Clinical Efficacy of Mini-PCNLversus RIRS for the Management of Upper Urinary Tract Calculus (1-2.5 cm)
Clinical Efficacy of Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery for the Management of Upper Urinary Tract Calculus (1-2.5 cm) in Children ≤10 Years of Age
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this \[ type of study:\]prospective randomized clinical trial. The main question is to compare the outcomes of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (m-PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in treating upper urinary tract calculus in children ≤ 10 years.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 19, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 11, 2023
CompletedSeptember 11, 2023
August 1, 2023
1.4 years
August 19, 2023
September 2, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
The fluoroscopy time of mini-PCNL and RIRS procedures in both groups
the duration of fluoroscopy time measured by seconds that the patient is exposed to during the procedure in both groups
for each case in both groups the investigator assess the duration of fluoroscopy that the patient is exposed during the time of operation which range from (2-4 hours) through study completion, an average of 1.5 year"
the stone free rate in both groups
Procedures will be accepted as stone free when there are no residual fragments or stone fragments \<3 mm at follow-up CTUT
after one month from intervention
The operation time of mini-PCNL and RIRS procedures in both groups
the time of procedure measured by minutes in both groups
for each case in both groups the investigator assess the time of operation from the induction of anesthesia till the end of operation "through study completion, an average of 1.5 year"
postoperative hospital stay time of mini-PCNL and RIRS procedures in both groups
the post operative hospital stay measured by hours
or each case in both groups the investigator assess the hospital time from the day of admission of patient in hospital to do intervention till patient discharge from hospital through study completion, an average of 1.5 year"
Study Arms (2)
childhood urolithiasis treated with mini PCNL Procedure
ACTIVE COMPARATORpediatric patients with upper urinary tract calculus treated with mini-PCNL procedure
childhood urolithiasis treated with RIRS Procedure
ACTIVE COMPARATORpediatric patients with upper urinary tract calculus treated with mini-PCNL procedure
Interventions
Mini-PCNL . A 12 Fr rigid nephroscope and a Holmium:YAG laser as energy source was used for surgery Percutaneous renal puncture was achieved with an 18 Ga needle after displaying renal collecting system with contrast material. and tract dilatation was achieved using Amplatz dilators up to 16-18 Fr according to patient age
RIRS Technique the 9.5 Fr ureteral access sheath (UAS). UAS was inserted over the guide wire under fluoroscopy control. A flexible ureteroscope was passed through the UAS. If the UAS did not pass over the guide wire, the investigator moved the flexible ureteroscopy over the guide wire without access sheat
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- This study will include all children (age \< 10 years) who undergo Mini-PCNL or RIRS with stone size (1\_2.5 cm) for upper urinary tract stones
You may not qualify if:
- Children with urinary tract infections until treated
- Children with ureteral stricture
- Congenital urological anomalies
- Previous urological surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Abdelrahman Nazmy Abbas Hatata
Cairo, 11511, Egypt
Related Publications (3)
Lu P, Song R, Yu Y, Yang J, Qi K, Tao R, Chen K, Zhang W, Gu M. Clinical efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for pediatric kidney urolithiasis: A PRISMA-compliant article. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Oct;96(43):e8346. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008346.
PMID: 29069011BACKGROUNDBastug F, Gunduz Z, Tulpar S, Poyrazoglu H, Dusunsel R. Urolithiasis in infants: evaluation of risk factors. World J Urol. 2013 Oct;31(5):1117-22. doi: 10.1007/s00345-012-0828-y. Epub 2012 Jan 19.
PMID: 22258667BACKGROUNDGao X, Fang Z, Lu C, Shen R, Dong H, Sun Y. Management of staghorn stones in special situations. Asian J Urol. 2020 Apr;7(2):130-138. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2019.12.014. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
PMID: 32257806BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
mohamed sa salem, MD
Ain Shams University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 19, 2023
First Posted
September 11, 2023
Study Start
February 1, 2022
Primary Completion
July 1, 2023
Study Completion
August 1, 2023
Last Updated
September 11, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share