NCT06034067

Brief Summary

A total of 34 participants, who require replacement of an anterior or posterior single tooth with dental implant, will be randomly allocated to two equal sized groups. In the control group, the osteotomy site preparation will be prepared by using conventional surgical drills, while the test group site preparation will involve the use of Densah™ Burs (Versah Co., LLC., USA) as per the osseodensification protocol. In addition to evaluating implant stability, the trial will also report on implant and patient outcomes at various time points.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
34

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
8mo left

Started Oct 2023

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress79%
Oct 2023Dec 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 27, 2023

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 13, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 31, 2023

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2024

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

April 24, 2025

Status Verified

April 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

August 27, 2023

Last Update Submit

April 21, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

osseointegrationbone densityosteotomyprimary stability

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Changes in Implant stability quotient (ISQ values) using resonance frequency analysis

    Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) will be used to determine stability (the level of osseointegration) in dental implants. The stability will be presented as an implant stability quotient (ISQ) value. The measurements will be recorded at time of implant placement, delivery of implant restoration (baseline), one year of implant restoration and annually up to three years using resonance frequency analysis.

    Upto 36 months

  • Implant failure rate

    Implant failure rate will be assessed clinically after one year of implant restoration and annually up to three years.

    Upto 36 months

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Changes in peri-implant marginal bone level (in mm)

    Upto 36 months

  • Descriptive evaluation of biological and technical complications associated with dental implant restorations

    Upto 36 months

  • Patient postoperative experience ( visual analogue scale )

    Upto 10 days

Study Arms (2)

Osseodensification (test) group

EXPERIMENTAL

Implant site preparation will be completed using osseodensification technique where tapered multifluted burs (Densah Burs; Versah, MI, USA) will be used as per manufacturer's instructions.

Procedure: Osseodensification osteotomy preparation

Standard (control) group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Implant site preparation will be completed using conventional drilling protocol technique where standardized drills provided by Straumann (Straumann®, Institute Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland)) will be used as per manufacturer's instructions.

Procedure: Standardized osteotomy preparation

Interventions

The implant site will be prepared by raising a mucoperiosteal flap. Implant osteotomy will be prepared by using osseodensification technique using Versah burs and a dental implant will be placed. The flaps will then be replaced and sutured with 4/0 polyglycolic acid interrupted and mattress sutures.

Also known as: Densah® burs, Versah co., USA
Osseodensification (test) group

The implant site will be prepared by raising a mucoperiosteal flap. Implant osteotomy will be prepared by using either conventional surgical drills provided by Straumann implant systems and a dental implant will be placed. The flaps will then be replaced and sutured with 4/0 polyglycolic acid interrupted and mattress sutures.

Also known as: Straumann® Twist Drills, Straumann, Switzerland
Standard (control) group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Aged 18 or over.
  • Require replacement of an anterior or posterior single tooth with dental implant.
  • Controlled oral hygiene (full-mouth plaque and bleeding scores ≤ 25% at baseline).
  • Good compliance and commitment to attend follow-up review appointments.
  • Willing to provide informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Localized / generalized periodontitis.
  • Bone metabolic disease and/or taking medications that affect bone metabolism.
  • Long term use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications.
  • History of malignancy, radiotherapy or chemotherapy.
  • Pregnant or lactating women.
  • Severe bruxism or parafunctional habits.
  • Participants, who have controlled medical condition or smokers, will not be excluded in this study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Dubai Dental Hospital

Dubai, 505055, United Arab Emirates

Location

Related Publications (16)

  • Albrektsson T, Zarb GA. Current interpretations of the osseointegrated response: clinical significance. Int J Prosthodont. 1993 Mar-Apr;6(2):95-105.

    PMID: 8329101BACKGROUND
  • Atieh MA, Alsabeeha NH, Faggion CM Jr, Duncan WJ. The frequency of peri-implant diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol. 2013 Nov;84(11):1586-98. doi: 10.1902/jop.2012.120592. Epub 2012 Dec 13.

    PMID: 23237585BACKGROUND
  • Atsumi M, Park SH, Wang HL. Methods used to assess implant stability: current status. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Sep-Oct;22(5):743-54.

    PMID: 17974108BACKGROUND
  • Buser D, Halbritter S, Hart C, Bornstein MM, Grutter L, Chappuis V, Belser UC. Early implant placement with simultaneous guided bone regeneration following single-tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: 12-month results of a prospective study with 20 consecutive patients. J Periodontol. 2009 Jan;80(1):152-62. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.080360.

