Intubation with Different Angled Intubation Tubes Using C-macr D Blade Videolaringoscope;
1 other identifier
interventional
54
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this study we compared post-operative sore throat, ease and time of intubation, hoarseness, subglottic damage and hemodynamic changes to orotracheal intubation using three different intubation stylets with C-MAC R videolaryngoscope D- blade.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 15, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 12, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 13, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 11, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 25, 2023
CompletedNovember 19, 2024
August 1, 2023
1.2 years
August 11, 2023
November 14, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
sore throat
For evaluation of sore throat, the patients were asked whether they had any throat pain. The severity of sore throat was graded as follows: 1: no sore throat, 2: minimal, 3: moderate, 4: severe
30 minutes, 4 hour, 12 hour, 24 hour
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Ease of intubation
2 minutes
Subglottic damage
2 hours
Study Arms (3)
Group A : 90 degree
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn this group patients were intubated using a 90 degree angled stylet with C-MAC D- Blade videolaryngoscope
Group B : 80 degree
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn this group patients were intubated using a 80 degree angled stylet with C-MAC D- Blade videolaryngoscope
Group C: 60 degree
ACTIVE COMPARATORIn this group patients were intubated using a 60 degree angled stylet with C-MAC D- Blade videolaryngoscope
Interventions
all patients were intubated using the C-MAC D-Blade videolaryngoscope but for each group the intubation tubes were angled in different degrees. First group was intubated using the stylet of 60 degrees, second group was intubated using the stylet of 80 degrees and the third group was intubated using the stylet of 90 degrees.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ASA score I-II
- Elective operations
- Supine pozition
- years
- No history of surgery in the last 6 months
- No history of airway related surgery
- No anticipated difficult airway
You may not qualify if:
- Abdomen, thorax, head-neck surgeries
- Smoker
- Chronic alcohol abuse
- Occupational inhaler agent exposure
- Patients with malignancies
- Patients with a history of radiotheraphy to head-neck region
- Patients with congenital anomalies at head-neck region
- Patients with diagnosed abnormalites of head -neck movements
- Non-cooperatied patients
- Non-oriented patients
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Yeditepe University
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alkım Gizem Yılmaz Selimoğlu
Yeditepe University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Ferdi Menda, Prof.
yYeditepe Universitu
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 11, 2023
First Posted
August 25, 2023
Study Start
March 15, 2021
Primary Completion
June 12, 2022
Study Completion
June 13, 2022
Last Updated
November 19, 2024
Record last verified: 2023-08