Investigation of the Relationship of Pain Perception and Pain Belief With Age in People With Chronic Lack Pain
1 other identifier
observational
210
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study was planned to investigate the relationship between pain perceptions and pain beliefs of individuals in different age groups with chronic low back pain and symptom severity.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Sep 2023
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 9, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 18, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 2, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 25, 2023
CompletedOctober 2, 2023
September 1, 2023
1 day
August 9, 2023
September 29, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
The numeric rating scale - NRS-11
When using the NRS-11, patients are asked to rate their pain on a scale of 0 to 10; where using integers (11 integers including zero) 0 represents "no pain" and 10 represents "worst possible pain". Based on prior studies and clinical experience of use, pain screening scores NRS-11 scores as mild (1-3) are classified as moderate (4-6) or severe (7-10).
2 weeks
The centrality of pain scale - COPS)
It is a short 10-item self-report scale designed to assess the centrality of pain. COPS scores are significantly correlated with the clinician's assessment of individual-reported pain severity, disability, mental health, quality of life, and how well the patient's pain is controlled. Each item is rated on a five-point Likert scale. It is a 10-item questionnaire (1: strongly disagree, 2: disagree, 3: neither agree nor disagree, 4: agree, 5: strongly agree). Items 2, 4 and 9 are evaluated in reverse. The resulting value is the sum of all item scores. Higher scores indicate more "central" pain. The highest possible score is 50 and the lowest possible score is 10.
2 weeks
The pain beliefs questionnaire - PBQ
Two subtests of the test were created: the 8-item Organic Beliefs subtest and the 4-item Psychological Beliefs subtest. The item numbers of both subtests are listed as follows: Organic Beliefs: items 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 10, 11, Psychological Beliefs: Items 4, 6, 9, 12. The test takers are asked to indicate the most appropriate one for the participants from 6 options ranging from 1st "never" to 6th "always". The marked scores range from 1 to 6 for each item. The score collected for each subtest is calculated by taking the items in that subtest and summing them up and dividing the numbers by the number of items related to that subtest. An increase in the value calculated from the sub-dimension of the scale indicates that the belief in pain belonging to the sub-dimension is high, and a decrease in the value indicates low pain belief in the sub-dimension.
2 weeks
Study Arms (3)
young group
Participants aged 18-39
middle-aged group
Participants aged 40-56
elderly group
Participants aged 57-79
Interventions
As a research, it was planned to be a quantitative research. Data collection will be conducted through online and face-to-face surveys. Scales and forms to be found and used in the research: The Pain Beliefs Questionnaire-PBQ, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11) and The Central Of Pain Scale-COPS. By handing out the paper format to the participants and uploading it to the Google Forms system online, it can be downloaded from mail, social media or mobile phone applications such as message, Mail, etc. They will be asked to participate in the study by accessing
As a research, it was planned to be a quantitative research. Data collection will be conducted through online and face-to-face surveys. Scales and forms to be found and used in the research: The Pain Beliefs Questionnaire-PBQ, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11) and The Central Of Pain Scale-COPS. By handing out the paper format to the participants and uploading it to the Google Forms system online, it can be downloaded from mail, social media or mobile phone applications such as message, Mail, etc. They will be asked to participate in the study by accessing
As a research, it was planned to be a quantitative research. Data collection will be conducted through online and face-to-face surveys. Scales and forms to be found and used in the research: The Pain Beliefs Questionnaire-PBQ, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS-11) and The Central Of Pain Scale-COPS. By handing out the paper format to the participants and uploading it to the Google Forms system online, it can be downloaded from mail, social media or mobile phone applications such as message, Mail, etc. They will be asked to participate in the study by accessing
Eligibility Criteria
The study will take place in Istanbul, Turkey. Volunteers who accepted the voluntary consent form will be included in the study.
You may qualify if:
- having low back pain for at least the past three months
- be between the ages of 18-79.
You may not qualify if:
- Those outside the age limit of 18-79 and illiteracy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Üsküdar Unıversıty
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (5)
La Touche R, Grande-Alonso M, Arnes-Prieto P, Paris-Alemany A. How Does Self-Efficacy Influence Pain Perception, Postural Stability and Range of Motion in Individuals with Chronic Low Back Pain? Pain Physician. 2019 Jan;22(1):E1-E13.
PMID: 30700075BACKGROUNDBaird AJ, Haslam RA. Exploring differences in pain beliefs within and between a large nonclinical (workplace) population and a clinical (chronic low back pain) population using the pain beliefs questionnaire. Phys Ther. 2013 Dec;93(12):1615-24. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120429. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
PMID: 23886843BACKGROUNDPulvers K, Hood A. The role of positive traits and pain catastrophizing in pain perception. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2013 May;17(5):330. doi: 10.1007/s11916-013-0330-2.
PMID: 23512722BACKGROUNDWalsh DA, Radcliffe JC. Pain beliefs and perceived physical disability of patients with chronic low back pain. Pain. 2002 May;97(1-2):23-31. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(01)00426-2.
PMID: 12031776BACKGROUNDWandner LD, Scipio CD, Hirsh AT, Torres CA, Robinson ME. The perception of pain in others: how gender, race, and age influence pain expectations. J Pain. 2012 Mar;13(3):220-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2011.10.014. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
PMID: 22225969BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Mahsun EKİNCİ
Uskudar University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- assistant professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 9, 2023
First Posted
August 18, 2023
Study Start
September 1, 2023
Primary Completion
September 2, 2023
Study Completion
September 25, 2023
Last Updated
October 2, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share