NCT06005571

Brief Summary

Research Problem : Advances in adhesive technologies have introduced several surface treatment concepts that enable the clinician to adhere resin-based composite restorations onto new composite materials. The service life of faulty direct composite restorations can be prolonged by composite repair wherein durable adhesion between old and new resin-based composite materials is established.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
43

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2022

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 10, 2022

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 30, 2022

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 18, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 22, 2023

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 15, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

March 6, 2025

Status Verified

March 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

June 18, 2023

Last Update Submit

March 5, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

SilaneSandblasting of tooth surfacesClinical trialdentine bondingComposite repairdefective restorations

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Assessment of the quality of the repaired restoration retention, colour match, marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation, anatomical form and surface roughness.

    Clinical examination and evaluation of the restoration quality according to the United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria as Alpha, Bravo and Charlie. Alpha scores mean a better outcome and Charlie scores mean worse outcome.

    2 years

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • The presence of postoperative sensitivity.

    2 years.

Study Arms (3)

Control: traditional acid etch treatment group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Traditional acid etching to the tooth and old restoration surfaces and then adhesive application.

Procedure: composite restoration repair by traditional acid etch treatment procedure and adhesive.

Silane-Adhesive treatment group

EXPERIMENTAL

Acid cid etching of prepared tooth tissues and old restoration surfaces, silane solution application, and then adhesive application.

Procedure: Composite restoration repair by acid etching, silane solution application, and then adhesive.

Sandblast-Silane-Adhesive treatment group

EXPERIMENTAL

First sandblasting the old composite filling surfaces, then acid etching of prepared tooth tissues the restoration, then silane application followed by adhesive application.

Procedure: Composite restoration repair by sandblasting first, then acid etching, silane solution application, and then adhesive.

Interventions

Recurrent caries surrounding the defective restoration was removed and the surfaces were coditoned with acid and adhesive then new repair composite was addded to repair the old restoration and restore the carious cavity.

Control: traditional acid etch treatment group

Recurrent caries surrounding the defective restoration was removed and the surfaces were coditoned with acid, then silane applied, next adhesive then new repair composite was addded to repair the old restoration and restore the carious cavity.

Silane-Adhesive treatment group

Recurrent caries surrounding the defective restoration was removed, the old restoration surface were sandblasted, and the tooth and restoration surfaces were coditoned with acid, then silane applied, next adhesive then new repair composite was added to repair the old restoration and restore the carious cavity.

Sandblast-Silane-Adhesive treatment group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Deciduous tooth
  • Sustained dentin hypersensitivity
  • Irreversible pulpitis , necrotic, or inadequately-treated endodontic teeth
  • Grossly defective composite restorations that were indicated for replacement.
  • Teeth with compromised periodontal status.
  • Patients with poor oral hygiene

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients older than 18 years.
  • Asymptomatic restored premolars or molars.
  • Vital or endodontically treated teeth
  • Patients with localized, marginal, anatomical deficiencies and/or carious lesions adjacent to composite restorations or esthetically unpleasant restorations.
  • Teeth with marginal gingivitis but healthy periodontium.
  • Tooth in normal occlusion with antagonist and at least one adjacent tooth.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Jordan University of Science and Technology

Irbid, 21110, Jordan

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Albashaireh ZSM, Maghaireh GA, Alsaafeen HN. Effects of silane coupling treatment on the clinical performance of direct repaired resin-based composite (RBC) restorations with or without prior surface sandblasting: A randomized controlled trial. J Dent. 2023 Dec;139:104740. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104740. Epub 2023 Oct 8.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Adhesives

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Specialty Uses of ChemicalsChemical Actions and UsesManufactured MaterialsTechnology, Industry, and Agriculture

Study Officials

  • Zakereyya Albashaireh, PhD

    Jordan University of Science and Technology

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The patients who participated in the study and the assessor of the treatment outcome did not know the type of treatment procedure received.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Three groups of patients were randomly assigned to three different treatment protocols of defective composite restoration repair.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor of restorative dentistry

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 18, 2023

First Posted

August 22, 2023

Study Start

March 10, 2022

Primary Completion

September 30, 2022

Study Completion

September 15, 2024

Last Updated

March 6, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

A consent has to be obtained from the faculty of graduate studies for sharing data as data form part of graduate students thesis.

Locations