Clostridioides Difficile Infection: Analyzing CLInic Evolution and Bacterial Clearance
DECLIC
1 other identifier
observational
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Clostridioides difficile (formerly Clostridium) is a bacterium found in the form of spores (resistance form) in the environment to which patients may be exposed. This bacterium used to belong to the Clostridium genus, but analysis of its 16S ribosomal RNA in 2016 led to its being distinguished from it. Once the spore has been ingested, it can germinate in vegetative form (the active form of the bacterium), taking on the appearance of a Gram-positive bacillus that will colonize the digestive microbiota. This preliminary stage of digestive colonization by the bacteria is facilitated by certain factors, notably nasogastric probing, antacids, etc. Antibiotics, for their part, disrupt the bacteria of the digestive microbiota (dysbiosis), thus facilitating the implantation of C. difficile. Certain strains (known as toxigenic) will produce the main virulence factors: toxins A (TcdA) and B (TcdB) ± a third toxin (binary toxin or CDT), and thus cause the main clinical signs of digestive infection, particularly in patients with risk factors for C. difficile infection (progressive cancer, immunodepression, etc.). Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is characterized by variable clinical presentations, ranging from simple watery diarrhea without colitis, which often resolves spontaneously, to severe forms with complications such as pseudomembranous colitis, intestinal perforation or septic shock, which have a very poor prognosis. Management of this type of CDI relies mainly on the oral administration of anti-clostridium difficile antibiotics such as fidaxomicin (FDX) or vancomycin (VAN) for 10 days, as recommended by the European ESCMID, British and American IDSA guidelines. Oral metronidazole is recommended only in the absence of availability of the first two molecules (community use). Despite this treatment, one of the main characteristics of CDI is a high recurrence rate, which can reach 25% of cases. With FDX, recurrence rates appear to be lower, especially as its administration regimen is optimized. Nevertheless, its high cost is a barrier to its wider use. In view of the high cost to the community of treating recurrences, and the reduced quality of life of patients suffering from these recurrences, which are sometimes multiple and highly incapacitating, reducing the occurrence of recurrences is a major challenge. A better understanding of the factors leading to recurrence is therefore a prerequisite for optimizing CDI prevention and treatment strategies. The study of colonic mucosal immunity (aimed at quantifying IgA in stools) could also contribute to a better understanding of patient progress. All these issues surrounding CDI and its management justify the setting up of a prospective cohort for the longitudinal follow-up of infected patients, enabling us to study the digestive clearance of the bacteria according to various factors, notably the digestive microbiota and the mucosal immune response.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Sep 2023
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 31, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 8, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 18, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 17, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 17, 2027
March 2, 2026
February 1, 2026
3.2 years
August 31, 2023
February 26, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Duration of delay between diagnosis of CDI and early or late elimination of C. difficile
This outcome corresponds to the kinetics of C. difficile elimination, and the time taken for the various microbiological tests (EIA, immunochromatography (ICT), culturomic and specific qPCR tests) detecting C. difficile in stools to become negative, from the day of diagnosis (i.e. before treatment was started), during the 10-day treatment period and after the end of treatment.
Month 2
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Confronting digestive microbiota dysbiosis with C. difficile elimination kinetics
Month 2
Impact of antibiotics prescribed for the treatment of CDI after 10 days of treatment
Day 10
Determination of the form in which C. difficile persists in the digestive microbiota during treatment and after the end of treatment until it is eliminated.
Month 2
Evaluation of the colonic and salivary mucosal immune response of included patients, in relation to patient progress and C. difficile elimination kinetics.
Month 2
Study Arms (1)
Patients with Clostridioides infection
The following procedures are specific to this test: 8 additional stool swabs (or Fecal Swab in the absence of stool output) to that of the initial diagnosis, plus four saliva swabs. Rectal swabs may cause anal irritation. The patient must also complete a stool collection form.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients hospitalized in a department of Hôpital Paris Saint-Joseph with microbiologically documented Clostridioides difficile infection or microbiologically documented recurrence of Clostridioides difficile infection, for whom treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection is to be initiated.
You may qualify if:
- Patients over 18 years of age
- Patients hospitalized in a department of GH Paris Saint-Joseph with a microbiologically documented Clostridioides difficile infection or a microbiologically documented Clostridioides difficile recurrence.
- Patient to be treated for Clostridioides difficile infection
- French-speaking patient
- Patients who do not object to their participation in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Patients under guardianship or curatorship
- Patient deprived of liberty
- Patient under court protection
- Pregnant or breast-feeding patient
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph
Paris, 75014, France
Related Publications (22)
Lawson PA, Citron DM, Tyrrell KL, Finegold SM. Reclassification of Clostridium difficile as Clostridioides difficile (Hall and O'Toole 1935) Prevot 1938. Anaerobe. 2016 Aug;40:95-9. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2016.06.008. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
PMID: 27370902BACKGROUNDJohnson S, Lavergne V, Skinner AM, Gonzales-Luna AJ, Garey KW, Kelly CP, Wilcox MH. Clinical Practice Guideline by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA): 2021 Focused Update Guidelines on Management of Clostridioides difficile Infection in Adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Sep 7;73(5):e1029-e1044. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab549.
PMID: 34164674BACKGROUNDvan Prehn J, Reigadas E, Vogelzang EH, Bouza E, Hristea A, Guery B, Krutova M, Noren T, Allerberger F, Coia JE, Goorhuis A, van Rossen TM, Ooijevaar RE, Burns K, Scharvik Olesen BR, Tschudin-Sutter S, Wilcox MH, Vehreschild MJGT, Fitzpatrick F, Kuijper EJ; Guideline Committee of the European Study Group on Clostridioides difficile. European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: 2021 update on the treatment guidance document for Clostridioides difficile infection in adults. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Dec;27 Suppl 2:S1-S21. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.09.038. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
PMID: 34678515BACKGROUNDCornely OA, Crook DW, Esposito R, Poirier A, Somero MS, Weiss K, Sears P, Gorbach S; OPT-80-004 Clinical Study Group. Fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for infection with Clostridium difficile in Europe, Canada, and the USA: a double-blind, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012 Apr;12(4):281-9. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70374-7. Epub 2012 Feb 8.
PMID: 22321770BACKGROUNDGuery B, Menichetti F, Anttila VJ, Adomakoh N, Aguado JM, Bisnauthsing K, Georgopali A, Goldenberg SD, Karas A, Kazeem G, Longshaw C, Palacios-Fabrega JA, Cornely OA, Vehreschild MJGT; EXTEND Clinical Study Group. Extended-pulsed fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection in patients 60 years and older (EXTEND): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3b/4 trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2018 Mar;18(3):296-307. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30751-X. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
PMID: 29273269BACKGROUNDGuery B, Berger P, Gauzit R, Gourdon M, Barbut F; DAFNE study group; Dafne Study Group, Bemer P, Bessede E, Camou F, Cattoir V, Couzigou C, Descamps D, Dinh A, Laurans C, Lavigne JP, Lechiche C, Leflon-Guibout V, Le Monnier A, Levast M, Mootien JY, N'Guyen Y, Piroth L, Prazuck T, Rogeaux O, Roux AL, Vachee A, Vernet Garnier V, Wallet F. A prospective, observational study of fidaxomicin use for Clostridioides difficile infection in France. J Int Med Res. 2021 Jun;49(6):3000605211021278. doi: 10.1177/03000605211021278.
PMID: 34162264BACKGROUNDWatt M, Dinh A, Le Monnier A, Tilleul P. Cost-effectiveness analysis on the use of fidaxomicin and vancomycin to treat Clostridium difficile infection in France. J Med Econ. 2017 Jul;20(7):678-686. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2017.1302946. Epub 2017 Mar 16.
PMID: 28299963BACKGROUNDKyne L, Warny M, Qamar A, Kelly CP. Association between antibody response to toxin A and protection against recurrent Clostridium difficile diarrhoea. Lancet. 2001 Jan 20;357(9251):189-93. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03592-3.
PMID: 11213096BACKGROUNDChilton CH, Crowther GS, Todhunter SL, Ashwin H, Longshaw CM, Karas A, Wilcox MH. Efficacy of alternative fidaxomicin dosing regimens for treatment of simulated Clostridium difficile infection in an in vitro human gut model. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015 Sep;70(9):2598-607. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv156. Epub 2015 Jun 14.
PMID: 26078392BACKGROUNDLe Monnier A, Candela T, Mizrahi A, Bille E, Bourgeois-Nicolaos N, Cattoir V, Farfour E, Grall I, Lecointe D, Limelette A, Marcade G, Poilane I, Poupy P, Kansau I, Zahar JR, Pilmis B; GMC Group. One-day prevalence of asymptomatic carriage of toxigenic and non-toxigenic Clostridioides difficile in 10 French hospitals. J Hosp Infect. 2022 Nov;129:65-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2022.05.011. Epub 2022 May 28.
PMID: 35640734BACKGROUNDLe Monnier A, Duburcq A, Zahar JR, Corvec S, Guillard T, Cattoir V, Woerther PL, Fihman V, Lalande V, Jacquier H, Mizrahi A, Farfour E, Morand P, Marcade G, Coulomb S, Torreton E, Fagnani F, Barbut F; GMC Study Group. Hospital cost of Clostridium difficile infection including the contribution of recurrences in French acute-care hospitals. J Hosp Infect. 2015 Oct;91(2):117-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2015.06.017. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
PMID: 26253518BACKGROUNDMeza-Torres J, Auria E, Dupuy B, Tremblay YDN. Wolf in Sheep's Clothing: Clostridioides difficile Biofilm as a Reservoir for Recurrent Infections. Microorganisms. 2021 Sep 10;9(9):1922. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9091922.
PMID: 34576818BACKGROUNDBarbut F, Galperine T, Vanhems P, Le Monnier A, Durand-Gasselin B, Canis F, Jeanbat V, Duburcq A, Alami S, Bensoussan C, Fagnani F. Quality of life and utility decrement associated with Clostridium difficile infection in a French hospital setting. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Jan 11;17(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1081-5.
PMID: 30634997BACKGROUNDDebast SB, Bauer MP, Kuijper EJ; European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: update of the treatment guidance document for Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014 Mar;20 Suppl 2:1-26. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12418.
PMID: 24118601BACKGROUNDSethi AK, Al-Nassir WN, Nerandzic MM, Bobulsky GS, Donskey CJ. Persistence of skin contamination and environmental shedding of Clostridium difficile during and after treatment of C. difficile infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Jan;31(1):21-7. doi: 10.1086/649016.
PMID: 19929371BACKGROUNDWenisch C, Parschalk B, Hasenhundl M, Hirschl AM, Graninger W. Comparison of vancomycin, teicoplanin, metronidazole, and fusidic acid for the treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. Clin Infect Dis. 1996 May;22(5):813-8. doi: 10.1093/clinids/22.5.813.
PMID: 8722937BACKGROUNDSaha S, Yadav D, Pardi R, Patel R, Khanna S, Pardi D. Kinetics of polymerase chain reaction positivity in patients with Clostridioides difficile infection. Ther Adv Gastroenterol. 2021 Oct 8;14:17562848211050443. doi: 10.1177/17562848211050443. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34646361BACKGROUNDKyne L, Warny M, Qamar A, Kelly CP. Asymptomatic carriage of Clostridium difficile and serum levels of IgG antibody against toxin A. N Engl J Med. 2000 Feb 10;342(6):390-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200002103420604.
PMID: 10666429BACKGROUNDWilcox MH, Gerding DN, Poxton IR, Kelly C, Nathan R, Birch T, Cornely OA, Rahav G, Bouza E, Lee C, Jenkin G, Jensen W, Kim YS, Yoshida J, Gabryelski L, Pedley A, Eves K, Tipping R, Guris D, Kartsonis N, Dorr MB; MODIFY I and MODIFY II Investigators. Bezlotoxumab for Prevention of Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jan 26;376(4):305-317. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602615.
PMID: 28121498BACKGROUNDAhluwalia B, Magnusson MK, Ohman L. Mucosal immune system of the gastrointestinal tract: maintaining balance between the good and the bad. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2017 Nov;52(11):1185-1193. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2017.1349173. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
PMID: 28697651BACKGROUNDNibbering B, Gerding DN, Kuijper EJ, Zwittink RD, Smits WK. Host Immune Responses to Clostridioides difficile: Toxins and Beyond. Front Microbiol. 2021 Dec 21;12:804949. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.804949. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34992590BACKGROUNDBridgman SL, Konya T, Azad MB, Guttman DS, Sears MR, Becker AB, Turvey SE, Mandhane PJ, Subbarao P; CHILD Study Investigators; Scott JA, Field CJ, Kozyrskyj AL. High fecal IgA is associated with reduced Clostridium difficile colonization in infants. Microbes Infect. 2016 Sep;18(9):543-9. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2016.05.001. Epub 2016 May 24.
PMID: 27235197BACKGROUND
Related Links
Biospecimen
additional stool samples (or Fecal Swab in the absence of stool output) to that of the initial diagnosis, as well as saliva samples
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Assaf MIZRAHI, MD
Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 31, 2023
First Posted
September 8, 2023
Study Start
September 18, 2023
Primary Completion (Estimated)
November 17, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
January 17, 2027
Last Updated
March 2, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02