The Comparison of the Analgesic Effects of Dezocine and Sufentanil in Patient-controlled Analgesia After Laryngectomy
1 other identifier
interventional
129
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Laryngeal cancer is one of the most common tumors in otolaryngology. In China, it accounts for 1-5% of all malignancies and has an incidence of 1.13 per 100,000. Surgical resection is the most important treatment for patients who are not candidates for chemoradiotherapy or refuse chemoradiotherapy. The types of surgery include total and partial laryngectomy. Patients with laryngeal cancer often face multiple physical and psychiatric changes after surgery, such as daily large sputum production accompanied by cough, cleaning care of the air incision, fatigue, and sleep disturbances. Some patients do not actively exclude secretions due to pain, and the formation of sputum plugs causes lung inflammation, which is not conducive to postoperative recovery. Good postoperative pain management is beneficial to shorten the length of hospital stay and reduce mortality. Sufentanil is most commonly used for postoperative analgesia and has good analgesic effect, but there are some adverse effects, such as dizziness, nausea and vomiting, urinary retention, skin itching, respiratory depression, etc. As a new type of analgesic, dezocine has been widely used in clinical practice with few adverse reactions to the respiratory and circulatory system, and its application to postoperative analgesia can significantly improve the immune activity. At present, there are not many studies on continuous analgesia of dezocine, mostly single-dose analgesia studies, this study for different doses of dezocine for the postoperative analgesic effect of laryngeal cancer patients, compared with the current classic opioid analgesics, to provide a new scheme for clinical medication.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
February 10, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 14, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 30, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 4, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 21, 2023
CompletedAugust 21, 2023
August 1, 2023
11 months
May 4, 2023
August 12, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
total
no pain =0, mild pain =1-3, moderate pain =4-6, and severe pain =7-10
from the end of the surgery to 48 hours after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (11)
24 hours amount of drug
From the time of use postoperative analgesic to the time of 24 hours after the surgery
48 hours pressing times of Patient-controlled Analgesia
From the time of use postoperative analgesic to the time of 48 hours after the surgery
Visual Analogue Scale
at the time of 6 hours after the surgery
Visual Analogue Scale
at the time of 12 hours after the surgery
Visual Analogue Scale
at the time of 24 hours after the surgery
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
group S
EXPERIMENTALsufentanil 2μg/kg + flurbiprofen 250mg+granisetron 6mg
group D1
ACTIVE COMPARATORdezocine 0.5mg/kg + flurbiprofen 250mg+granisetron 6mg
group D2
ACTIVE COMPARATORdezocine 0.6mg/kg + flurbiprofen 250mg+granisetron 6mg
Interventions
granisetron has antiemetic function.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who underwent elective partial laryngectomy
- American society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification :Ⅰ\~Ⅱ
You may not qualify if:
- chronic pain
- long-term use of analgesics
- allergy to perioperative medications
- previous postoperative nausea and vomiting
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Fudan University
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200031, China
Related Publications (10)
Budliger H, Prader A, Morscher E, Fendel H. [Round table discussion on bone age]. Radiologe. 1971 Aug;11(8):296-9. No abstract available. German.
PMID: 4329172BACKGROUNDPerry F, Parker RK, White PF, Clifford PA. Role of psychological factors in postoperative pain control and recovery with patient-controlled analgesia. Clin J Pain. 1994 Mar;10(1):57-63; discussion 82-5. doi: 10.1097/00002508-199403000-00008.
PMID: 8193445BACKGROUNDO'Brien JJ, Benfield P. Dezocine. A preliminary review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy. Drugs. 1989 Aug;38(2):226-48. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198938020-00005.
PMID: 2670517BACKGROUNDWang YX, Mao XF, Li TF, Gong N, Zhang MZ. Dezocine exhibits antihypersensitivity activities in neuropathy through spinal mu-opioid receptor activation and norepinephrine reuptake inhibition. Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 23;7:43137. doi: 10.1038/srep43137.
PMID: 28230181BACKGROUNDGharagozlou P, Demirci H, Clark JD, Lameh J. Activation profiles of opioid ligands in HEK cells expressing delta opioid receptors. BMC Neurosci. 2002 Nov 18;3:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-3-19. Epub 2002 Nov 18.
PMID: 12437765BACKGROUNDLiu R, Huang XP, Yeliseev A, Xi J, Roth BL. Novel molecular targets of dezocine and their clinical implications. Anesthesiology. 2014 Mar;120(3):714-23. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000076.
PMID: 24263237BACKGROUNDBian X, Zhou R, Yang Y, Li P, Hang Y, Hu Y, Yang L, Wen D. Divergent Effect of Dezocine, Morphine and Sufentanil on Intestinal Motor Function in Rats. Int J Med Sci. 2015 Oct 15;12(11):848-52. doi: 10.7150/ijms.12616. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 26640403BACKGROUNDZhou X, Zhang C, Wang M, Yu L, Yan M. Dezocine for Preventing Postoperative Pain: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. PLoS One. 2015 Aug 19;10(8):e0136091. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136091. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 26287536BACKGROUNDWang C, Li L, Shen B, Jiang H, Yuan L, Shi D, Zhu J, Guo X, Li H. A multicenter randomized double-blind prospective study of the postoperative patient controlled intravenous analgesia effects of dezocine in elderly patients. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014 Mar 15;7(3):530-9. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 24753745BACKGROUNDZhou L, Zhang Y, Sun H, Hu R, Wang J, Xu G. Effect of preemptive dezocine before general anesthesia on postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective observational study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Sep;97(39):e12533. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012533.
PMID: 30278544BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Jie Li
Fudan University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 4, 2023
First Posted
August 21, 2023
Study Start
February 10, 2022
Primary Completion
January 14, 2023
Study Completion
January 30, 2023
Last Updated
August 21, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share