    PMID: 19228101BACKGROUND
  • Buser D, von Arx T, ten Bruggenkate C, Weingart D. Basic surgical principles with ITI implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11 Suppl 1:59-68. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011s1059.x.

    PMID: 11168257BACKGROUND
  • Di Stefano DA, Perrotti V, Greco GB, Cappucci C, Arosio P, Piattelli A, Iezzi G. The effect of undersizing and tapping on bone to implant contact and implant primary stability: A histomorphometric study on bovine ribs. J Adv Prosthodont. 2018 Jun;10(3):227-235. doi: 10.4047/jap.2018.10.3.227. Epub 2018 Jun 12.

    PMID: 29930793BACKGROUND
  • Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):1149-60. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.

    PMID: 19897823BACKGROUND
  • Huwais S, Meyer EG. A Novel Osseous Densification Approach in Implant Osteotomy Preparation to Increase Biomechanical Primary Stability, Bone Mineral Density, and Bone-to-Implant Contact. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Jan/Feb;32(1):27-36. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4817. Epub 2016 Oct 14.

    PMID: 27741329BACKGROUND
  • Inchingolo AD, Inchingolo AM, Bordea IR, Xhajanka E, Romeo DM, Romeo M, Zappone CMF, Malcangi G, Scarano A, Lorusso F, Isacco CG, Marinelli G, Contaldo M, Ballini A, Inchingolo F, Dipalma G. The Effectiveness of Osseodensification Drilling Protocol for Implant Site Osteotomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis. Materials (Basel). 2021 Feb 28;14(5):1147. doi: 10.3390/ma14051147.

    PMID: 33671038BACKGROUND
  • Javed F, Ahmed HB, Crespi R, Romanos GE. Role of primary stability for successful osseointegration of dental implants: Factors of influence and evaluation. Interv Med Appl Sci. 2013 Dec;5(4):162-7. doi: 10.1556/IMAS.5.2013.4.3. Epub 2013 Dec 20.

    PMID: 24381734BACKGROUND
  • Lioubavina-Hack N, Lang NP, Karring T. Significance of primary stability for osseointegration of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006 Jun;17(3):244-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01201.x.

    PMID: 16672018BACKGROUND
  • Meredith N. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant. Int J Prosthodont. 1998 Sep-Oct;11(5):491-501.

    PMID: 9922740BACKGROUND
  • Sennerby L, Meredith N. Resonance frequency analysis: measuring implant stability and osseointegration. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1998 May;19(5):493-8, 500, 502; quiz 504.

    PMID: 9693511BACKGROUND
  • Sennerby L, Meredith N. Implant stability measurements using resonance frequency analysis: biological and biomechanical aspects and clinical implications. Periodontol 2000. 2008;47:51-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2008.00267.x. No abstract available.

    PMID: 18412573BACKGROUND
  • Trisi P, Berardini M, Falco A, Podaliri Vulpiani M. New Osseodensification Implant Site Preparation Method to Increase Bone Density in Low-Density Bone: In Vivo Evaluation in Sheep. Implant Dent. 2016 Feb;25(1):24-31. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000358.

    PMID: 26584202BACKGROUND
  • Trisi P, Perfetti G, Baldoni E, Berardi D, Colagiovanni M, Scogna G. Implant micromotion is related to peak insertion torque and bone density. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 May;20(5):467-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01679.x.

    PMID: 19522976BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Jaw, Edentulous, Partially

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Jaw, EdentulousJaw DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesStomatognathic DiseasesMouth, EdentulousMouth DiseasesTooth Diseases

Study Officials

  • Maanas S Shah, BDS MSD CAGS

    Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
\- Double-blinded as both the participants and outcome accessors of radiographic outcomes will be blinded to the intervention.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: * Prospective, in which participants will be recruited and then followed up throughout a specified period of time. * Randomized, parallel designed, concurrent controlled trial with participants randomly allocated to either control or test groups. * Double-blinded as both the participants and outcome accessors of radiographic outcomes will be blinded to the intervention.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Lecturer

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 27, 2023

First Posted

September 13, 2023

Study Start

October 31, 2023

Primary Completion

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Last Updated

April 24, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations