Leveraging Electronic Health Record Data in a Risk Prediction Model to Increase HIV PrEP Intake in Primary Care
Randomized Trial Leveraging Electronic Health Record Data in a Risk Prediction Model to Increase HIV PrEP Uptake in Primary Care.
1 other identifier
interventional
121
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) has been a national leader in implementation of HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP), a daily antiretroviral pill that is more than 99% effective in preventing HIV acquisition. However, many patients at risk for HIV at KPNC are not yet using PrEP, resulting in preventable infections each year. In prior work, the study team developed and validated a prediction model that used electronic health record (EHR) data from 3.7 million KPNC members to identify patients at high risk of HIV acquisition but not using PrEP. The model substantially outperformed models based only on CDC criteria for PrEP use, particularly for Black patients, a population with high HIV incidence and lower PrEP uptake. The objective of this proposal is to evaluate the feasibility of implementing this EHR-based model at the point of care to increase PrEP referrals and uptake at KPNC. The specific aims of this project are to 1) conduct provider focus groups to identify barriers and facilitators to PrEP referrals and to optimize the delivery mechanism of our clinical decision support intervention, 2) evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a clinical decision support intervention for primary care providers (PCPs) to increase PrEP referrals and uptake among high-risk patients, and 3) assess patient- and provider-based characteristics associated with PrEP referrals and uptake. To accomplish these aims, the study team proposes a randomized controlled trial of a clinical decision support intervention for PrEP, which involves alerting KP San Francisco (KPSF) Adult and Family Medicine PCPs about patients identified by our prediction model as being at high risk for HIV acquisition prior to in-person clinic visits. We will compare PrEP referrals and uptake among patients who are seen by PCPs randomized to intervention and usual care study arms using an intention-to-treat analysis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2021
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 31, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 4, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 15, 2023
CompletedAugust 15, 2023
August 1, 2023
6 months
August 4, 2023
August 11, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Cumulative risk (%) of linkage to PrEP
linkage to PrEP care within 90 days of the first encounter, defined as first of following: PrEP discussion (ICD-10 Z29.8), referral (measured by PrEP referrals and appointments booked through e-consult, a provider-to-provider community platform embedded in the EHR ), or prescription fill for emtricitabine coformulated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or with tenofovir alafenamide
Within 90 days after PrEP referral.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Cumulative risk (%) of PrEP Prescription fill only
Within 90 days after first encounter
Cumulative risk (%) of HIV Testing
within 90 days of first encounter
Cumulative risk (%) of STI Testing
within 90 days of first encounter
Study Arms (2)
Intervention
EXPERIMENTALUsual Care
NO INTERVENTIONInterventions
PCPs notified by EHR messages if they had an upcoming in-person or video visit with an eligible patient who had a predicted risk of incident HIV diagnosis of 0.2% or higher. Study team members manually sent messages marked as "high priority" one business day prior to scheduled visits, alerting PCPs that a patient may be at increased risk for acquiring HIV and may benefit from a conversation about PrEP. Additional information was provided about the study, the prediction model, clinical indications for PrEP, strategies for initiating discussions about HIV prevention and PrEP, and how to refer patients to KPSF's PrEP program. Messages did not include the numeric predicted HIV risk from the model. PCPs received a maximum of two messages per day; with the two patients with the highest predicted risk were selected. Patient with multiple visits were flagged no more than once monthly.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Primary care provider at Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Medical Center
- Provide primary care to adult patients
- more than 150 people without HIV on their primary care physician panel.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Kaiser Permanente Northern California Division of Research
Oakland, California, 94612, United States
Related Publications (1)
Volk JE, Leyden WA, Lea AN, Lee C, Donnelly MC, Krakower DS, Lee K, Liu VX, Marcus JL, Silverberg MJ. Using Electronic Health Records to Improve HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Care: A Randomized Trial. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2024 Apr 1;95(4):362-369. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000003376.
PMID: 38412047DERIVED
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 4, 2023
First Posted
August 15, 2023
Study Start
June 1, 2021
Primary Completion
November 30, 2021
Study Completion
October 31, 2022
Last Updated
August 15, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
There is no plan to make individual participant data available to other researchers.