NCT06006156

Brief Summary

The goal of the present randomized clinical trial is to assess the long-term osseous and peri-implant soft tissue changes as well as the success rate of short implants (6 mm) with a converging collar with micro threads or a diverging polished collar placed in the esthetic zone of the maxilla on partially edentulous patients. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • what are the long-term bone and soft tissue changes around implants with a converging collar with micro threads compared to a diverging polished collar placed in the esthetic zone of the maxilla?
  • What is the success rate of implants with a converging collar with micro threads compared to a diverging polished collar placed in the esthetic zone of the maxilla? Dental implants with a converging collar with micro threads or a diverging polished collar will be placed in the esthetic zone of the maxilla of the included participants and the measurements regarding the bone and soft tissue level will be compared.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
8mo left

Started Apr 2023

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress83%
Apr 2023Dec 2026

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2023

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 5, 2023

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 23, 2023

Completed
2.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 30, 2025

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

November 17, 2025

Status Verified

November 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.5 years

First QC Date

April 5, 2023

Last Update Submit

November 14, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

MaxillaPartially edentulousDental implantImplant supported prosthesis

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • height of the periimplant bone tissues

    The height of the periimplant bone tissues will be evaluated in the intraoral radiographic images, cone beam tomography, and the three-dimensional images obtained from the digital prints

    baseline

  • height of the periimplant bone tissues

    The height of the periimplant bone tissues will be evaluated in the intraoral radiographic images, cone beam tomography, and the three-dimensional images obtained from the digital prints

    3 years follow up

  • height of the periimplant soft tissues

    The height of the periimplant soft tissues will be evaluated in the intraoral radiographic images, cone beam tomography, and the three-dimensional images obtained from the digital prints

    Baseline

  • height of the periimplant soft tissues

    The height of the periimplant soft tissues will be evaluated in the intraoral radiographic images, cone beam tomography, and the three-dimensional images obtained from the digital prints

    3 years follow up

Secondary Outcomes (8)

  • Plaque index

    1 year

  • Plaque index

    3 year

  • Bleeding on probing

    1 year

  • Bleeding on probing

    3 year

  • Probing depth

    1 year

  • +3 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

dental implant with a convergent collar

EXPERIMENTAL

One implant with a converging collar with micro threads will be installed in each patient according to the site randomization in the esthetic region of the upper jaw (between the second premolars).

Procedure: Dental implants placement

dental implant with a divergent collar

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

One implant with a diverging polished collar will be installed in each patient according to the site randomization in the esthetic region of the upper jaw ( between the second premolars).

Procedure: Dental implants placement

Interventions

surgery for placement of two one-piece trans gingival implants

Also known as: implant supported prosthetic restoration
dental implant with a convergent collardental implant with a divergent collar

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Presence of at least two edentulous areas in the esthetic region of the maxilla (from right to left from second premolar to premolar, preferably first premolars and incisors)
  • Alveolar bone ≥ 8 mm in height and ≥ 5 mm in thickness assessed on CBCT.
  • Age of ≥ 21 years.
  • Need for an implant-supported prosthetic restoration.
  • Be in good general health with no contraindications to oral surgical procedures.
  • Not be pregnant.
  • Patients who agree to participate in the study and sign the informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • The presence of any uncontrolled systemic disease.
  • History of past or ongoing chemotherapeutic or radiotherapeutic treatments.
  • Heavy smokers (\>10 cigarettes per day).
  • Previous bone regeneration procedures in the area of interest

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Universidad Nacional de Trujillo

Trujillo, La Libertad, 13001, Peru

Location

Related Publications (17)

  • Agustin-Panadero R, Martinez-Martinez N, Fernandez-Estevan L, Faus-Lopez J, Sola-Ruiz MF. Influence of Transmucosal Area Morphology on Peri-Implant Bone Loss in Tissue-Level Implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 July/August;(34):947-952. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7329. Epub 2019 Feb 15.

  • Altaib FH, Alqutaibi AY, Al-Fahd A, Eid S. Short dental implant as alternative to long implant with bone augmentation of the atrophic posterior ridge: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs. Quintessence Int. 2019;50(8):636-650. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a42948.

  • Bitaraf T, Keshtkar A, Rokn AR, Monzavi A, Geramy A, Hashemi K. Comparing short dental implant and standard dental implant in terms of marginal bone level changes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Aug;21(4):796-812. doi: 10.1111/cid.12774. Epub 2019 May 1.

  • Buser D, Ingimarsson S, Dula K, Lussi A, Hirt HP, Belser UC. Long-term stability of osseointegrated implants in augmented bone: a 5-year prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002 Apr;22(2):109-17.

  • Caneva M, Lang NP, Calvo Guirado JL, Spriano S, Iezzi G, Botticelli D. Bone healing at bicortically installed implants with different surface configurations. An experimental study in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Mar;26(3):293-9. doi: 10.1111/clr.12475. Epub 2014 Sep 15.

  • Doyle AD, Wang FW, Matsumoto K, Yamada KM. One-dimensional topography underlies three-dimensional fibrillar cell migration. J Cell Biol. 2009 Feb 23;184(4):481-90. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200810041. Epub 2009 Feb 16.

  • Hermann JS, Jones AA, Bakaeen LG, Buser D, Schoolfield JD, Cochran DL. Influence of a machined collar on crestal bone changes around titanium implants: a histometric study in the canine mandible. J Periodontol. 2011 Sep;82(9):1329-38. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.090728. Epub 2011 Apr 12.

  • Papaspyridakos P, De Souza A, Vazouras K, Gholami H, Pagni S, Weber HP. Survival rates of short dental implants (</=6 mm) compared with implants longer than 6 mm in posterior jaw areas: A meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 16:8-20. doi: 10.1111/clr.13289.

  • Ravida A, Majzoub J, Alassadi M, Saleh MH, Askar H, Wang HL. Impact of Implant Length on Survival of Rough-Surface Implants in Nonaugmented Posterior Areas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 Nov/Dec;34(6):1359-1369. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7509.

  • Ravida A, Wang IC, Sammartino G, Barootchi S, Tattan M, Troiano G, Laino L, Marenzi G, Covani U, Wang HL. Prosthetic Rehabilitation of the Posterior Atrophic Maxilla, Short (</=6 mm) or Long (>/=10 mm) Dental Implants? A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis: Naples Consensus Report Working Group A. Implant Dent. 2019 Dec;28(6):590-602. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000919.

  • Rodriguez X, Navajas A, Vela X, Fortuno A, Jimenez J, Nevins M. Arrangement of Peri-implant Connective Tissue Fibers Around Platform-Switching Implants with Conical Abutments and Its Relationship to the Underlying Bone: A Human Histologic Study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2016 Jul-Aug;36(4):533-40. doi: 10.11607/prd.2580.

  • Rossi F, Botticelli D, Cesaretti G, De Santis E, Storelli S, Lang NP. Use of short implants (6 mm) in a single-tooth replacement: a 5-year follow-up prospective randomized controlled multicenter clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2016 Apr;27(4):458-64. doi: 10.1111/clr.12564. Epub 2015 Feb 18.

  • Rossi F, Lang NP, Ricci E, Ferraioli L, Baldi N, Botticelli D. Long-term follow-up of single crowns supported by short, moderately rough implants-A prospective 10-year cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Dec;29(12):1212-1219. doi: 10.1111/clr.13386. Epub 2018 Dec 6.

  • Rossi F, Lang NP, Ricci E, Ferraioli L, Marchetti C, Botticelli D. 6-mm-long implants loaded with fiber-reinforced composite resin-bonded fixed prostheses (FRCRBFDPs). A 5-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Dec;28(12):1478-1483. doi: 10.1111/clr.13015. Epub 2017 Mar 28.

  • Storelli S, Abba A, Scanferla M, Botticelli D, Romeo E. 6 mm vs 10 mm-long implants in the rehabilitation of posterior jaws: A 10-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018;11(3):283-292.

  • Szathvary I, Caneva M, Caneva M, Bressan E, Botticelli D, Meneghello R. A volumetric 3-D digital analysis of dimensional changes to the alveolar process at implants placed immediately into extraction sockets. J Oral Science Rehabilitation. 2015 Sep;1(1):62-9.

    RESULT
  • Welander M, Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T. Subcrestal placement of two-part implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Mar;20(3):226-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01637.x.

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Treatment assignments will be sealed in opaque envelopes that will be opened during the surgery. The treatment assignment will be disclosed to the surgeon after the elevation of the alveolar mucosal flaps and prior to the preparation of the recipient sites.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: The study is a split-mouth randomized controlled trial. One implant with a converging collar with micro threads or a diverging polished collar will be installed in each patient according to randomization in the esthetic region of the upper jaw ( between the second premolars ). It will be restored with individual crowns after three months of healing. Both implants will be placed with the rough margin of \~1 mm subcrestally.
Sponsor Type
NETWORK
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 5, 2023

First Posted

August 23, 2023

Study Start

April 1, 2023

Primary Completion

September 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Last Updated

November 17, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations