Comparison of Vortioxetine Versus Other Antidepressants With Pregabalin Augmentation in Burning Mouth Syndrome
Comparative Evaluation of Vortioxetine Versus Other Antidepressants With Pregabalin Augmentation in Treatment-resistant Burning Mouth Syndrome: a Prospective Longitudinal Clinical Trial With Treatment Response Prediction
1 other identifier
interventional
203
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Background: The treatment of Burning Mouth Syndrome (BMS) presents a challenge in tailoring appropriate medication for individual patients. Antidepressants have demonstrated efficacy in alleviating symptoms in most cases; however, a subset of patients exhibit limited or no response to these treatments. The augmentation with pregabalin to conventional treatment has shown promising outcomes in relieving pain and improving quality of life in chronic pain conditions. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of vortioxetine with other antidepressants (SSRIs/SNRIs) in combination with pregabalin in a cohort of unresponsive BMS patients and to predict treatment response using clinical data. Methods: A 52-week randomized, open-label, active-controlled study was conducted, enrolling 203 BMS patients previously treated with one antidepressant for 12 weeks and non-responder to the treatment. The study sample have included two groups: Group A (136) received vortioxetine, while Group B (67) received SSRIs/SNRIs. Pregabalin (75mg/day) was added to both groups, with a potential dosage increase to 150mg/day for inadequate responders after 12 weeks. Treatment response was assessed by measuring reduction in VAS and SF-MPQ scores (\>50 or 1-2) and HAM-A and HAM-D scores (\>50% or ≤7) at 12, 24, 36 and 52 weeks. Classical logistic regression with a stepwise algorithm and Random Forest machine learning models were used to predict treatment response.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3
Started Jan 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 29, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 6, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 30, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 24, 2024
CompletedSeptember 6, 2023
August 1, 2023
10 months
August 29, 2023
August 29, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (Hayes and Patterson, 1921) is a well-validated unidimensional instrument for the measure of pain intensity (Hawker et al., 2011). The score is determined by measuring the distance on the line between the "no pain" and the mark of a patient mark, providing a range of scores from 0 to 10 (0 = no oral symptoms and 10 = the worst imaginable discomfort).
4 times evaluation: time 0: 0 week; time 1: 12 weeks; time 2: 24 weeks; time 3: 36 weeks; time 4: 52 weeks
Short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ)
the short form of the McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) is a measure of the quality of pain and is a multidimensional pain questionnaire, which measures the sensory, affective, and evaluative aspects of the perceived pain (Hawker et al., 2011). It comprises 15 items from the original MPQ, each scored from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). The SF-MPQ score is obtained by summing the item scores (range 0-45). There are no established critical cutoff points for the interpretation of the scores and, as for the MPQ, a higher score indicates the worse pain.
4 times evaluation: time 0: 0 week; time 1: 12 weeks; time 2: 24 weeks; time 3: 36 weeks; time 4: 52 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Hamilton rating scale for Depression (HAM-D)
4 times evaluation: time 0: 0 week; time 1: 12 weeks; time 2: 24 weeks; time 3: 36 weeks; time 4: 52 weeks
Hamilton rating scale for Anxiety (HAM-A)
4 times evaluation: time 0: 0 week; time 1: 12 weeks; time 2: 24 weeks; time 3: 36 weeks; time 4: 52 weeks
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
4 times evaluation: time 0: 0 week; time 1: 12 weeks; time 2: 24 weeks; time 3: 36 weeks; time 4: 52 weeks
Other Outcomes (1)
Clinical Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) and Severity (CGI-S)
3 times evaluation: time 1: 12 weeks; time 2: 24 weeks; time 3: 36 weeks; time 4: 52 weeks
Study Arms (6)
Vortioxetine+Pregabalin
EXPERIMENTALVO group(20mg)+ PGB (75mg) N= 136 Vortioxetine 20 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily, then pregabalin 75 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily. Pregabalin (75mg/day) was added, with a potential dosage increase to 150mg/day for inadequate responders after 12 weeks
Paroxetine+Pregabalin
ACTIVE COMPARATORP group (20mg) + PGB (75mg); N= 10 Paroxetine 20 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily, then pregabalin 75 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily. Pregabalin (75mg/day) was added, with a potential dosage increase to 150mg/day for inadequate responders after 12 weeks
Sertraline+Pregabalin
ACTIVE COMPARATORS group (50mg) + PGB (75mg); N= 8 Sertraline 50 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily, then pregabalin 75 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily. Pregabalin (75mg/day) was added, with a potential dosage increase to 150mg/day for inadequate responders after 12 weeks
Citalopram+Pregabalin
ACTIVE COMPARATORC group (20mg)+ PGB (75mg) N= 8 Citalopram 20 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily, then pregabalin 75 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily. Pregabalin (75mg/day) was added, with a potential dosage increase to 150mg/day for inadequate responders after 12 weeks
Escitalopram+Pregabalin
ACTIVE COMPARATORE group (10mg) + PGB (75mg); N= 8 Escitalopram 10 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily, then pregabalin 75 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily. Pregabalin (75mg/day) was added, with a potential dosage increase to 150mg/day for inadequate responders after 12 weeks
Duloxetine+Pregabalin
ACTIVE COMPARATORD group (60mg)+ PGB (75mg) N= 33 Duloxetine 60 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily, then pregabalin 75 mg, encapsulated tablets, orally, once daily. Pregabalin (75mg/day) was added, with a potential dosage increase to 150mg/day for inadequate responders after 12 weeks
Interventions
Encapsulated vortioxetine immediate release tablets, once daily
Encapsulated pregabalin tablets, once daily
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients with a confirmed diagnosis of BMS based on the International Classification of Orofacial Pain, 1st edition \[International Classification of Orofacial Pain, 1st edition (ICOP) Cephalalgia, 2020\]
- patients of any race or gender; complaining of oral burning recurring daily for \>2 h per day for \>3 months;
- normal blood test findings (including blood count, blood glucose levels, glycated hemoglobin, serum iron, ferritin and transferrin).
- BMS patients previously treated with one antidepressant for 12 weeks and non-responder to the treatment
You may not qualify if:
- the presence of any disease that could be recognized as a causative factor of BMS,
- a history of a psychiatric disorder or a neurological or organic brain disorder,
- a history of alcohol or substance abuse,
- the presence of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS)
- uncontrolled hypertension, diabetes, HIV, narrow-angle glaucoma, or participants enrolled in other investigational studies.
- participants requiring continued treatment with medications that adversely interact with the study medications (eg, quinolone antibiotics, warfarin, agents inhibiting serotonin reuptake) or with hereditary problems of fructose intolerance, glucose galactose malabsorption, or sucrose isomaltase insufficiency
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Naples Federico II
Napoli, Italia, 80131, Italy
Related Publications (3)
Adamo D, Calabria E, Coppola N, Pecoraro G, Mignogna MD. Vortioxetine as a new frontier in the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain: a review and update. Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2021 Sep 3;11:20451253211034320. doi: 10.1177/20451253211034320. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34497709BACKGROUNDAdamo D, Pecoraro G, Coppola N, Calabria E, Aria M, Mignogna M. Vortioxetine versus other antidepressants in the treatment of burning mouth syndrome: An open-label randomized trial. Oral Dis. 2021 May;27(4):1022-1041. doi: 10.1111/odi.13602. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
PMID: 32790904BACKGROUNDAdamo D, Canfora F, Pecoraro G, Leuci S, Coppola N, Marenzi G, Ottaviani G, Rupel K, Pellegrini L, Aria M, D'Aniello L, Mignogna MD, Albert U. Vortioxetine versus SSRI/SNRI with Pregabalin Augmentation in Treatment-Resistant Burning Mouth Syndrome: A Prospective Clinical Trial. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2025;23(7):800-819. doi: 10.2174/1570159X22999240729103717.
PMID: 40016875DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Assistant
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 29, 2023
First Posted
September 6, 2023
Study Start
January 1, 2023
Primary Completion
October 30, 2023
Study Completion
July 24, 2024
Last Updated
September 6, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-08