Credibility of Ultrasound Detection of Female Genital Prolapse Mesh
KIDS
1 other identifier
observational
120
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the study is to investigate the credibility of ultrasound in detection of synthetic polypropylene vaginal implants. In detail, the study investigates if the ultrasound examiner experience and the standard method of examination may affect the detection of synthetic polypropylene vaginal implants by ultrasound. The primary hypothesis is if 90% of prolapse mesh could be detected by the ultrasound examiners who are blinded to the previous prolapse surgery, the ultrasound is credible for prolapse mesh detection. The secondary hypothesis is if the ultrasound detection is not significantly different between the ultrasound examiners, the method of ultrasound examination is mandatory to acheive credible ultrasound detection of the prolapse mesh.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Oct 2018
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 21, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 21, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 21, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 16, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 21, 2023
CompletedAugust 22, 2023
August 1, 2023
2 months
February 16, 2023
August 18, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Detection of which mesh without being informed of previous surgery
Without being informed of previous surgery, examiners are to separately diagnose which mesh vs no mesh
Maximum of 10 minutes for all examination
Precision of mesh detection
Being informed of which surgery, examiners are to separately measure the midsagittal lengths of the mesh.
Maximum of 10 minutes for all examination
Study Arms (4)
Uphold™ Lite Vaginal mesh - Boston Scientific (Anterior)
Patients previousely received the Uphold™ Lite for the surgical management of apical and/or anterior vaginal mesh prolapse.
Pinnacle posterior Vaginal mesh - Boston Scientific
Patients previousely received the Pinnacle posterior Vaginal mesh for the surgical management of posterior and/or apical vaginal mesh prolapse.
Artisyn® Y-Shaped Mesh (Robotic-assisted Sacral colpopexy)
Patients previousely received the Artisyn® Y-Shaped Mesh via robotic-assisted approach Patients previousely received th Artisyn® Y-Shaped Mesh via robotic-assisted approach for the surgical management of apical prolapse..
Native tissue repair
Patients previousely received native tissue repair for the surgical management of prolapse.
Interventions
Each examiner to answer: 1. Is there a mesh or not: Yes or No 2. If Yes: * Which type of mesh? Uphold, Pinnacle Posterior or Artisyn® Y-Shaped Mesh * What is the length of the mesh in a single midsagittal view image 3. Examination record time is to be registered.
Each examiner to answer: 1. Is there a mesh or not: Yes or No 2. If Yes: * Which type of mesh? Uphold, Pinnacle Posterior or Artisyn® Y-Shaped Mesh * What is the length of the mesh in a single midsagittal view image 3. Examination record time is to be registered.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients operated by one of the procedures: 1. Anterior TVM (Uphold™ Lite Vaginal mesh - Boston Scientific. 2. Posterior POP mesh (Pinnacle posterior - Boston Scientific or equal) 3. Y-shaped mesh via robotic assisted sacroclpopexy (Artisyn® Y-Shaped Mesh - Ethicon or equal). 4. patients received anterior and/or posterior colporraphy i.e. native tissue repair i.e. no synthetic materials used (control group).
You may qualify if:
- Patients operated by one of the procedures mentioned 1. Anterior TVM (Uphold™ Lite Vaginal mesh - Boston Scientific. 2. Posterior POP mesh (Pinnacle posterior - Boston Scientific or equal) 3. Y-shaped mesh via robotic assisted sacroclpopexy (Artisyn® Y-Shaped Mesh - Ethicon or equal). and 4. patients received anterior and/or posterior colporraphy i.e. native tissue repair i.e. no synthetic materials used (control group).
- All patients should have suffered prolapse symptoms before surgery such as pelvic heaviness and/or vaginal bulging, extra.
- Being able to make an informed consent on participation
- Physically and cognitively capable of participating in the examination
You may not qualify if:
- Patients operated by different procedures t.ex. two different mesh types
- Advanced procedure in the pelvic floor such as current pelvic organ cancer (regardless of treatment)
- Other clinically relevant pelvic disorders for which surgery with other materials (not polypropylene mesh) was previously provided.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institutet Danderyd University Hospital
Stockholm, 18288, Sweden
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Edward Morcos, MD, PhD
Karolinska Institutet - Danderyds Sjukhus (KIDS)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD, PhD. Senior Consultant.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 16, 2023
First Posted
August 21, 2023
Study Start
October 21, 2018
Primary Completion
December 21, 2018
Study Completion
December 21, 2018
Last Updated
August 22, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
IPD is only available to the principal investigator.