Impact of After Visit Instructions on Patient Comprehension
Utilization and Utility of Patient After-Visit Instructions at a University Rheumatology Outpatient Clinic: Status and Randomized Prospective Pilot Intervention Study
1 other identifier
interventional
75
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This prospective study aims to analyze the influence of standardized after visit instructions (AVI) and teach back (TB) method on patients' understanding of health information. The study divided routine clinic patients into three groups: standard care, standardized AVI, and standardized AVI with TB. Patient health literacy, satisfaction, and AVI comprehension were gauged through surveys and post-visit follow-up calls. The investigators hypothesized that there would be an improvement in patient comprehension with the standardized AVI or TB when compared to controls.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2022
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 28, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 12, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 21, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 1, 2023
CompletedSeptember 11, 2023
September 1, 2023
5 months
August 21, 2023
September 6, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Patient Comprehension Survey
This is a telephone survey that will assess patients comprehension of disease over three main categories: disease state, medication changes, and referral/imaging/lab requests. Each category will be measure concordance of the patients understanding with what was written in the note in the form of a percentage from 0% to 100%. A higher percentage means a better understanding of ones disease.
1-2 weeks after initial visit
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Patient Satisfaction Survey
Will receive in email or in person immediately after initial visit
Study Arms (3)
Control
NO INTERVENTIONPatients received standard after visit procedure based on the provider
Standardized After Visit Instructions Only
EXPERIMENTALThe standardized after visit instructions (AVI) only group included patients receiving typed standardized AVI which included a text template that providers used to write customized AVI for the patient.
Standardized After Visit Instructions & Teach Back
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe standardized AVI \& teach back (TB) group included standardized written AVI with the patient repeating to the provider which changes and future management had been agreed upon during the visit.
Interventions
The intervention took a standardized approach to after visit instructions which included a customizable template that would review patients conditions, changes in any medications, and any future labs, imaging, or referrals.
This intervention included the Standardized After Visit Instructions and included teach back, a process by which patients restate in their own words their understanding of their condition, what was discussed in the visit, and what potential changes were made
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \- Patients seen in the Rush University Medical Center Rheumatology Clinic
You may not qualify if:
- Tele-medicine visits
- English is not the primary language. This is due to inability of all providers to provide custom AVI due to language limitations
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Rush University Medical Center Division of Rheumatology
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sobia Hassan, MD
Rush University Medical Center Associate Professor Rheumatology Department
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 21, 2023
First Posted
September 1, 2023
Study Start
December 1, 2022
Primary Completion
April 28, 2023
Study Completion
May 12, 2023
Last Updated
September 11, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share