NCT06020287

Brief Summary

The goal of this observational study was to compare the perioperative outcomes, postoperative urinary control rates and positive surgical margin (PSM) rates of the robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy combined anterior and posterior approach (AP-RARP) with the Retzius-sparing approach (RS-RARP) and anterior approach (anterior-RARP) in the treatment of prostate cancer. The main question it aims to answer was:

  • The early therapeutic efficacy of the robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy combined anterior and posterior approach Participants has been underwent:
  • AP-RARP
  • RS-RARP
  • anterior-RARP Researchers compared the three groups to see if AP-RARP combines the advantages of anterior and posterior RARP and is a feasible surgical option for the treatment of prostate cancer.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
233

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2020

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2020

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 31, 2022

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 27, 2022

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 8, 2023

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 31, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

August 31, 2023

Status Verified

August 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

August 8, 2023

Last Update Submit

August 27, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • urinary continence

    was defined as using 0-1 pad a day

    0-6 month after surgery

  • positive surgical margin

    observed whether the tissue cutting in surgery has tumor cell in surgical margin by pathologist

    2 weeks after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • operating time

    the day of the surgery

  • intraoperative blood loss

    the day of the surgery

Study Arms (3)

AP-RARP

the robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy combined anterior and posterior approach

Procedure: the robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

RS-RARP

the robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Retzius-sparing approach

Procedure: the robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

anterior-RARP

he robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with anterior approach

Procedure: the robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy

Interventions

We collect medical data of 233 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer who underwent AP-RARP, RS-RARP or anterior-RARP. Perioperative outcomes, including operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative and postoperative transfusion, postoperative infection, and anastomotic leakage, were compared among the three groups. The postoperative continence rates and PSM rates were also compared.

AP-RARPRS-RARPanterior-RARP

Eligibility Criteria

Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

The clinical data of 233 patients treated between September 2020 and May 2022 at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital were retrospectively analyzed.

You may qualify if:

  • pathologically diagnosed with prostate cancer by prostate biopsy
  • underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery
  • the surgery performed by Weidong Gan
  • the extended pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLA) is performed on patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PSA≥20 ng/ml or Grade Group 4-5 or clinical stage ≥T2c) and those considered to have a possibility of lymph node metastasis based on imaging evaluation.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with a clinical and pathological TNM stage ≥T3b and N1
  • patients with distant metastasis
  • urinary incontinence before surgery
  • received neoadjuvant therapy before surgery

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Urology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School

Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210008, China

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Prostatic Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Genital Neoplasms, MaleUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsGenital Diseases, MaleGenital DiseasesUrogenital DiseasesProstatic DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Attending Doctor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 8, 2023

First Posted

August 31, 2023

Study Start

September 1, 2020

Primary Completion

May 31, 2022

Study Completion

December 27, 2022

Last Updated

August 31, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-08

Locations