Assessment of Visual Performance With Virtual Reality After Cataract Surgery
Applying Virtual Reality to Compare Visual Performance Following Bilateral Implantation of TECNIS Synergy vs TECNIS Monofocal Intraocular Lens With Monovision in Patients With Cataract: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
1 other identifier
interventional
114
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The proposed randomized clinical trial aims to compare visual performance, measured using VR simulations, in cataract patients implanted either with bilateral trifocal IOL or bilateral monofocal IOL with monovision. The hypothesis is that patients implanted with trifocal IOL would exhibit superior visual performance, in both daytime and nighttime conditions, compared to those with a monofocal IOL with monovision.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2023
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 23, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 29, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2024
CompletedAugust 29, 2023
August 1, 2023
1 year
August 23, 2023
August 23, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Overall Virtual reality (VR) performance score
VR performance score measured from all VR simulations
Pre-operation, Month3
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Task-specific VR performance score
Pre-operation, Month3
Binocular reading speed assessment
Pre-operation, Month3
Binocular contrast sensitivity
Pre-operation, Month3
Distance visual acuity
Pre-operation, Day1, Week1, Month1, Month3
Intermediate (66 cm) visual acuity
Month3
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Bilateral implantation of trifocal intraocular lens
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will receive bilateral implantation of TECNIS Synergy intraocular lens
Bilateral monofocal intraocular lens implantation with monovision
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will receive bilateral implantation of TECNIS monofocal intraocular lens
Interventions
Cataract surgery with implantation of bilateral trifocal IOL (TECNIS Synergy) implantation or bilateral monofocal IOL (Tecnis monofocal) with monovision.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Bilateral cataract
- Regular corneal astigmatism
- Corneal endothelium cell count \>2000 cells/mm2
- Clear intraocular media other than cataract
You may not qualify if:
- Concomitant ocular diseases
- Irregular corneal aberration
- Capsular instability
- Systemic disease that may affect vision
- History of other intraocular surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- The University of Hong Konglead
- Janssen, LPcollaborator
Related Publications (12)
Zhang F, Sugar A, Jacobsen G, Collins M. Visual function and spectacle independence after cataract surgery: bilateral diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses versus monovision pseudophakia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 May;37(5):853-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.12.041.
PMID: 21511153BACKGROUNDMahrous A, Ciralsky JB, Lai EC. Revisiting monovision for presbyopia. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2018 Jul;29(4):313-317. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000487.
PMID: 29708928BACKGROUNDChen M, Atebara NH, Chen TT. A comparison of a monofocal Acrysoft IOL using the "blended monovision" formula with the multifocal array IOL for glasses independence after cataract surgery. Ann Ophthalmol (Skokie). 2007 Fall;39(3):237-40. doi: 10.1007/s12009-007-0035-4.
PMID: 18025632BACKGROUNDGoldberg DG, Goldberg MH, Shah R, Meagher JN, Ailani H. Pseudophakic mini-monovision: high patient satisfaction, reduced spectacle dependence, and low cost. BMC Ophthalmol. 2018 Nov 9;18(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12886-018-0963-3.
PMID: 30413145BACKGROUNDSmith CE, Allison RS, Wilkinson F, Wilcox LM. Monovision: Consequences for depth perception from large disparities. Exp Eye Res. 2019 Jun;183:62-67. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
PMID: 30237103BACKGROUNDLam AKN, To E, Weinreb RN, Yu M, Mak H, Lai G, Chiu V, Wu K, Zhang X, Cheng TPH, Guo PY, Leung CKS. Use of Virtual Reality Simulation to Identify Vision-Related Disability in Patients With Glaucoma. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020 May 1;138(5):490-498. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.0392.
PMID: 32191274BACKGROUNDDick HB, Ang RE, Corbett D, Hoffmann P, Tetz M, Villarrubia A, Palomino C, Castillo-Gomez A, Tsai L, Thomas EK, Janakiraman P. Comparison of 3-month visual outcomes of a new multifocal intraocular lens vs a trifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022 Nov 1;48(11):1270-1276. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000971. Epub 2022 May 12.
PMID: 35545816BACKGROUNDFerreira TB, Ribeiro FJ, Silva D, Matos AC, Gaspar S, Almeida S. Comparison of refractive and visual outcomes of 3 presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022 Mar 1;48(3):280-287. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000743.
PMID: 34321410BACKGROUNDRamulu PY, Swenor BK, Jefferys JL, Rubin GS. Description and validation of a test to evaluate sustained silent reading. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Jan 23;54(1):673-80. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-10617.
PMID: 23258146BACKGROUNDMangione CM, Lee PP, Gutierrez PR, Spritzer K, Berry S, Hays RD; National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire Field Test Investigators. Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001 Jul;119(7):1050-8. doi: 10.1001/archopht.119.7.1050.
PMID: 11448327BACKGROUNDMangione CM, Lee PP, Pitts J, Gutierrez P, Berry S, Hays RD. Psychometric properties of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ). NEI-VFQ Field Test Investigators. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998 Nov;116(11):1496-504. doi: 10.1001/archopht.116.11.1496.
PMID: 9823352BACKGROUNDPetrillo J, Cano SJ, McLeod LD, Coon CD. Using classical test theory, item response theory, and Rasch measurement theory to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures: a comparison of worked examples. Value Health. 2015 Jan;18(1):25-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.10.005.
PMID: 25595231BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christopher Leung, MD, MB ChB
The University of Hong Kong
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Patients will remain unaware of their specific study arm assignments until the completion of the study.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Clinical Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 23, 2023
First Posted
August 29, 2023
Study Start
October 1, 2023
Primary Completion
September 30, 2024
Study Completion
September 30, 2024
Last Updated
August 29, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Our plan is focused on publishing the analyzed results of our research through peer-review, journals and conference papers. We understand the importance of patient privacy and confidentiality. Therefore, we will not share any individual patient data with any third parties.