NCT06022965

Brief Summary

This clinical trial evaluates whether geriatric assessment-driven interventions with supportive care (GAIN-S) using telemedicine can be used to identify areas of vulnerability (weakness) in older adults with cancer and guide interventions to assist the patient and the healthcare team in the underserved community. The majority of patients diagnosed with cancer are over age 65 years, yet most cancer treatments are developed and tested in a younger population. Therefore, older patients with cancer are less likely to be offered standard treatments because of the concern regarding side effects. Geriatric assessment (GA) is a multi-dimensional health assessment tool combining patient reported and objective (unbiased) results. There is no standard tool that can identify which older adults will be more likely to have side effects from cancer treatment. Telemedicine is a way to provide healthcare services (including consultations, education, care management and treatment) in which the health care provider is at a distant site. The goal of this project is to use telemedicine to identify areas of vulnerability/weakness in older adults with cancer using a patient assessment, and to identify the potential referrals to a multi-specialty team based on patient assessment results. Information gathered from this study may help researchers learn whether GAIN-S can be performed using telemedicine and lead to improvement in care for older adults compared to standard of care (SOC) in the underserved community.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
216

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
9mo left

Started Jul 2023

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress80%
Jul 2023Jan 2027

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 24, 2023

Completed
28 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 21, 2023

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 5, 2023

Completed
3.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 24, 2027

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 24, 2027

Last Updated

October 6, 2025

Status Verified

October 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3.5 years

First QC Date

August 21, 2023

Last Update Submit

October 2, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Rate of advance directive (AD) completion

    Will be assessed using medical chart review. Chi-square test will be used to compare the proportions of AD completion between the two arms.

    At start of treatment and 3 months after treatment initiation

  • Number of documented conversations.

    Will be assessed using medical chart review. T-test will be used to compare the mean number of documented conversations between the two arms.

    At start of treatment and 3 months after treatment initiation

  • Direct inpatient cost

    Will log transformed and Z-score test will be used to compare the mean costs of the two arms. Chi-square test will be used to compare number of patients with short verse (vs.) long stay and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission between the two arms.

    At 3 and 6-months after treatment initiation

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Decrease in treatment toxicity

    At 3 months after randomization

  • Proportion of patients with dose modifications

    Up to 6 months

  • Patient satisfaction using the "Was It Worth It" (WIWI)

    At 3 and/or 6-months after treatment initiation

  • Patient preferences and goals

    At baseline, 3 and/or 6 months after treatment initiation

  • Association of Community Cancer Centers (ACCC) Geriatric Oncology Gap Assessment Tool

    Baseline and at the end of study (36 months)

Study Arms (2)

ARM I (GAIN-S)

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients complete the CARG-GA at baseline and 3 months and receive GA-based interventions using telemedicine over 6 months.

Other: Best PracticeOther: Comprehensive Geriatric AssessmentOther: Electronic Health Record ReviewOther: Questionnaire AdministrationOther: Supportive CareOther: Telemedicine

ARM II (SOC)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Receive SOC over the first 3 months, then switch to receive GA-based interventions using telemedicine for the following 3 months. Patients complete the CARG-GA at baseline and 3 months and receive SOC over 6 months.

Other: Best PracticeOther: Comprehensive Geriatric AssessmentOther: Electronic Health Record ReviewOther: Questionnaire Administration

Interventions

Receive SOC

Also known as: standard of care, standard therapy
ARM I (GAIN-S)ARM II (SOC)

Complete CARG-GA

ARM I (GAIN-S)ARM II (SOC)

Ancillary studies

ARM I (GAIN-S)ARM II (SOC)

Ancillary studies

ARM I (GAIN-S)ARM II (SOC)

Receive GA-based interventions

Also known as: Supportive Therapy, Symptom Management, Therapy, Supportive
ARM I (GAIN-S)

Receive GA-based interventions via telemedicine

Also known as: Telehealth
ARM I (GAIN-S)

Eligibility Criteria

Age65 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsOlder Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Documented informed consent of the participant.
  • Patient's physician must agree for patient participation.
  • Ability to read English, Spanish, or Chinese. Other languages will be acceptable with site principal investigator (PI) agreement if surveys are available, and language does not preclude completing study procedures.
  • Age: \>=65 years at the time of enrollment.
  • Diagnosis of stage I-IV cancer.
  • Scheduled to start a new therapy (chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or targeted therapy).

You may not qualify if:

  • Prospective participants who, in the opinion of the investigator, may not be able to comply with all study procedures (including compliance issues related to feasibility/logistics).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

City of Hope Medical Center

Duarte, California, 91010, United States

RECRUITING

City of Hope Antelope Valley

Lancaster, California, 93534, United States

RECRUITING

City of Hope Upland

Upland, California, 91786, United States

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Practice Guidelines as TopicStandard of CareGeriatric AssessmentPalliative CareTelemedicine

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Guidelines as TopicQuality Assurance, Health CareQuality of Health CareHealth Services AdministrationHealth Care Quality, Access, and EvaluationQuality Indicators, Health CareData CollectionEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesHealth StatusDemographyPopulation CharacteristicsHealth Care Evaluation MechanismsEpidemiologic MeasurementsPublic HealthEnvironment and Public HealthPatient CareTherapeuticsHealth ServicesHealth Care Facilities Workforce and ServicesDelivery of Health CarePatient Care Management

Study Officials

  • William Dale

    City of Hope Medical Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 21, 2023

First Posted

September 5, 2023

Study Start

July 24, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 24, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 24, 2027

Last Updated

October 6, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-10

Locations