Effect of End-inspiratory Airway Pressure Measurements on the Risk of VILI in Ventilated Patients
P1P2Decay
Effect of Different Measurements of End-inspiratory Airway Pressure on Driving Pressure and Mechanical Power in Mechanically Ventilated Patients: the P1-P2 Decay Study
1 other identifier
observational
1,000
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Mechanical ventilation may be associated with ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). Several respiratory variables have been employed to estimate the risk of VILI, such as tidal volumes, plateau pressure, driving pressure, and mechanical power. This dissipation of energy during ventilation can contribute to VILI through two mechanisms, stress relaxation and pendelluft, which can be estimated at the bedside by applying an end-inspiratory pause and evaluating the slow decrease in airway pressure going from the pressure corresponding to zero flow (called pressure P1) and the final pressure at the end of the pause (called plateau pressure P2). The choice of measuring the end-inspiratory airway pressure (PawEND-INSP) at a fixed, although relatively early, timepoint, i.e., after 0.5 second from the beginning of the pause, as prescribed by the indications of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Network, while assessing the risk of VILI associated with the elastic pressure of the respiratory system, may not reflect the harmful potential associated with the viscoelastic properties of the respiratory system. It is still unclear whether an PawEND-INSP measured at the exact moment of zero flow (P1) is more reliable in the calculation of those variables, such as ΔP and MP, associated with the outcomes of patients with and without ARDS, as compared to the pressure measured at the end of the end-inspiratory pause (plateau pressure P2). This multicenter prospective observational study aims to evaluate whether the use of P1, as compared to P2, affects the calculation of ΔP and MP. The secondary objectives are: 1) verify whether in patients with a lung parenchyma characterized by greater parenchymal heterogeneity, as assessed by EIT, P1-P2 decay is greater than in patients with greater parenchymal homogeneity; 2) evaluate whether patients with both ΔP values calculated using P1 and P2 \<15 cmH2O (or both MP values calculated using P1 and P2 \<17 J/min) develop shorter duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, shorter ICU and hospital length of stay and lower ICU and hospital mortality, as compared to patients with only ΔP calculated with P1 ≥ 15 cmH2O (or only MP calculated with P1 ≥ 17 J/min) and patients with both ΔP values calculated using P1 and P2 ≥ 15 cmH2O (or both MP values calculated using P1 and P2 ≥ 17 J/min).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Mar 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 9, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 14, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2024
CompletedAugust 14, 2023
August 1, 2023
1.8 years
July 1, 2023
August 10, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Comparison among ΔP values calculated with end-inspiratory airway pressure measured at different timepoints during a 5-s-end-inspiratory pause: automatic pause of the ventilator, first point of zero flow (P1), 0.5 s, 2 s, 3 s, and 5 s (P2)
Calculation of ΔP with end-inspiratory airway pressure measured at different timepoints (automatic pause of the ventilator, first point of zero flow \[P1\], 0.5 s, 2 s, 3 s, 5 s \[P2\]) and comparison of the different values
Once per patient within 48 h from ICU admission
Comparison among MP values calculated with end-inspiratory airway pressure measured at different timepoints during a 5-s-end-inspiratory pause: automatic pause of the ventilator, first point of zero flow (P1), 0.5 s, 2 s, 3 s, and 5 s (P2)
Calculation of MP with end-inspiratory airway pressure measured at different timepoints (automatic pause of the ventilator, first point of zero flow \[P1\], 0.5 s, 2 s, 3 s, 5 s \[P2\]) and comparison of the different values
Within 2 days from ICU admission
Secondary Outcomes (12)
Comparison among end-inspiratory airway pressures measured at different timepoints: automatic pause of the ventilator, first point of zero flow (P1), 0.5 s, 2 s, 3 s, and 5 s (P2)
Within 2 days from ICU admission
Comparison among respiratory system compliance calculated with end-inspiratory airway pressure measured at different timepoints: automatic pause of the ventilator, first point of zero flow (P1), 0.5 s, 2 s, 3 s, and 5 s (P2)
Within 2 days from ICU admission
Comparison among airway resistance calculated with end-inspiratory airway pressure measured at different timepoints: automatic pause of the ventilator, first point of zero flow (P1), 0.5 s, 2 s, 3 s, and 5 s (P2)
Within 2 days from ICU admission
Correlation between EIT variables indicating lung parenchymal heterogeneity and the difference between the values of P1 and P2 and the values of ΔP (or MP) calculated with P1 and P2
Within 2 days from ICU admission
Association between ΔP calculated with P1 and P2 and duration of invasive mechanical ventilation
From date of randomization until the date of ICU discharge/death assessed up to 12 months
- +7 more secondary outcomes
Eligibility Criteria
Adult patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation with volume-controlled ventilation
You may qualify if:
- Age greater than 18 years old
- Endotracheal intubation or tracheostomy
- Controlled mechanical ventilation
- Patient able to tolerate a 5-second end-inspiratory and end-expiratory pause with no hemodynamic or respiratory complications and pressure-time waveforms of sufficient quality for interpretation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University Hospital of Padua
Padua, 35128, Italy
Related Publications (11)
Slutsky AS, Ranieri VM. Ventilator-induced lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2013 Nov 28;369(22):2126-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1208707. No abstract available.
PMID: 24283226BACKGROUNDAcute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network; Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT, Wheeler A. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 4;342(18):1301-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005043421801.
PMID: 10793162BACKGROUNDFan E, Del Sorbo L, Goligher EC, Hodgson CL, Munshi L, Walkey AJ, Adhikari NKJ, Amato MBP, Branson R, Brower RG, Ferguson ND, Gajic O, Gattinoni L, Hess D, Mancebo J, Meade MO, McAuley DF, Pesenti A, Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Rubin E, Seckel M, Slutsky AS, Talmor D, Thompson BT, Wunsch H, Uleryk E, Brozek J, Brochard LJ; American Thoracic Society, European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, and Society of Critical Care Medicine. An Official American Thoracic Society/European Society of Intensive Care Medicine/Society of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline: Mechanical Ventilation in Adult Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 May 1;195(9):1253-1263. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201703-0548ST.
PMID: 28459336BACKGROUNDAmato MB, Meade MO, Slutsky AS, Brochard L, Costa EL, Schoenfeld DA, Stewart TE, Briel M, Talmor D, Mercat A, Richard JC, Carvalho CR, Brower RG. Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 19;372(8):747-55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1410639.
PMID: 25693014BACKGROUNDGattinoni L, Tonetti T, Cressoni M, Cadringher P, Herrmann P, Moerer O, Protti A, Gotti M, Chiurazzi C, Carlesso E, Chiumello D, Quintel M. Ventilator-related causes of lung injury: the mechanical power. Intensive Care Med. 2016 Oct;42(10):1567-1575. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4505-2. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
PMID: 27620287BACKGROUNDProtti A, Votta E. Role of tissue viscoelasticity in the pathogenesis of ventilator-induced lung injury. In: Vincent JL, ed. Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2018. Springer International Publishing; 2018:193-204.
BACKGROUNDChi Y, Zhao Z, Frerichs I, Long Y, He H. Prevalence and prognosis of respiratory pendelluft phenomenon in mechanically ventilated ICU patients with acute respiratory failure: a retrospective cohort study. Ann Intensive Care. 2022 Mar 5;12(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13613-022-00995-w.
PMID: 35246748BACKGROUNDBarberis L, Manno E, Guerin C. Effect of end-inspiratory pause duration on plateau pressure in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med. 2003 Jan;29(1):130-4. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1568-z. Epub 2002 Dec 6.
PMID: 12528034BACKGROUNDMezidi M, Yonis H, Aublanc M, Lissonde F, Louf-Durier A, Perinel S, Tapponnier R, Richard JC, Guerin C. Effect of end-inspiratory plateau pressure duration on driving pressure. Intensive Care Med. 2017 Apr;43(4):587-589. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4651-6. Epub 2016 Dec 20. No abstract available.
PMID: 27999900BACKGROUNDSantini A, Votta E, Protti A, Mezidi M, Guerin C. Driving airway pressure: should we use a static measure to describe a dynamic phenomenon? Intensive Care Med. 2017 Oct;43(10):1544-1545. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4850-9. Epub 2017 Jun 1. No abstract available.
PMID: 28573391BACKGROUNDMaltais F, Reissmann H, Navalesi P, Hernandez P, Gursahaney A, Ranieri VM, Sovilj M, Gottfried SB. Comparison of static and dynamic measurements of intrinsic PEEP in mechanically ventilated patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994 Nov;150(5 Pt 1):1318-24. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.150.5.7952559.
PMID: 7952559BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tommaso Pettenuzzo, MD
Institute of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Padua University Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 1, 2023
First Posted
August 14, 2023
Study Start
March 9, 2023
Primary Completion
December 31, 2024
Study Completion
December 31, 2024
Last Updated
August 14, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share