NCT06004895

Brief Summary

Dry eye disease is a common condition affecting millions worldwide and costing millions in healthcare due to reduced work productivity and quality of life. The disruption of oil glands in our eyelids known as Meibomian glands, which produce the oily layer of our tears to protect it from evaporating, is one of the most common contributors of dry eye disease. Much effort has been put into developing effective treatments for this condition as new treatments are constantly being introduced to the market. The purpose of this clinical trial is to investigate how proven light-based therapies work in treating dry eye disease and oil gland disruption. These therapies include intense-pulsed light therapy (IPL) which uses a series of light flashes on the facial skin surface, and low-level light therapy (LLLT) which uses a mask with a series of light-emitting diodes (LEDs) to warm the body cells. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. 1.What are the short- and long-term changes associated with these treatments on the eyelids and surface of the eyes?
  2. 2.Does LLLT alone work better than IPL+LLLT in treating dry eye disease and oil gland disruption?

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
26

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2023

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 15, 2023

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 22, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 25, 2023

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 29, 2024

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 23, 2025

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

February 5, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.1 years

First QC Date

August 15, 2023

Results QC Date

June 16, 2025

Last Update Submit

January 19, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Intense pulsed light therapyLow-level light therapy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change From Baseline in Non-invasive Tear Break Up Time to the Final Follow-up 3 Months After Final Treatment Session

    Measure of the stability of tears and how fast the tears evaporate in seconds using the Oculus Keratograph 5M instrument. An average of 3 measurements is obtained.

    Baseline and 3 months after final treatment session (up to 6 months after Baseline)

Secondary Outcomes (24)

  • Change From Baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index Scores to the Final Follow-up 3 Months After Final Treatment Session

    Baseline up to 3 months after final treatment session (up to 6 months after Baseline)

  • Change From Baseline in 5-Item Dry Eye Questionnaire Scores to the Final Follow-up 3 Months After Final Treatment Session

    Baseline up to 3 months after final treatment session (up to 6 months after Baseline)

  • Change From Baseline in Tear Meniscus Height to the Final Follow-up 3 Months After Final Treatment Session

    Baseline up to 3 months after final treatment session (up to 6 months after Baseline)

  • Change From Baseline in Lipid Layer Pattern Grading to the Final Follow-up 3 Months After Final Treatment Session

    Baseline up to 3 months after final treatment session (up to 6 months after Baseline)

  • Change From Baseline in Bulbar Conjunctival Hyperaemia to the Final Follow-up 3 Months After Final Treatment Session

    Baseline up to 3 months after final treatment session (up to 6 months after Baseline)

  • +19 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (6)

  • Change From Baseline in Blood Perfusion of Lower Eyelid to the Final Follow-up 3 Months After Final Treatment Session

    Baseline up to 3 months after final treatment session (up to 6 months after Baseline)

  • Change From Baseline in Microvasculature Blood Oxygen Saturation of Lower Eyelid to the Final Follow-up 3 Months After Final Treatment Session

    Baseline up to 3 months after final treatment session (up to 6 months after Baseline)

  • Change From Baseline in Relative Erythrocyte Fraction Volume of Lower Eyelid to the Final Follow-up 3 Months After Final Treatment Session

    Baseline up to 3 months after final treatment session (up to 6 months after Baseline)

  • +3 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Actual IPL and LLLT

EXPERIMENTAL

IPL and LLLT will be administered using the Espansione Group Ltd Eye-light unit. Five pulses of IPL will be administered along the lower lid region of the eye after the Pult meiboscore and Fitzpatrick skin grading has been entered into the unit. LLLT consisting of a wearable facial mask with red LEDs is then administered for 15 minutes.

Device: Actual IPLDevice: LLLT

Sham IPL and LLLT

SHAM COMPARATOR

Sham IPL will be administered by placing a separate empty IPL cartridge on the lower eyelid regions of the patient's other eye while a working IPL cartridge (Espansione Group Ltd Eye-light unit) simulates a light pulse pointed away from the patient's face, after entering the Pult meiboscore and Fitzpatrick skin grading into the unit. Five simulated pulses will be administered. LLLT consisting of a wearable facial mask with red LEDs is then administered for 15 minutes.

Device: Sham IPLDevice: LLLT

Interventions

LLLTDEVICE

Mask with LEDs transferring a total of about 32 J/cm\^2 of energy to facial and eyelids region with their eyes closed

Actual IPL and LLLTSham IPL and LLLT

Five light pulses along lower lid region of one eye of the participant ranging from 59 to 69 Joules (J) over an area of 2.5cm by 4.5cm for each pulse

Actual IPL and LLLT
Sham IPLDEVICE

Simulated five light pulses along lower lid region of the other eye of the same participant

Sham IPL and LLLT

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Individuals with dry eye disease symptoms (Ocular Surface Disease Index questionnaire (OSDI) score ≥ 13 or Dry Eye Questionnaire (DEQ5) score \> 6) and signs (tear film instability measured with non-invasive tear break-up time \< 10 s or ocular surface damage measured using special dyes placed on the front surface of the eyes that temporarily stains any aggravated or damaged cells: \> 5 corneal spots, \> 9 conjunctival spots or lid margin staining ≥ 2mm in length and ≥ 25% in width) (Wolffsohn et al., 2017)
  • Individuals need to also have Meibomian gland dysfunction. The diagnosis of Meibomian gland dysfunction depends on how many of 5 glands in the central lower eyelid can express oil, and the quality of the oil. A diagnosis is made if there is decreased expressibility (grade 1-3 on the Pflugfelder scale) and reduced quality of oil (grade 1-3 on Bron scale). Any presence of gland blockage and/or loss of oil glands grade 2 to grade 4 of either eyelid \[Pult and Reide-Pult, 2013\]) will also justify a diagnosis of Meibomian gland dysfunction
  • Age ≥ 18 years, male or female
  • Able to provide written consent in English
  • Able to attend multiple visits (4 treatment visits) and followed up for 2 weeks and 3 months after final treatment

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnancy
  • Contraindications to IPL treatment (Individuals with darker skin types - Fitzpatrick skin type V or VI, photosensitive epilepsy, tattoos, implants, electrical or acoustic prosthetics, semi-permanent make-up, pigmented lesions or skin cancer in the treatment area, pacemakers, use of photosensitising medication the past 3 months or during treatment period)
  • Facial or ocular IPL or LLLT treatment within the past 6 months or during study period in addition to those provided in the study
  • Use of topical medical eyedrops in the past 3 months or during study period
  • Contact lens wear in the past 2 weeks or during study period
  • Systemic conditions that can cause dry eye disease or corneal nerve loss including diabetes and Sjögren's syndrome
  • Other active ocular surface diseases or history of ocular surgery or corneal infections
  • Individuals with 1 eye

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Aston Dry Eye Clinic

Birmingham, West Midlands, B4 7ET, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Tomlinson A, Bron AJ, Korb DR, Amano S, Paugh JR, Pearce EI, Yee R, Yokoi N, Arita R, Dogru M. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the diagnosis subcommittee. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Mar 30;52(4):2006-49. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6997f. Print 2011 Mar. No abstract available.

    PMID: 21450918BACKGROUND
  • Pult H, Riede-Pult B. Comparison of subjective grading and objective assessment in meibography. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2013 Feb;36(1):22-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2012.10.074. Epub 2012 Oct 27.

    PMID: 23108007BACKGROUND
  • Wolffsohn JS, Arita R, Chalmers R, Djalilian A, Dogru M, Dumbleton K, Gupta PK, Karpecki P, Lazreg S, Pult H, Sullivan BD, Tomlinson A, Tong L, Villani E, Yoon KC, Jones L, Craig JP. TFOS DEWS II Diagnostic Methodology report. Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul;15(3):539-574. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 Jul 20.

    PMID: 28736342BACKGROUND
  • Schiffman RM, Christianson MD, Jacobsen G, Hirsch JD, Reis BL. Reliability and validity of the Ocular Surface Disease Index. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000 May;118(5):615-21. doi: 10.1001/archopht.118.5.615.

    PMID: 10815152BACKGROUND
  • Chalmers RL, Begley CG, Caffery B. Validation of the 5-Item Dry Eye Questionnaire (DEQ-5): Discrimination across self-assessed severity and aqueous tear deficient dry eye diagnoses. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2010 Apr;33(2):55-60. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2009.12.010. Epub 2010 Jan 25.

    PMID: 20093066BACKGROUND
  • Arita R, Minoura I, Morishige N, Shirakawa R, Fukuoka S, Asai K, Goto T, Imanaka T, Nakamura M. Development of Definitive and Reliable Grading Scales for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 Sep;169:125-137. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.06.025. Epub 2016 Jun 23.

    PMID: 27345733BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dry Eye SyndromesMeibomian Gland Dysfunction

Interventions

Low-Level Light Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lacrimal Apparatus DiseasesEye DiseasesEyelid Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Laser TherapyTherapeuticsPhototherapy

Results Point of Contact

Title
Professor James S Wolffsohn
Organization
Aston University

Study Officials

  • James S Wolffsohn, PhD

    Aston University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
Yes
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: One eye of the participant is randomised to receiving IPL and LLLT, while the other eye of the same participant will receive sham intense pulsed light therapy and low-level light therapy.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 15, 2023

First Posted

August 22, 2023

Study Start

October 25, 2023

Primary Completion

November 29, 2024

Study Completion

December 30, 2025

Last Updated

February 5, 2026

Results First Posted

July 23, 2025

Record last verified: 2026-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Deidentified datasets will be available upon request.

Time Frame
Deidentified datasets will be available upon request.
Access Criteria
Deidentified datasets will be available upon request.

Locations