Diagnostic Efficacy of EUS-FNA/B Versus ERCP With or Without POCS-TB in Patients With Suspected Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma
Diagnostic Efficacy of Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration/Biopsy Versus Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography With or Without Peroral Cholangioscopy Targeted Biopsy for Suspected Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: an Open Multicenter Prospective Study
1 other identifier
observational
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This is an observational study with a prospective cohort design. This study enrolled patients with suspected hilar cholangiocarcinoma on imaging. This study aims to evaluate the histopathological diagnostic efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy (EUS-FNA/B) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with or without peroral cholangioscopy targeted biopsy (POCS-TB) in patients with suspected hilar cholangiocarcinoma. In addition, the incidence of complications was compared between the EUS-FNA/B and ERCP with or without POCS-TB. The impact of the histopathological diagnosis on survival outcomes in patients with suspected hilar cholangiocarcinoma was evaluated.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Aug 2023
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 13, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 14, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 15, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2025
CompletedJanuary 26, 2026
August 1, 2024
2.4 years
July 13, 2023
January 23, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The diagnostic value of EUS-FNA/B versus ERCP with or without POCS-TB in diagnosing hilar cholangiocarcinoma
The diagnostic value was assessed by sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values.
2023-08-14 to 2027-08-01
Secondary Outcomes (18)
The incidence of complications
2023-08-14 to 2027-08-01
The cost-effectiveness ratio
2023-08-14 to 2027-08-01
The emergency readmission time
2023-08-14 to 2027-08-01
The proportion of tissue deemed adequate for cytological or histological analysis obtained by EUS-FNA/B and ERCP with or without POCS-TB.
2023-08-14 to 2027-08-01
The number of participants whose visual diagnosis by the new generation of Eye Max cholangioscopy was consistent with the pathological and final diagnoses, respectively.
2023-08-14 to 2027-08-01
- +13 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
EUS-FNA/B group; ERCP with or without POCS-TB group
EUS-FNA/B group: Patients with suspected hilar cholangiocarcinoma who were considered suitable for obtaining histopathological diagnosis by EUS-FNA/B by experts
ERCP with or without POCS-TB group
ERCP with or without POCS-TB group: Patients with suspected hilar cholangiocarcinoma who were considered suitable for obtaining histopathological diagnosis by ERCP with or without POCS-TB by experts
Interventions
The appropriate sampling approach was selected as EUS-FNA/B or ERCP with or without POCS-TB based on experts' overall evaluation. This study will compare the histopathological diagnosis of the selected sampling method with the final diagnosis.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients with suspected hilar cholangiocarcinoma who were considered suitable for obtaining histopathological diagnosis by EUS-FNA/B or ERCP with or without POCS-TB by experts
You may qualify if:
- ≥ 18 years old;
- Newly diagnosed patients with suspected hilar cholangiocarcinoma on imaging examination
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with a definite diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma by imaging (enhanced CT, MRI, or MRCP) and surgical candidacy within 3 months;
- Patients scheduled for liver transplantation;
- Patients with previous gastroduodenal diversion or biliary surgery;
- Patients with hilar bile duct stenosis caused by tumor or lesion outside the bile duct;
- Pregnant or lactating women;
- Patients who cannot tolerate intravenous general anesthesia due to various reasons;
- Patients with severe coagulation dysfunction, or patients who cannot stop antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy for a short time and are unsuitable for low molecular weight heparin replacement therapy;
- Patients who refused to sign informed consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- LanZhou Universitycollaborator
- Beijing Friendship Hospitalcollaborator
- Binzhou Medical Universitycollaborator
- Shandong Provincial Hospitalcollaborator
- Shandong Province Third hospitalcollaborator
- Sir Run Run Shaw Hospitalcollaborator
- The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South Universitycollaborator
- Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technologycollaborator
- First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical Universitycollaborator
- Qilu Hospital of Shandong Universitylead
- First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
Jinan, Shandong, 250063, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ning Zhong, MD
Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 13, 2023
First Posted
August 15, 2023
Study Start
August 14, 2023
Primary Completion
December 31, 2025
Study Completion
December 31, 2025
Last Updated
January 26, 2026
Record last verified: 2024-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share