Comparative Effect of Palatal Injection in Pediatric Patient
1 other identifier
observational
96
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to compare the pain perception of pediatric patients during extraction with and without palatal injection and to show whether articaine HCl and lidocaine HCl can provide palatal anesthesia in maxillary tooth extraction without the need for a second palatal injection. In addition, to evaluate the superiority of articaine HCl and lidocaine HCl to each other in providing local anesthesia and to compare pain control between each other. An observational prospective clinical study is planned to be performed in children aged 8-12 years with maxillary tooth extraction indication. It is planned to include 96 children in the study. Patients will be divided into 6 groups. After the application of anesthesia and after tooth extraction, the pain they feel with visual analogue scale and the level of pain observed with the Wong-Baker faces pain rating scale will be marked.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started May 2023
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 2, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 28, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 30, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 5, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 6, 2023
CompletedSeptember 6, 2023
August 1, 2023
4 months
August 30, 2023
August 30, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Evaluation of pain during tooth extraction after anesthesia with VAS
The VAS is one of the most commonly used self-reported measures of pain; It measures a property that is believed to change over a continuum of values that are not easy to measure directly. However, it is a one-dimensional scale that measures only the sensory component or intensity of the pain experience. The millimeter scale is the most commonly used measuring range and produces a possible score range of 0 to 100 with a 10 cm line
baseline and maximum 8 minutes
Evaluation of pain during tooth extraction after anesthesia with Wong-Baker
The Wong-Baker faces pain rating scale (WBFPS) presents 6 faces with increasing pain rating from left to right. Each face was assigned a score from 0 to 10, indicated on the scale. it means that Face 0 doesn't hurt at all, Face 2 hurts a little, Face 4 hurts a little more, Face 6 hurts more, Face 8 hurts a lot, and Face 10 hurts as much as you can imagine
baseline and maximum 8 minutes
Study Arms (6)
Buccal infiltration anesthesia + palatal infiltration anesthesia (with articaine HCl)
Before extraction, buccal and palatal infiltration anesthesia with articaine will perform. Following anesthesia, extraction will carry out.
Buccal infiltration anesthesia + palatal infiltration anesthesia (with lidocaine HCl)
Before extraction, buccal and palatal infiltration anesthesia with lidocaine will perform. Following anesthesia, extraction will carry out.
Buccal infiltration anesthesia (5 minutes waiting time with articaine HCl)
Before extraction, buccal infiltration anesthesia with articaine will perform. After 5 minutes, extraction will carry out.
Buccal infiltration anesthesia (5 minutes waiting time with lidocaine HCl)
Before extraction, buccal infiltration anesthesia with lidocaine will perform. After 5 minutes, extraction will carry out.
Buccal infiltration anesthesia (8 minutes waiting time with articaine HCl)
Before extraction, buccal infiltration anesthesia with articaine will perform. After 8 minutes, extraction will carry out.
Buccal infiltration anesthesia (8 minutes waiting time with lidocaine HCl)
Before extraction, buccal infiltration anesthesia with lidocaine will perform. After 8 minutes, extraction will carry out.
Interventions
Buccal infiltration anesthesia + palatal infiltration anesthesia (with articaine HCl) was applied for first group Buccal infiltration anesthesia was applied and 5 minutes was waited before extraction. Buccal infiltration anesthesia was applied and 8 minutes was waited before extraction.
Buccal infiltration anesthesia + palatal infiltration anesthesia (with lidocaine HCl) was applied for second group Buccal infiltration anesthesia was applied and 5 minutes was waited before extraction for fourth group Buccal infiltration anesthesia was applied and 8 minutes was waited before extraction for sixth group
Eligibility Criteria
The study is planned to be carried out in children aged 8-12 years with maxillary tooth extraction indication.
You may qualify if:
- The child has no systemic disease
- Absence of acute toothache
- Child's first tooth extraction treatment
- No suspected allergy to benzocaine, lidocaine or articaine
- Comply with Frankl's 3 or Frankl's 4 behavioral assessments
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who do not want to participate in the study
- Any systemic condition
- Patients with any drug or local anesthetic allergy
- Patient has acute toothache or abscess
- Patients with previous tooth extraction experience
- Frankl 1 and Frankl 2 patients
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ankara Yıldırım beyazıt University, Faculty of Dentistry
Ankara, 06790, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (3)
Bataineh AB, Nusair YM, Al-Rahahleh RQ. Comparative study of articaine and lidocaine without palatal injection for maxillary teeth extraction. Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Aug;23(8):3239-3248. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2738-x. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
PMID: 30417227BACKGROUNDRaslan N, Masri R. A randomized clinical trial to compare pain levels during three types of oral anesthetic injections and the effect of Dentalvibe(R) on injection pain in children. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2018 Jan;28(1):102-110. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12313. Epub 2017 Jun 24.
PMID: 28646527BACKGROUNDUckan S, Dayangac E, Araz K. Is permanent maxillary tooth removal without palatal injection possible? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Dec;102(6):733-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.12.005. Epub 2006 Mar 20.
PMID: 17138173RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
ceren tatlı, assist.Prof
Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University
Central Study Contacts
Ceren Tatlı
CONTACT
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 1 Day
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- asistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 30, 2023
First Posted
September 6, 2023
Study Start
May 2, 2023
Primary Completion
August 28, 2023
Study Completion
September 5, 2023
Last Updated
September 6, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-08