Serum and Tissue Metabolite-based Prediction of Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Cancer
1 other identifier
observational
2,400
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Breast cancer is a malignant tumor with the highest morbidity and mortality among women worldwide. Accurate staging of axillary lymph nodes is critical for metastatic assessment and decisions regarding treatment modalities in breast cancer patient. Among patients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy, about 70 % of the patients had negative pathological results and in other words, these 70 % of the patients received unnecessary surgery. At present, imaging and pathological diagnosis is the main measure of lymph node metastasis in breast cancer. However, limitations remained. Artificial intelligence, including deep learning and machine learning algorithms, has emerged as a possible technique, which can make a more accuracy prediction through machine-based collection, learning and processing of previous information, especially in radiology and pathology-based diagnosis. With the intensification of the concept of precision medicine and the development of non-invasive technology, the investigators intend to use the artificial intelligence technology to develop a serum and tissue-based predictive model for sentinel lymph node metastasis diagnosis combined with imaging and pathological information, providing specific, efficient and non-invasive biological indicators for the monitoring and early intervention of lymph node metastasis in patient with breast cancer. Therefore, the investigators retrospectively include serum samples from early breast cancer patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy, including a discovery cohort and a modeling cohort. Metabolites were detected and screened in the discovery cohort and then as the target metabolites for targeted detection in the modeling cohort. Combined with preoperative imaging and pathological information, a prediction model of breast cancer sentinel lymph node metastasis based on serum metabolites would be established. Subsequently, multi-center breast cancer patients will prospectively be included to verify the accuracy and stability of the model.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2021
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 14, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 21, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2026
ExpectedSeptember 28, 2023
September 1, 2023
3 years
August 14, 2023
September 26, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Metabolic difference detection
Serum metabolites difference between breast cancer patients with and without sentinel lymph node metastasis would be analyzed, and potential biological indicators found.
From January 01, 2021 to December 31, 2021
Predictive model establishment
Combined with preoperative imaging and pathological information, a predictive model of sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer would be established based on the metabolic difference.
From January 01, 2022 to December 31, 2022
Predictive model validation
Verify the stability and accuracy of our model in larger cohorts and promote clinical translation.
From January 01, 2023 to December 31, 2023
Study Arms (3)
Discovering cohort
Discovering cohort was used for the discovery and screening of metabolic differences. Two groups were included-SLN+ group and SLN- group, meaning the breast cancer patients with/without sentinel lymph node metastasis respectively. Abundance and distribution of serum and tissue metabolites in this cohort of patients would be observed.
Modeling cohort
Modeling cohort refer to the cohort of patients included for targeted metabolites detection. Two groups were included-SLN+ group and SLN- group. Abundance and distribution of targeted metabolites in this cohort of patients would be detected, and a predictive model would be established using the data of this cohort.
Validation cohort
Validation cohort means a cohort of patients included to validate the prediction model established in the modeling stage. Patients of validation cohort will be enrolled from several different hospitals. Also, it included SLN+ group and SLN- group. Abundance and distribution of targeted metabolites in this cohort of patients would be detected, and the accuracy and stability of prediction model will be verified in this cohort.
Eligibility Criteria
Retrospective cohort: The study retrospectively collected data from 724 patients with early breast cancer. Prospective cohort: We expected the accuracy of our predictive model reached 96%, and given an estimated dropout rate of 10%. We needed to include at least 586 breast cancer in the prospective cohort. Therefore, we plan to prospectively enroll serum samples from 586 breast cancer patients to detect the abundance of metabolites and collect the radiological and pathological information from these patients for the following analysis.
You may qualify if:
- Pathological diagnosis of breast cancer
- No preoperative therapy including chemotherapy or endocrine therapy
- No distant metastasis
- Underwent mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery with sentinel lymph node biopsy
- Agreed to provide preoperative peripheral blood samples
- Had access to imaging, pathological and follow-up data for preoperative and postoperative evaluation of the disease
You may not qualify if:
- Neoadjuvant therapy
- Presence of distant metastasis at time of diagnosis
- Primary malignancies other than breast cancer
- Bilateral breast cancer or previous contralateral breast cancer
- Undergo modified radical surgery for breast cancer without sentinel lymph node biopsy
- Incomplete pathological data and follow-up data
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Shantou Central Hospitallead
- Zhejiang Cancer Hospitalcollaborator
- Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Research Institutecollaborator
- Shenshan Medical Center of Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospitalcollaborator
- Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Shantou Central Hospital
Shantou, Guangdong, China
Related Publications (8)
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
PMID: 33538338BACKGROUNDXu Y, Su GH, Ma D, Xiao Y, Shao ZM, Jiang YZ. Technological advances in cancer immunity: from immunogenomics to single-cell analysis and artificial intelligence. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2021 Aug 20;6(1):312. doi: 10.1038/s41392-021-00729-7.
PMID: 34417437BACKGROUNDZhou H, Zhu L, Song J, Wang G, Li P, Li W, Luo P, Sun X, Wu J, Liu Y, Zhu S, Zhang Y. Liquid biopsy at the frontier of detection, prognosis and progression monitoring in colorectal cancer. Mol Cancer. 2022 Mar 25;21(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12943-022-01556-2.
PMID: 35337361BACKGROUNDRichard V, Davey MG, Annuk H, Miller N, Kerin MJ. The double agents in liquid biopsy: promoter and informant biomarkers of early metastases in breast cancer. Mol Cancer. 2022 Apr 4;21(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12943-022-01506-y.
PMID: 35379239BACKGROUNDChayakulkheeree J, Pungrassami D, Prueksadee J. Performance of breast magnetic resonance imaging in axillary nodal staging in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. Pol J Radiol. 2019 Oct 18;84:e413-e418. doi: 10.5114/pjr.2019.89690. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31969959BACKGROUNDAlimirzaie S, Bagherzadeh M, Akbari MR. Liquid biopsy in breast cancer: A comprehensive review. Clin Genet. 2019 Jun;95(6):643-660. doi: 10.1111/cge.13514. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
PMID: 30671931BACKGROUNDIsaksen JL, Baumert M, Hermans ANL, Maleckar M, Linz D. Artificial intelligence for the detection, prediction, and management of atrial fibrillation. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2022 Mar;33(1):34-41. doi: 10.1007/s00399-022-00839-x. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
PMID: 35147766BACKGROUNDBi WL, Hosny A, Schabath MB, Giger ML, Birkbak NJ, Mehrtash A, Allison T, Arnaout O, Abbosh C, Dunn IF, Mak RH, Tamimi RM, Tempany CM, Swanton C, Hoffmann U, Schwartz LH, Gillies RJ, Huang RY, Aerts HJWL. Artificial intelligence in cancer imaging: Clinical challenges and applications. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Mar;69(2):127-157. doi: 10.3322/caac.21552. Epub 2019 Feb 5.
PMID: 30720861BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Xiaorong Lin, Dr.
Shantou Central Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hai Hu, Pro.
Zhejiang Cancer Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Zhiyong Wu, Dr.
Shantou Central Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- OTHER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 14, 2023
First Posted
August 21, 2023
Study Start
January 1, 2021
Primary Completion
December 31, 2023
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 31, 2026
Last Updated
September 28, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-09