NCT05991258

Brief Summary

Mechanical ventilation may be associated with ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). Several respiratory variables have been employed to estimate the risk of VILI, such as tidal volumes, plateau pressure, driving pressure, and mechanical power. This dissipation of energy during ventilation can contribute to VILI through two mechanisms, stress relaxation and pendelluft, which can be estimated at the bedside by applying an end-inspiratory pause and evaluating the slow decrease in airway pressure going from the pressure corresponding to zero flow (called pressure P1) and the final pressure at the end of the pause (called plateau pressure P2). The choice of measuring the end-inspiratory airway pressure (PawEND-INSP) at a fixed, although relatively early, timepoint, i.e., after 0.5 second from the beginning of the pause, as prescribed by the indications of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Network, while assessing the risk of VILI associated with the elastic pressure of the respiratory system, may not reflect the harmful potential associated with the viscoelastic properties of the respiratory system. It is still unclear whether an PawEND-INSP measured at the exact moment of zero flow (P1) is more reliable in the calculation of those variables, such as ΔP and MP, associated with the outcomes of patients with and without ARDS, as compared to the pressure measured at the end of the end-inspiratory pause (plateau pressure P2). This multicenter prospective observational study aims to evaluate whether the use of P1, as compared to P2, affects the calculation of ΔP and MP. The secondary objectives are: 1) verify whether in patients with a lung parenchyma characterized by greater parenchymal heterogeneity, as assessed by EIT, P1-P2 decay is greater than in patients with greater parenchymal homogeneity; 2) evaluate whether patients with both ΔP values calculated using P1 and P2 \<15 cmH2O (or both MP values calculated using P1 and P2 \<17 J/min) develop shorter duration of invasive mechanical ventilation, shorter ICU and hospital length of stay and lower ICU and hospital mortality, as compared to patients with only ΔP calculated with P1 ≥ 15 cmH2O (or only MP calculated with P1 ≥ 17 J/min) and patients with both ΔP values calculated using P1 and P2 ≥ 15 cmH2O (or both MP values calculated using P1 and P2 ≥ 17 J/min).

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
1,000

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 9, 2023

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 1, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 14, 2023

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

August 14, 2023

Status Verified

August 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

July 1, 2023

Last Update Submit

August 10, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

acute respiratory failureventilator-induced lung injury

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Comparison among ΔP values calculated with end-inspiratory airway pressure measured at different timepoints during a 5-s-end-inspiratory pause: automatic pause of the ventilator, first point of zero flow (P1), 0.5 s, 2 s, 3 s, and 5 s (P2)

    Calculation of ΔP with end-inspiratory airway pressure measured at different timepoints (automatic pause of the ventilator, first point of zero flow \[P1\], 0.5 s, 2 s, 3 s, 5 s \[P2\]) and comparison of the different values

    Once per patient within 48 h from ICU admission

  • Comparison among MP values calculated with end-inspiratory airway pressure measured at different timepoints during a 5-s-end-inspiratory pause: automatic pause of the ventilator, first point of zero flow (P1), 0.5 s, 2 s, 3 s, and 5 s (P2)

    Calculation of MP with end-inspiratory airway pressure measured at different timepoints (automatic pause of the ventilator, first point of zero flow \[P1\], 0.5 s, 2 s, 3 s, 5 s \[P2\]) and comparison of the different values

    Within 2 days from ICU admission

Secondary Outcomes (12)

  • Comparison among end-inspiratory airway pressures measured at different timepoints: automatic pause of the ventilator, first point of zero flow (P1), 0.5 s, 2 s, 3 s, and 5 s (P2)

    Within 2 days from ICU admission

  • Comparison among respiratory system compliance calculated with end-inspiratory airway pressure measured at different timepoints: automatic pause of the ventilator, first point of zero flow (P1), 0.5 s, 2 s, 3 s, and 5 s (P2)

    Within 2 days from ICU admission

  • Comparison among airway resistance calculated with end-inspiratory airway pressure measured at different timepoints: automatic pause of the ventilator, first point of zero flow (P1), 0.5 s, 2 s, 3 s, and 5 s (P2)

    Within 2 days from ICU admission

  • Correlation between EIT variables indicating lung parenchymal heterogeneity and the difference between the values of P1 and P2 and the values of ΔP (or MP) calculated with P1 and P2

    Within 2 days from ICU admission

  • Association between ΔP calculated with P1 and P2 and duration of invasive mechanical ventilation

    From date of randomization until the date of ICU discharge/death assessed up to 12 months

  • +7 more secondary outcomes

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Adult patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation with volume-controlled ventilation

You may qualify if:

  • Age greater than 18 years old
  • Endotracheal intubation or tracheostomy
  • Controlled mechanical ventilation
  • Patient able to tolerate a 5-second end-inspiratory and end-expiratory pause with no hemodynamic or respiratory complications and pressure-time waveforms of sufficient quality for interpretation

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Hospital of Padua

Padua, 35128, Italy

RECRUITING

Related Publications (11)

  • Slutsky AS, Ranieri VM. Ventilator-induced lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2013 Nov 28;369(22):2126-36. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1208707. No abstract available.

    PMID: 24283226BACKGROUND
  • Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network; Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT, Wheeler A. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 4;342(18):1301-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005043421801.

    PMID: 10793162BACKGROUND
  • Fan E, Del Sorbo L, Goligher EC, Hodgson CL, Munshi L, Walkey AJ, Adhikari NKJ, Amato MBP, Branson R, Brower RG, Ferguson ND, Gajic O, Gattinoni L, Hess D, Mancebo J, Meade MO, McAuley DF, Pesenti A, Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Rubin E, Seckel M, Slutsky AS, Talmor D, Thompson BT, Wunsch H, Uleryk E, Brozek J, Brochard LJ; American Thoracic Society, European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, and Society of Critical Care Medicine. An Official American Thoracic Society/European Society of Intensive Care Medicine/Society of Critical Care Medicine Clinical Practice Guideline: Mechanical Ventilation in Adult Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 May 1;195(9):1253-1263. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201703-0548ST.

    PMID: 28459336BACKGROUND
  • Amato MB, Meade MO, Slutsky AS, Brochard L, Costa EL, Schoenfeld DA, Stewart TE, Briel M, Talmor D, Mercat A, Richard JC, Carvalho CR, Brower RG. Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 19;372(8):747-55. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1410639.

    PMID: 25693014BACKGROUND
  • Gattinoni L, Tonetti T, Cressoni M, Cadringher P, Herrmann P, Moerer O, Protti A, Gotti M, Chiurazzi C, Carlesso E, Chiumello D, Quintel M. Ventilator-related causes of lung injury: the mechanical power. Intensive Care Med. 2016 Oct;42(10):1567-1575. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4505-2. Epub 2016 Sep 12.

    PMID: 27620287BACKGROUND
  • Protti A, Votta E. Role of tissue viscoelasticity in the pathogenesis of ventilator-induced lung injury. In: Vincent JL, ed. Annual Update in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine 2018. Springer International Publishing; 2018:193-204.

    BACKGROUND
  • Chi Y, Zhao Z, Frerichs I, Long Y, He H. Prevalence and prognosis of respiratory pendelluft phenomenon in mechanically ventilated ICU patients with acute respiratory failure: a retrospective cohort study. Ann Intensive Care. 2022 Mar 5;12(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s13613-022-00995-w.

    PMID: 35246748BACKGROUND
  • Barberis L, Manno E, Guerin C. Effect of end-inspiratory pause duration on plateau pressure in mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med. 2003 Jan;29(1):130-4. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1568-z. Epub 2002 Dec 6.

    PMID: 12528034BACKGROUND
  • Mezidi M, Yonis H, Aublanc M, Lissonde F, Louf-Durier A, Perinel S, Tapponnier R, Richard JC, Guerin C. Effect of end-inspiratory plateau pressure duration on driving pressure. Intensive Care Med. 2017 Apr;43(4):587-589. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4651-6. Epub 2016 Dec 20. No abstract available.

    PMID: 27999900BACKGROUND
  • Santini A, Votta E, Protti A, Mezidi M, Guerin C. Driving airway pressure: should we use a static measure to describe a dynamic phenomenon? Intensive Care Med. 2017 Oct;43(10):1544-1545. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4850-9. Epub 2017 Jun 1. No abstract available.

    PMID: 28573391BACKGROUND
  • Maltais F, Reissmann H, Navalesi P, Hernandez P, Gursahaney A, Ranieri VM, Sovilj M, Gottfried SB. Comparison of static and dynamic measurements of intrinsic PEEP in mechanically ventilated patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994 Nov;150(5 Pt 1):1318-24. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.150.5.7952559.

    PMID: 7952559BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Lung InjuryLung DiseasesRespiratory Tract Diseases

Study Officials

  • Tommaso Pettenuzzo, MD

    Institute of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Padua University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 1, 2023

First Posted

August 14, 2023

Study Start

March 9, 2023

Primary Completion

December 31, 2024

Study Completion

December 31, 2024

Last Updated

August 14, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations