Best Incision in Cesarean Section of Obese Women
Difference Between Pfannenstiel Incision and Higher Transverse Supra Umbilical Incision, During Elective Cesarean Section in Morbidly Obese Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this comparative clinical trial is to compare Pfannenstiel incision and higher transverse supra umbilical incision techniques during elective cesarean section in morbidly obese patients. The main questions it aims to answer are: Is there a difference in operative time between the two incision techniques? Is there a difference in estimated blood loss between the two techniques? Is there a difference in post-operative pain scores between the two techniques? Is there a difference in wound complication rates between the two techniques? Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either a Pfannenstiel incision or a higher transverse supra umbilical incision during their scheduled cesarean delivery. Researchers will compare the Pfannenstiel incision group to the higher transverse supra umbilical incision group to see if there are differences in operative time, blood loss, post-operative pain, and wound complications.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 4, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 13, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 30, 2023
CompletedFebruary 20, 2024
February 1, 2024
1.2 years
September 4, 2023
February 18, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rate of surgical site wound infection
Surgical site infections will be assessed at the cesarean incision site and tracked for 4 weeks postoperatively. Wound infection will be defined as purulent drainage from the incision, positive culture, and/or at least two of the following signs or symptoms: pain or tenderness, localized swelling, redness, or heat. The 4-week timeframe starts on the day of surgery (day 0) and ends 28 days postoperatively. Wound infections occurring up to 4 weeks after surgery will be captured and recorded as the primary outcome measure. Wound assessments will be performed daily during the hospital stay, at the post-op visit around 2 weeks, and at the 4-week follow-up visit.
4 weeks after the surgery.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Operative time
during the surgery
Hospital length of stay
From day of surgery to discharge, up to 8 weeks.
Estimated blood loss
during the procedure
Postoperative pain
From end of surgery through 4 weeks postoperatively
Study Arms (2)
Pfannenstiel incision
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients randomized to the Pfannenstiel incision arm will undergo a transverse skin incision 2-3cm above the symphysis pubis. Subcutaneous tissue will be dissected until anterior rectus sheath is exposed. A transverse incision will be made through the rectus sheath in line with the skin incision, avoiding injury to the inferior epigastric arteries. Rectus muscles will be separated manually along midline using blunt dissection. The peritoneum will be incised transversely and the hysterotomy extended laterally with uterine traction to deliver fetus. The visceral peritoneum will not be closed. Rectus muscles will not be re-approximated. Subcutaneous tissue will not be irrigated. Subcutaneous tissue will be closed if over 2cm depth. Skin will be closed with non-absorbable suture subcuticularly.
Supra-Umbilical
EXPERIMENTALPatients randomized to the supra-umbilical transverse incision arm will undergo a transverse skin incision halfway between the umbilicus and xiphoid process, extending laterally to the semilunar lines. Subcutaneous tissue will be bluntly dissected until anterior rectus sheath is exposed. A transverse incision will be made through the rectus sheath in line with the skin incision, avoiding injury to the superior epigastric vessels. Rectus muscles will be split manually along midline using blunt dissection. The peritoneum will be incised transversely and the hysterotomy extended laterally with uterine traction to deliver fetus. The visceral peritoneum will not be closed. Rectus muscles will not be re-approximated. Subcutaneous tissue will not be irrigated. Subcutaneous tissue will be closed if over 2cm depth. Skin will be closed with non-absorbable suture subcuticularly.
Interventions
Patients randomized to the supra-umbilical transverse incision arm will receive a transverse skin incision halfway between the umbilicus and xiphoid process, extending laterally to the semilunar lines. The subcutaneous tissue will be bluntly dissected until the anterior rectus sheath is exposed. A transverse incision will be made through the rectus sheath in line with the skin incision, avoiding injury to the superior epigastric vessels. The rectus muscles will be split manually using blunt dissection. The peritoneum will be incised transversely and the hysterotomy extended laterally to deliver the fetus. The visceral peritoneum will not be closed. The rectus muscles will not be re-approximated. The subcutaneous tissue will not be irrigated but closed if over 2cm depth. The skin will be closed with non-absorbable suture subcuticularly.
Patients randomized to the supra-umbilical transverse incision arm will receive a transverse skin incision 3-4cm above the umbilicus, extending laterally to the semilunar lines, without panniculus retraction. The subcutaneous tissue will be bluntly dissected until the anterior rectus sheath is exposed. The rectus sheath will be incised transversely using electrocautery for hemostasis, avoiding injury to the superior epigastric vessels. The rectus muscles will be split manually along the midline using blunt dissection. The peritoneum will be transversely incised and the hysterotomy extended laterally to deliver the fetus. The visceral peritoneum will not be closed. The rectus muscles will not be re-approximated. The subcutaneous tissue will not be irrigated but closed if over 2cm depth. The skin will be closed with non-absorbable suture subcuticularly.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female patients aged between 20 and 40 years.
- Singleton pregnancy.
- Gestational age ≥ 37 weeks.
- Scheduled for elective cesarean delivery.
- Morbid obesity, defined as pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 kg/m2.
- Willing and able to provide informed consent.
- Able to adhere to study procedures and follow-up schedule.
You may not qualify if:
- Emergency cesarean delivery.
- Multiple gestation (twins, triplets, etc)
- Placenta previa or vasa previa.
- History of more than 1 previous cesarean delivery.
- HIV, hepatitis B/C infection.
- Current anticoagulation therapy.
- Immune-compromised conditions.
- Premature rupture of membranes.
- Pre-existing skin conditions affecting the abdomen.
- Inability to provide informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Al-Hussein University Hospital
Cairo, 11633, Egypt
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Muhamed A Alhagrasy, M.D.
Al-Azhar University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- lecturer and consultant at Obstetrics and Gynecology Department.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 4, 2023
First Posted
September 13, 2023
Study Start
August 1, 2022
Primary Completion
October 1, 2023
Study Completion
October 30, 2023
Last Updated
February 20, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The study involves a vulnerable population of pregnant women and collecting sensitive health information. Sharing individual participant data could risk participant privacy and confidentiality even if de-identified. The sample size is small at only 60 participants. individual participant data from such a small sample has a higher risk of re-identification. The research team intends to use the individual participant data for additional analyses and future studies. Sharing individual participant data may lead to misuse, misinterpretation, or compromised validity if not properly analyzed. Logistical barriers make preparing and curating a database for individual participant data sharing highly resource and time intensive for the research team.