Evaluation of Impact of AI Assistance on Workload Associated w Preparation of Rare Tumor Case Repts
A Prospective Evaluation of Impact of AI Assistance on Workload Associated With Preparation of Rare Tumor Case Reports
1 other identifier
interventional
10
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to explore cognitive burden perceptions among physicians in relation to case report writing. Furthermore, this study evaluates the use of artificial intelligence (AI) assistance as a tool to reduce cognitive burden among providers preparing and submitting case reports. If an AI-tool is helpful in this setting, it may potentially help increase reporting of rare medical events and thereby improve the evidence base for care of these patient populations. This study will occur at a single time point which is expected to last approximately 2 hours. This session will include reviewing two rare tumor cases and then writing a clinical vignette with and without AI assistance.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 29, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 6, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2026
April 14, 2026
April 1, 2026
7 months
August 29, 2023
April 13, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Subjective Cognitive workload (CWL)
Subjective Cognitive workload (CWL) will be measured while interviews using The National Aeronautics and Space Administration task load (NASA TLX) index is a tool for measuring and conducting a subjective mental workload (MWL) assessment. The NASA-TLX is a subjective measure of CWL and is used across many disciplines. The NASA-TLX considers six dimensions-Mental, Physical, and Temporal Demands, Frustration, Effort, and Performance. NASA-TLX scores ≥55 have been associated with reduced performance in numerous settings. NASA-TLX is considered to be the most used subjective measure of CWL. The validated two-stage process with participants performing 15 separate pair-wise comparisons between 6 dimensions of NASA-TLX will be used. A workload score will be marked from low and high for each dimension. Score values from 0 -100. The Interpretation Score of NASA TLX for Low 0-9, Medium 10-29, Somewhat high 30-49, High 50-79, and Very high 80-100
Baseline to 2 hours
Perceived cognitive load
The perceived cognitive load will be measured using System Usability Scale (SUS). SUS is a validated post-test questionnaire that measures user satisfaction. Further, studies confirm that SUS is predictive of the impacts of changes to the user interface on usability when multiple changes to a single product were made over a large number of iterations. SUS is composed of 10 questions- five positive and five negative statements, each having a five-point scale that ranges from strongly disagree to strongly agree. SUS provides a score (range, 0-100) based on the participant's rating of 10 statements regarding usability with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction with usability.
Baseline to 2 hours
Study Arms (2)
Case Report with Artificial Intelligence
EXPERIMENTALMedical students, resident physicians, or attending physicians report rare cases with using Artificial Intelligence.
Case Report without Artificial Intelligence
NO INTERVENTIONMedical students, resident physicians, or attending physicians report rare cases without using Artificial Intelligence.
Interventions
Participants will use the Artificial Intelligence assistance tool for case reports.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \. The subject is a physician, medical student, or postdoctoral student.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27514, United States
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shivani Sud
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 29, 2023
First Posted
September 6, 2023
Study Start
May 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Last Updated
April 14, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share