency analysis.
Upto 36 months
Implant failure rate
Implant failure rate will be assessed clinically after one year of implant restoration and annually up to three years.
Upto 36 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Changes in peri-implant marginal bone level (in mm)
Upto 36 months
Descriptive evaluation of biological and technical complications associated with dental implant restorations
Upto 36 months
Patient postoperative experience ( visual analogue scale )
Upto 10 days
Study Arms (2)
Osseodensification (test) group
EXPERIMENTALImplant site preparation will be completed using osseodensification technique where tapered multifluted burs (Densah Burs; Versah, MI, USA) will be used as per manufacturer's instructions.
Standard (control) group
ACTIVE COMPARATORImplant site preparation will be completed using conventional drilling protocol technique where standardized drills provided by Straumann (Straumann®, Institute Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland)) will be used as per manufacturer's instructions.
Interventions
The implant site will be prepared by raising a mucoperiosteal flap. Implant osteotomy will be prepared by using osseodensification technique using Versah burs and a dental implant will be placed. The flaps will then be replaced and sutured with 4/0 polyglycolic acid interrupted and mattress sutures.
The implant site will be prepared by raising a mucoperiosteal flap. Implant osteotomy will be prepared by using either conventional surgical drills provided by Straumann implant systems and a dental implant will be placed. The flaps will then be replaced and sutured with 4/0 polyglycolic acid interrupted and mattress sutures.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Aged 18 or over.
- Require replacement of an anterior or posterior single tooth with dental implant.
- Controlled oral hygiene (full-mouth plaque and bleeding scores ≤ 25% at baseline).
- Good compliance and commitment to attend follow-up review appointments.
- Willing to provide informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Localized / generalized periodontitis.
- Bone metabolic disease and/or taking medications that affect bone metabolism.
- Long term use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications.
- History of malignancy, radiotherapy or chemotherapy.
- Pregnant or lactating women.
- Severe bruxism or parafunctional habits.
- Participants, who have controlled medical condition or smokers, will not be excluded in this study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Dubai Dental Hospital
Dubai, 505055, United Arab Emirates
Related Publications (16)
Albrektsson T, Zarb GA. Current interpretations of the osseointegrated response: clinical significance. Int J Prosthodont. 1993 Mar-Apr;6(2):95-105.
PMID: 8329101BACKGROUNDAtieh MA, Alsabeeha NH, Faggion CM Jr, Duncan WJ. The frequency of peri-implant diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol. 2013 Nov;84(11):1586-98. doi: 10.1902/jop.2012.120592. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
PMID: 23237585BACKGROUNDAtsumi M, Park SH, Wang HL. Methods used to assess implant stability: current status. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Sep-Oct;22(5):743-54.
PMID: 17974108BACKGROUNDBuser D, Halbritter S, Hart C, Bornstein MM, Grutter L, Chappuis V, Belser UC. Early implant placement with simultaneous guided bone regeneration following single-tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: 12-month results of a prospective study with 20 consecutive patients. J Periodontol. 2009 Jan;80(1):152-62. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080360.
PMID: 19228101BACKGROUNDBuser D, von Arx T, ten Bruggenkate C, Weingart D. Basic surgical principles with ITI implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11 Suppl 1:59-68. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011s1059.x.
PMID: 11168257BACKGROUNDDi Stefano DA, Perrotti V, Greco GB, Cappucci C, Arosio P, Piattelli A, Iezzi G. The effect of undersizing and tapping on bone to implant contact and implant primary stability: A histomorphometric study on bovine ribs. J Adv Prosthodont. 2018 Jun;10(3):227-235. doi: 10.4047/jap.2018.10.3.227. Epub 2018 Jun 12.
PMID: 29930793BACKGROUNDFaul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
PMID: 19897823BACKGROUNDHuwais S, Meyer EG. A Novel Osseous Densification Approach in Implant Osteotomy Preparation to Increase Biomechanical Primary Stability, Bone Mineral Density, and Bone-to-Implant Contact. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Jan/Feb;32(1):27-36. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4817. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
PMID: 27741329BACKGROUNDInchingolo AD, Inchingolo AM, Bordea IR, Xhajanka E, Romeo DM, Romeo M, Zappone CMF, Malcangi G, Scarano A, Lorusso F, Isacco CG, Marinelli G, Contaldo M, Ballini A, Inchingolo F, Dipalma G. The Effectiveness of Osseodensification Drilling Protocol for Implant Site Osteotomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis. Materials (Basel). 2021 Feb 28;14(5):1147. doi: 10.3390/ma14051147.
PMID: 33671038BACKGROUNDJaved F, Ahmed HB, Crespi R, Romanos GE. Role of primary stability for successful osseointegration of dental implants: Factors of influence and evaluation. Interv Med Appl Sci. 2013 Dec;5(4):162-7. doi: 10.1556/IMAS.5.2013.4.3. Epub 2013 Dec 20.
PMID: 24381734BACKGROUNDLioubavina-Hack N, Lang NP, Karring T. Significance of primary stability for osseointegration of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Jun;17(3):244-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01201.x.
PMID: 16672018BACKGROUNDMeredith N. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant. Int J Prosthodont. 1998 Sep-Oct;11(5):491-501.
PMID: 9922740BACKGROUNDSennerby L, Meredith N. Resonance frequency analysis: measuring implant stability and osseointegration. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1998 May;19(5):493-8, 500, 502; quiz 504.
PMID: 9693511BACKGROUNDSennerby L, Meredith N. Implant stability measurements using resonance frequency analysis: biological and biomechanical aspects and clinical implications. Periodontol 2000. 2008;47:51-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2008.00267.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 18412573BACKGROUNDTrisi P, Berardini M, Falco A, Podaliri Vulpiani M. New Osseodensification Implant Site Preparation Method to Increase Bone Density in Low-Density Bone: In Vivo Evaluation in Sheep. Implant Dent. 2016 Feb;25(1):24-31. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000358.
PMID: 26584202BACKGROUNDTrisi P, Perfetti G, Baldoni E, Berardi D, Colagiovanni M, Scogna G. Implant micromotion is related to peak insertion torque and bone density. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 May;20(5):467-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01679.x.
PMID: 19522976BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Maanas S Shah, BDS MSD CAGS
Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- \- Double-blinded as both the participants and outcome accessors of radiographic outcomes will be blinded to the intervention.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 27, 2023
First Posted
September 13, 2023
Study Start
October 31, 2023
Primary Completion
December 31, 2024
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Last Updated
April 24, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share