NCT06000215

Brief Summary

The aim of the study is to investigate the credibility of ultrasound in detection of synthetic polypropylene vaginal implants. In detail, the study investigates if the ultrasound examiner experience and the standard method of examination may affect the detection of synthetic polypropylene vaginal implants by ultrasound. The primary hypothesis is if 90% of prolapse mesh could be detected by the ultrasound examiners who are blinded to the previous prolapse surgery, the ultrasound is credible for prolapse mesh detection. The secondary hypothesis is if the ultrasound detection is not significantly different between the ultrasound examiners, the method of ultrasound examination is mandatory to acheive credible ultrasound detection of the prolapse mesh.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
120

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2018

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 21, 2018

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 21, 2018

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 21, 2018

Completed
4.2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

February 16, 2023

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 21, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

August 22, 2023

Status Verified

August 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

February 16, 2023

Last Update Submit

August 18, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Detection of which mesh without being informed of previous surgery

    Without being informed of previous surgery, examiners are to separately diagnose which mesh vs no mesh

    Maximum of 10 minutes for all examination

  • Precision of mesh detection

    Being informed of which surgery, examiners are to separately measure the midsagittal lengths of the mesh.

    Maximum of 10 minutes for all examination

Study Arms (4)

Uphold™ Lite Vaginal mesh - Boston Scientific (Anterior)

Patients previousely received the Uphold™ Lite for the surgical management of apical and/or anterior vaginal mesh prolapse.

Diagnostic Test: Perineal/introital ultrasound examination, two different examiners. The examiners are blinded to each other and to the previous prolapse surgery.Diagnostic Test: Perineal/introital ultrasound examination, two different examiners. The examiners is now being informed of the previous prolapse surgery.

Pinnacle posterior Vaginal mesh - Boston Scientific

Patients previousely received the Pinnacle posterior Vaginal mesh for the surgical management of posterior and/or apical vaginal mesh prolapse.

Diagnostic Test: Perineal/introital ultrasound examination, two different examiners. The examiners are blinded to each other and to the previous prolapse surgery.Diagnostic Test: Perineal/introital ultrasound examination, two different examiners. The examiners is now being informed of the previous prolapse surgery.

Artisyn® Y-Shaped Mesh (Robotic-assisted Sacral colpopexy)

Patients previousely received the Artisyn® Y-Shaped Mesh via robotic-assisted approach Patients previousely received th Artisyn® Y-Shaped Mesh via robotic-assisted approach for the surgical management of apical prolapse..

Diagnostic Test: Perineal/introital ultrasound examination, two different examiners. The examiners are blinded to each other and to the previous prolapse surgery.Diagnostic Test: Perineal/introital ultrasound examination, two different examiners. The examiners is now being informed of the previous prolapse surgery.

Native tissue repair

Patients previousely received native tissue repair for the surgical management of prolapse.

Diagnostic Test: Perineal/introital ultrasound examination, two different examiners. The examiners are blinded to each other and to the previous prolapse surgery.Diagnostic Test: Perineal/introital ultrasound examination, two different examiners. The examiners is now being informed of the previous prolapse surgery.

Interventions

Each examiner to answer: 1. Is there a mesh or not: Yes or No 2. If Yes: * Which type of mesh? Uphold, Pinnacle Posterior or Artisyn® Y-Shaped Mesh * What is the length of the mesh in a single midsagittal view image 3. Examination record time is to be registered.

Also known as: Vaginal ultrasound examination, two different examiners. The examiners are blinded to each other and to the previous prolapse surgery
Artisyn® Y-Shaped Mesh (Robotic-assisted Sacral colpopexy)Native tissue repairPinnacle posterior Vaginal mesh - Boston ScientificUphold™ Lite Vaginal mesh - Boston Scientific (Anterior)

Each examiner to answer: 1. Is there a mesh or not: Yes or No 2. If Yes: * Which type of mesh? Uphold, Pinnacle Posterior or Artisyn® Y-Shaped Mesh * What is the length of the mesh in a single midsagittal view image 3. Examination record time is to be registered.

Also known as: Vaginal ultrasound examination, two different examiners. The examiners is now being informed of the previous prolapse surgery.
Artisyn® Y-Shaped Mesh (Robotic-assisted Sacral colpopexy)Native tissue repairPinnacle posterior Vaginal mesh - Boston ScientificUphold™ Lite Vaginal mesh - Boston Scientific (Anterior)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 99 Years
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsPatients are only females previousely received surgery for female genital prolapse.
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Patients operated by one of the procedures: 1. Anterior TVM (Uphold™ Lite Vaginal mesh - Boston Scientific. 2. Posterior POP mesh (Pinnacle posterior - Boston Scientific or equal) 3. Y-shaped mesh via robotic assisted sacroclpopexy (Artisyn® Y-Shaped Mesh - Ethicon or equal). 4. patients received anterior and/or posterior colporraphy i.e. native tissue repair i.e. no synthetic materials used (control group).

You may qualify if:

  • Patients operated by one of the procedures mentioned 1. Anterior TVM (Uphold™ Lite Vaginal mesh - Boston Scientific. 2. Posterior POP mesh (Pinnacle posterior - Boston Scientific or equal) 3. Y-shaped mesh via robotic assisted sacroclpopexy (Artisyn® Y-Shaped Mesh - Ethicon or equal). and 4. patients received anterior and/or posterior colporraphy i.e. native tissue repair i.e. no synthetic materials used (control group).
  • All patients should have suffered prolapse symptoms before surgery such as pelvic heaviness and/or vaginal bulging, extra.
  • Being able to make an informed consent on participation
  • Physically and cognitively capable of participating in the examination

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients operated by different procedures t.ex. two different mesh types
  • Advanced procedure in the pelvic floor such as current pelvic organ cancer (regardless of treatment)
  • Other clinically relevant pelvic disorders for which surgery with other materials (not polypropylene mesh) was previously provided.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institutet Danderyd University Hospital

Stockholm, 18288, Sweden

Location

Study Officials

  • Edward Morcos, MD, PhD

    Karolinska Institutet - Danderyds Sjukhus (KIDS)

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD, PhD. Senior Consultant.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

February 16, 2023

First Posted

August 21, 2023

Study Start

October 21, 2018

Primary Completion

December 21, 2018

Study Completion

December 21, 2018

Last Updated

August 22, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

IPD is only available to the principal investigator.

Locations