A Comparative Clinical Study Between a Collagen Matrix and Collagen Membrane as Wound Protection During Ridge Preservation ARP
ARP
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Collagen Matrix to Collagen Membrane as Socket Seal in Alveolar Ridge Preservation
1 other identifier
interventional
18
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Patients in need of extraction of two teeth in combination with alveolar ridge preservation will be invited to participate in intra-subject RCT on ARP. Prior to surgery, a small-field low-dose CBCT is taken. 18 patients will be included, each contributing 1 surgical site to each treatment arm. Since this study is a intra-subject RCT randomization of the surgical site will be performed just after ARP by a coin flip. Randomization is concealed for the evaluating examiner and statistician. After ARP the collagen matrix or collagen membrane is used to seal the coronal aspect of the extraction socket. Soft tissue thickness in centre of the site will be determined using CBCT. Secondary outcomes include: Wound dimensions, socket wound healing score, changes in bone and soft tissue dimensions and changes in buccal soft tissue profile
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 31, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 8, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 2, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 2, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 2, 2025
CompletedSeptember 15, 2025
September 1, 2025
1.6 years
August 31, 2023
September 8, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Soft tissue thickness in the centre of the site
Changes in the soft tissue thickness at the centre of the site measured on CBCT
pre-op, 4 months
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Socket Wound Healing Score (SWHS)
1 week, 3 weeks, 4 months
Changes in bone and soft tissue dimensions
4 months
Changes in buccal soft tissue profile
pre-op, 4 months
Study Arms (2)
Collagen membrane
ACTIVE COMPARATORBioGide Compressed® 13x25 mm, Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland
collagen matrix
EXPERIMENTALMucograft Seal®, Geistlich Pharma AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland
Interventions
Socket seal is performed after ARP. Using a collagen matrix or membrane the socket is sealed, at the control (membrane) site a small pouch is made at the buccal and lingual aspect. Monofilament sutures are used to secure the respective material in place.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- At least 21 years old
- Good oral hygiene defined as a full-mouth plaque score ≤ 25% (O'Leary, Drake, \& Naylor, 1972)
- Need for ARP after tooth extraction at two sites in the maxilla or mandible with \> 50% buccal bone present following tooth extraction
- Signed informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Any systemic disease
- Pregnancy
- Smoking (will be specifically asked)
- Untreated periodontitis
- Untreated caries lesions
- Suppuration and/or active infection around the failing tooth
- Midfacial recession at the failing tooth
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ghent University Hospital
Ghent, East Flanders, 9000, Belgium
Related Publications (7)
Afat IM, Akdogan ET, Gonul O. Effects of leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin alone and combined with hyaluronic acid on early soft tissue healing after surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: A prospective clinical study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019 Feb;47(2):280-286. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.11.023. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
PMID: 30579747BACKGROUNDAvila-Ortiz G, Chambrone L, Vignoletti F. Effect of alveolar ridge preservation interventions following tooth extraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Jun;46 Suppl 21:195-223. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13057. Erratum In: J Clin Periodontol. 2020 Jan;47(1):129. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13212.
PMID: 30623987BACKGROUNDEeckhout C, Bouckaert E, Verleyen D, De Bruyckere T, Cosyn J. A 3-Year Prospective Study on a Porcine-Derived Acellular Collagen Matrix to Re-Establish Convexity at the Buccal Aspect of Single Implants in the Molar Area: A Volumetric Analysis. J Clin Med. 2020 May 22;9(5):1568. doi: 10.3390/jcm9051568.
PMID: 32455863BACKGROUNDMartins JR, Wagner TP, Vallim AC, Konflanz W, Schwendicke F, Celeste RK, Haas AN. Comparison of the efficacy of different techniques to seal the alveolus during alveolar ridge preservation: Meta-regression and network meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2022 Jul;49(7):694-705. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13628. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
PMID: 35451071BACKGROUNDO'Leary TJ, Drake RB, Naylor JE. The plaque control record. J Periodontol. 1972 Jan;43(1):38. doi: 10.1902/jop.1972.43.1.38. No abstract available.
PMID: 4500182BACKGROUNDSeyssens L, Eghbali A, Christiaens V, De Bruyckere T, Doornewaard R, Cosyn J. A one-year prospective study on alveolar ridge preservation using collagen-enriched deproteinized bovine bone mineral and saddle connective tissue graft: A cone beam computed tomography analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Oct;21(5):853-861. doi: 10.1111/cid.12843. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
PMID: 31456345BACKGROUNDTonetti MS, Cortellini P, Graziani F, Cairo F, Lang NP, Abundo R, Conforti GP, Marquardt S, Rasperini G, Silvestri M, Wallkamm B, Wetzel A. Immediate versus delayed implant placement after anterior single tooth extraction: the timing randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2017 Feb;44(2):215-224. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12666. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
PMID: 27978602BACKGROUND
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- It concerns a surgical intervention. Hence, the treating surgeon and patient cannot be masked. The investigators and outcome assessors are masked.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 31, 2023
First Posted
September 8, 2023
Study Start
January 2, 2024
Primary Completion
August 2, 2025
Study Completion
December 2, 2025
Last Updated
September 15, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09