Smartwatches for Detection of Atrial Fibrillation (AFib) in Secondary Prevention of Cryptogenic Stroke
WATCH AFib
1 other identifier
interventional
400
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Scientific Background: In secondary prevention of ischemic stroke, detection of atrial fibrillation (AFib) and subsequent anticoagulation therapy reduce the risk of recurrent stroke by approximately 60%. Prolonged electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring up to 6 months significantly increases detection of AFib in cryptogenic stroke. Wearables like smartwatches have recently been shown to adequately detect AFib in the general population. Thus, prolonged ECG monitoring after cryptogenic ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) using a smartwatch could lead to a reduction of recurrent stroke by prompting adequate anticoagulation therapy and may constitute a cost-effective, non-invasive, and broadly-available alternative to the current standard of care. Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that AFib detection via smartwatch in patients with cryptogenic TIA or ischemic stroke is accurate compared to an implantable event recorder. Methods: The investigators introduce a prospective, intraindividual-controlled, multicentre clinical study in patients with cryptogenic ischemic stroke or TIA. In addition to an implanted event recorder as indicated by clinical standard, included patients receive a smartwatch for detection of AFib. ECG-data from smartwatches will be continuously monitored by two independent cardiologists. As soon as AFib is confirmed, a doctoral appointment is set to evaluate start of anticoagulation. The follow-up period will be six months. The study consists of four study visits: a baseline visit, two phone visits at one and three months, and an end of trial visit at six months. Primary Objective: To compare smartwatch and event recorder based analysis for sensitivity and specificity of AFib detection per patient after six months
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 22, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 15, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2026
ExpectedDecember 13, 2024
November 1, 2024
1.4 years
August 1, 2023
December 9, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Sensitivity and Specificity of AFib Detection
To estimate and compare sensitivity and specificity for AFib detection per patient after six months (Comparison of smartwatch based, continuous, automated, cardiologist supervised rhythm analysis of photoplethysmography (PPG)- signal and patient activated 1-lead ECG with Event Recorder based, continuous, automated ECG rhythm analysis).
From baseline visit (V0) to the last follow-up at visit (V3) at six months
Secondary Outcomes (13)
To estimate and compare the positive and negative predictive values for AFib detection per patient
From baseline visit (V0) to the last follow-up at visit (V3) at six months
Sensitivity and specificity for AFib detection of the automated PPG-signal rhythm analysis
From baseline visit (V0) to the last follow-up at visit (V3) at six months
Sensitivity and specificity for the detection of any AFib episode
From baseline visit (V0) to the last follow-up at visit (V3) at six months
Sensitivity for the detection of AFib episodes >1 hour
From baseline visit (V0) to the last follow-up at visit (V3) at six months
Sensitivity and specificity of AFib detection per recorded/ per analyzable time (i.e., intervals in which the watch is actually worn/records an analyzable signal; per-protocol analysis)
From baseline visit (V0) to the last follow-up at visit (V3) at six months
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Application of Smartwatch
EXPERIMENTALApplication of smartwatch in addition to an implanted event recorder. Follow-up of 6 months
Interventions
Smartwatch with PPG- and 1-lead ECG derived analysis of cardiac arrhythmia. Analysis will be performed centrally at the Cardiology Core Lab at the Klinikum Rechts der Isar.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Implanted Event Recorder with telemedicinal function (e.g., Biotronik BioMon 3m ProMRI HomeMon or similar)
- Cryptogenic stroke (within the last six month) after full standard evaluation:
- Stroke detected by computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that is not lacunar (lacunar is defined as a subcortical infarct in the distribution of the small, penetrating cerebral arteries whose largest dimension is ≤1.5 cm on CT or ≤2.0 cm on MRI diffusion images)
- Absence of extracranial or intracranial atherosclerosis causing ≥50 percent luminal stenosis of the artery supplying the area of ischemia
- No major-risk cardioembolic source of embolism (i.e., no permanent or paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, sustained atrial flutter, intracardiac thrombus, prosthetic cardiac valve, atrial myxoma or other cardiac tumors, high-grade mitral valve stenosis, recent (within four weeks) myocardial infarction, left ventricular ejection fraction \<30 percent, valvular vegetations, or infective endocarditis)
- No other specific cause of stroke identified (e.g., arteritis, dissection, migraine, vasospasm, drug abuse)
- No paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in 72h of in-hospital ECG-monitoring, including at least one Holter- ECG for 24 hours.
- Cryptogenic TIA with definite cortical syndrome (aphasia, neglect or homonymous hemianopia) (within the last six month) after full standard evaluation (see above)
- Age: ≥40 yrs.
- At least one of the following risk factors:
- CHA2DS2VASc score ≥4
- Atrial runs
- Left atrial size \> 45mm
- Left atrial appendage flow ≤ 0.2m/s
- No contraindication for anticoagulant therapy after acute phase of stroke
- +1 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Patient is not able to perform 1-lead ECG recording with smartwatch
- Patient possesses no smartphone (iOS version ≥10.0 or Android)
- Implanted pacemaker or cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)
- Pregnancy and breastfeeding period
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München
Munich, 81675, Germany
Related Publications (14)
GBD 2016 Neurology Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019 May;18(5):459-480. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30499-X. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
PMID: 30879893BACKGROUNDSecondary prevention in non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation after transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke. EAFT (European Atrial Fibrillation Trial) Study Group. Lancet. 1993 Nov 20;342(8882):1255-62.
PMID: 7901582BACKGROUNDHart RG, Pearce LA, Koudstaal PJ. Transient ischemic attacks in patients with atrial fibrillation: implications for secondary prevention: the European Atrial Fibrillation Trial and Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation III trial. Stroke. 2004 Apr;35(4):948-51. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000120741.34866.1D. Epub 2004 Feb 26.
PMID: 14988571BACKGROUNDHart RG, Diener HC, Coutts SB, Easton JD, Granger CB, O'Donnell MJ, Sacco RL, Connolly SJ; Cryptogenic Stroke/ESUS International Working Group. Embolic strokes of undetermined source: the case for a new clinical construct. Lancet Neurol. 2014 Apr;13(4):429-38. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70310-7.
PMID: 24646875BACKGROUNDSanna T, Diener HC, Passman RS, Di Lazzaro V, Bernstein RA, Morillo CA, Rymer MM, Thijs V, Rogers T, Beckers F, Lindborg K, Brachmann J; CRYSTAL AF Investigators. Cryptogenic stroke and underlying atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2014 Jun 26;370(26):2478-86. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1313600.
PMID: 24963567BACKGROUNDGladstone DJ, Spring M, Dorian P, Panzov V, Thorpe KE, Hall J, Vaid H, O'Donnell M, Laupacis A, Cote R, Sharma M, Blakely JA, Shuaib A, Hachinski V, Coutts SB, Sahlas DJ, Teal P, Yip S, Spence JD, Buck B, Verreault S, Casaubon LK, Penn A, Selchen D, Jin A, Howse D, Mehdiratta M, Boyle K, Aviv R, Kapral MK, Mamdani M; EMBRACE Investigators and Coordinators. Atrial fibrillation in patients with cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2014 Jun 26;370(26):2467-77. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1311376.
PMID: 24963566BACKGROUNDTsivgoulis G, Katsanos AH, Mac Grory B, Kohrmann M, Ricci BA, Tsioufis K, Cutting S, Krogias C, Schellinger PD, Campello AR, Cuadrado-Godia E, Gladstone DJ, Sanna T, Wachter R, Furie K, Alexandrov AV, Yaghi S. Prolonged Cardiac Rhythm Monitoring and Secondary Stroke Prevention in Patients With Cryptogenic Cerebral Ischemia. Stroke. 2019 Aug;50(8):2175-2180. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025169. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
PMID: 31216964BACKGROUNDPerez MV, Mahaffey KW, Hedlin H, Rumsfeld JS, Garcia A, Ferris T, Balasubramanian V, Russo AM, Rajmane A, Cheung L, Hung G, Lee J, Kowey P, Talati N, Nag D, Gummidipundi SE, Beatty A, Hills MT, Desai S, Granger CB, Desai M, Turakhia MP; Apple Heart Study Investigators. Large-Scale Assessment of a Smartwatch to Identify Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2019 Nov 14;381(20):1909-1917. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1901183.
PMID: 31722151BACKGROUNDTison GH, Sanchez JM, Ballinger B, Singh A, Olgin JE, Pletcher MJ, Vittinghoff E, Lee ES, Fan SM, Gladstone RA, Mikell C, Sohoni N, Hsieh J, Marcus GM. Passive Detection of Atrial Fibrillation Using a Commercially Available Smartwatch. JAMA Cardiol. 2018 May 1;3(5):409-416. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0136.
PMID: 29562087BACKGROUNDDorr M, Nohturfft V, Brasier N, Bosshard E, Djurdjevic A, Gross S, Raichle CJ, Rhinisperger M, Stockli R, Eckstein J. The WATCH AF Trial: SmartWATCHes for Detection of Atrial Fibrillation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Feb;5(2):199-208. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.10.006. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
PMID: 30784691BACKGROUNDWasserlauf J, You C, Patel R, Valys A, Albert D, Passman R. Smartwatch Performance for the Detection and Quantification of Atrial Fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2019 Jun;12(6):e006834. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.118.006834.
PMID: 31113234BACKGROUNDAfzal MR, Gunda S, Waheed S, Sehar N, Maybrook RJ, Dawn B, Lakkireddy D. Role of Outpatient Cardiac Rhythm Monitoring in Cryptogenic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 Oct;38(10):1236-45. doi: 10.1111/pace.12688. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
PMID: 26172621BACKGROUNDDing EY, CastanedaAvila M, Tran KV, Mehawej J, Filippaios A, Paul T, Otabil EM, Noorishirazi K, Han D, Saczynski JS, Barton B, Mazor KM, Chon K, McManus DD. Usability of a smartwatch for atrial fibrillation detection in older adults after stroke. Cardiovasc Digit Health J. 2022 Apr 18;3(3):126-135. doi: 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2022.03.003. eCollection 2022 Jun.
PMID: 35720675BACKGROUNDPoli S, Diedler J, Hartig F, Gotz N, Bauer A, Sachse T, Muller K, Muller I, Stimpfle F, Duckheim M, Steeg M, Eick C, Schreieck J, Gawaz M, Ziemann U, Zuern CS. Insertable cardiac monitors after cryptogenic stroke--a risk factor based approach to enhance the detection rate for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Eur J Neurol. 2016 Feb;23(2):375-81. doi: 10.1111/ene.12843. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
PMID: 26470854BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 1, 2023
First Posted
August 22, 2023
Study Start
October 15, 2024
Primary Completion
March 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2026
Last Updated
December 13, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-11