Pacing Characteristics of a Conventional Bipolar
1 other identifier
interventional
134
1 country
5
Brief Summary
Study Title: Pacing characteristics of a conventional bipolar, active fixation pacing lead for left bundle branch area pacing in patients with symptomatic bradycardia Study Objectives: To characterize an approach for left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) in patients with bradycardia indications for pacing and to assess implant success rate, safety, and long-term stability with a conventional bipolar, active fixation pacing lead. Methodology: Open-label, prospective, multi-center, non-randomized, single-arm study Study Endpoints: Primary Endpoint:
- Implant success rate Secondary Endpoints:
- Intra-operative procedure time and fluoroscopic exposure time
- Intra-operative intracardiac electrogram (EGM) changes: paced QRS duration, stimulus to left ventricular (LV) activation time, and LBB potential
- Post-operative imaging data: posteroanterior, left anterior oblique 30O, right anterior oblique 30O, Left lateral views
- Serial paced 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) and intracardiac EGM changes: QRS duration (QRSd), pacing-QRS interval, and new atrial fibrillation (AF)
- Serial echocardiography changes: left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left atrial (LA) and LV chamber size, and global longitudinal strain (GLS) of tissue Doppler imaging
- Serial changes of pacing parameters: capture threshold, impedance, and sensing amplitude for both atrial and ventricular Solia S leads
- Safety: Immediate (\< 24 hours), in-hospital, and chronic (12 months) adverse events
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2023
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 28, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 25, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 16, 2026
ExpectedMay 13, 2026
March 1, 2026
2.2 years
July 28, 2023
May 10, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Implant Success Rate
The purpose of the primary endpoint is to evaluate the overall success rate of the implanted system, including Solia ventricular lead to sense and deliver pacing at 12- month post-implant. Successful sensing performance at 12 months is the demonstrated ability to appropriately sense without intervention for undersensing (i.e., Solia leadrelated adverse event for lead undersensing or loss of sensing) in the period from implant to 12 months, except for normal pulse generator reprogramming. Successful pacing is the demonstrated ability at 12 months to deliver a stimulation pulse with capture, without intervention (i.e., Solia lead-related adverse event for intermittent capture or no lead capture) other than normal pulse generator reprogramming. Success is determined at the subject level.
Baseline, 12 months
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Intra-operative fluoroscopic exposure time
Baseline, 1 months, 3 months, 6 months ,and 12 months
Intra-operative intracardiac electrogram (EGM)
Baseline, 1 months, 3 months, 6 months ,and 12 months
Post-operative imaging data
baseline
Serial paced 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) and intracardiac EGM changes
Screen, Baseline, 1 months, 3 months, 6 months ,and 12 months
Serial echocardiography changes
baseline, 12 months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Solia S lead with any BIOTRONIK Pacemaker
OTHER* Name: Solia S lead with any BIOTRONIK Pacemaker * Model: Solia S45/S53/S60 * Manufacturer: BIOTRONIK SE \& Co. KG * Method of use: LBBAP implantation for all bradycardia indications. * Mechanism of action: (1) Pacemaker stimulates the cardiac tissue to keep stable heart beats in patients with bradycardia. (2) LBBAP can be an alternative to right ventricular (RV) pacing to reduce RV pacing-induced ventricular dyssynchrony. * Device category and grade: E3610 Cardiovascular devices, Class III
Interventions
* Name: Solia S lead with any BIOTRONIK Pacemaker * Model: Solia S45/S53/S60 * Manufacturer: BIOTRONIK SE \& Co. KG * Method of use: LBBAP implantation for all bradycardia indications. * Mechanism of action: (1) Pacemaker stimulates the cardiac tissue to keep stable heart beats in patients with bradycardia. (2) LBBAP can be an alternative to right ventricular (RV) pacing to reduce RV pacing-induced ventricular dyssynchrony. * Device category and grade: E3610 Cardiovascular devices, Class III
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients ≥ 20 years of age
- Standard bradycardia pacing indications requiring new ventricular lead implantation
- Able to give informed consent for the participation in the trial
You may not qualify if:
- Patients underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation
- New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class IV heart failure
- Life expectancy \< 1 year
- Right-sided approach for lead implantation
- Hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis patients
- Pregnant or breast-feeding women
- Abnormal baseline findings considered by the investigator to indicate conditions that might affect study endpoints
- Participation in another prospective interventional clinical study within a period of 4 weeks prior to the implantation of LBBAP
- Use of any recreational drugs or history of drug addiction
- Any other condition that, in the investigator's judgment, might increase the risk to the patients or decrease the chance of obtaining satisfactory data needed to achieve the objectives of the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Chang Gung Memorial Hospitallead
- Biotronik SE & Co. KGcollaborator
Study Sites (5)
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Linkou District, Taipei, 10507, Taiwan
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
China Medical University Hospital
Taichung, Taiwan
MacKay Memorial Hospital
Taipei, Taiwan
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Hospital
Yilan, Taiwan
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Chun Chieh Wang
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 28, 2023
First Posted
August 25, 2023
Study Start
January 1, 2023
Primary Completion
March 31, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 16, 2026
Last Updated
May 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03