A 2-year Clinical Impact of Bulk-fill Low-viscosity Resin Composite Liners in Class II Restorations.
Two-Years Clinical Performance of Bulk-Fill High Viscosity Ormocer Versus Methacrylate-Based Resin Composite Restorative Systems: The Effect of Bulk-Fill Low-viscosity Resin Composite Liners in Class II Restorations.
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized clinical trial evaluated the clinical performance of class II resin composite restorations using bulk-fill high-viscosity ormocer versus methacrylate-based with or without a thin layer of bulk-fill low-viscosity (flowable) resin composite liners (BLRC) over 2 years. The null hypotheses in the study were as follows: (1) Different types of matrix structures (ormocer vs. methacrylate) have no effect on the marginal integrity of restorations; (2) A layer of bulk-fill resin compo-site liner of the same category would not affect the marginal or internal adaptation of restorations.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2020
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 15, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 27, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 17, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 2, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 13, 2023
CompletedSeptember 13, 2023
September 1, 2023
2.3 years
August 2, 2023
September 9, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
clinical performance
FDI criteria
two years
Study Arms (4)
Xtra-fill
ACTIVE COMPARATORBulk-fill high-viscosity methacrylate-based resin composites.
X-base
ACTIVE COMPARATORBulk-fill low-viscosity methacrylate-based resin composites.
Admira fusion x-tra
ACTIVE COMPARATORBulk-fill high-viscosity ormocer-based resin composites.
Admira fusion x-base
ACTIVE COMPARATORBulk-fill low-viscosity ormocer-based resin composites.
Interventions
bulk placement of the restoration Admira fusion -xtra.
Admira fusion x-base liner was used and then veneered by Admira fusion x-tra.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients having at least 4 posterior teeth with moderate occlusal-proximal carious lesions.
- Patients ranging in age from 18 to 30 years.
- patients with normal occlusion.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients having severe chronic periodontitis.
- Patients with orthodontic appliances.
- Abnormal occlusion, parafunctional habits.
- Teeth with irreversible pulpitis or non-vital.
- Fractured or cracked teeth.
- Previously restored teeth.
- Cavities with isthmus larger than intercuspal distance.
- Teeth with deep sub-gingival cavity margins.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Mansoura U
Al Mansurah, Mansoura, 35511, Egypt
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sa Mahmoud, professor
Operative Dentistry
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 2, 2023
First Posted
September 13, 2023
Study Start
January 15, 2020
Primary Completion
April 27, 2022
Study Completion
June 17, 2023
Last Updated
September 13, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-09