Role of Doppler Endoscopic Probe in the Diagnosis of Subepithelial Gastrointestinal Lesions.
DopplerSEL
2 other identifiers
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
RESEARCH PLAN I-TITLE Role of Doppler endoscopic probe in the diagnosis of subepithelial gastrointestinal lesions. II-BACKGROUND Subepithelial lesions (SEL) are commonly encountered during routine endoscopies with an estimated prevalence of 3.5%. Most of the SELs are detected during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Subsequently, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) is performed to better characterize the lesion and to rule out the presence of a vascular lesion before tissue sampling due to the high risk of severe bleeding with tissue acquisition in vascular injury. However, EUS can rarely establish a definitive diagnosis per se with limited accuracy. In large lesions, it is possible to use cytology or histology needles via the EUS instrument to collect cells/tissue within the lesion. It can lead to accurate diagnosis and consistent management. However, EUS-guided tissue sampling can be technically challenging, with poor yield for small or mobile SELs. In addition, EUS is an expensive technique, high operator dependency and performed only in tertiary centers. It creates a time gap between endoscopic detection and the EUS examination and increases costs. That delay in diagnosis is a source of anxiety for the patient and for the caregivers. Several methods were proposed to increase the diagnostic yield of tissue acquisition techniques, such as "bite-on-bite" biopsies which showed a limited diagnostic yield. Alternatively, the "unroofing" technique has also been advocated for histological diagnosis. In unroofing, a loop is used to remove the normal epithelium covering the subepithelial lesions and after epithelial removal, a biopsy forceps or loop is used to sample subepithelial lesions. Other techniques include endoscopic resection by snare or submucosal dissection. These enable a surgical specimen but are technically demanding and have been complicated by perforation and bleeding in most series. There is a need for a method that enables rapid diagnosis in the same session as endoscopic detection of SEL regardless of their size. That method should ideally enable histological diagnosis with low risks of complications and should not require high technical expertise and should not be highly dependent on the operator. The ideal solution to address the diagnosis of gastrointestinal (GI) SEL would be one that would provide a tissue sampling after exclusion of a highly vascular lesion, in the same session as endoscopic detection. Doppler endoscopic probe (DEP) is a Doppler endoscopic probe specially developed for the GI system, which enables blood flow detection during endoscopy. DEP is CE and FDA approved and can be used through the working channel of the endoscope. Unlike standard EUS, which requires advanced endoscopic training, DEP is much easier to use. It allows the characterization of lesions as non-vascular, venous or arterial. Recent studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of DEP in vascular characterization in the gastrointestinal tract. III PURPOSE Primary objective:
- Proof of concept evaluation of the role of DEP in the characterization of GI SEL as non-vascular or vascular (arterial or venous)
- Relationship between findings on DEP versus findings on EUS (considered the gold standard) regarding SEL characterization as non-vascular or vascular (arterial or venous). Secondary purposes:
- Accuracy in removing the histological characterization of subepithelial GI lesions.
- Complications in connection with tissue acquisition
- Inter-observer agreement of DEP and EUS results. IV METHODS This is a pilot projective feasibility study that will be run by Karolinska University Hospital in Stockholm Patients with subepithelial GI lesions were referred for EUS evaluation. The study will include 30 patients. A conventional gastroscopy will be performed. After identification of the lesion, DEP is performed. The DEP probe is lubricated and deployed through the working channel of the endoscope. The probe will contact the mucosa slightly, covering the SEL. Then evaluate the lesion in 2 different angels. The results will be characterized and recorded qualitatively: no flow / arterial flow / venous flow and in terms of intensity: soft, medium or high. After DEP, evaluation EUS will be performed by another endoscopist who will be tied to the DEP results. EUS will be considered the gold standard. After both assessments, the lesion is characterized as no vessel / arterial / venous and as soft / medium / high flow intensity. EUS will be followed by removal of SEL in patients where EUS excludes the presence of high vessel disease. "Unroofing" will be performed using a conventional endoscopic loop, through the working channel of the endoscope. After the surface of the lesion is disturbed, a biopsy forceps will be used for tissue acquisition. Tissue will be stored in formalin and processed and evaluated by the pathologist.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 9, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2023
CompletedAugust 9, 2023
August 1, 2023
5 months
August 1, 2023
August 1, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
DEP accuracy
DEP. The auditory sound from arterial flow corresponds to a sound like a blood pressure "swish-swish," whereas venous flow is a low-pitched venous hum. Intensity will be recorded as soft, medium, or loud. Doppler on EUS will be evaluated as standard using the color-doppler and also wave flow assessment.
From enrollment to the end of study at 8 weeks
Study Arms (1)
Intervention
EXPERIMENTALDoppler endoscopic probe in the diagnosis of subepithelial gastrointestinal lesions
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Presence of subepithelial lesion on the GI tract.
You may not qualify if:
- Anticoagulation therapy that cannot be discontinued
- Liver cirrhosis with coagulopathy or varices
- Malignancy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Karolinska University Hospital & Karolinska Institute
Stockholm, 11346, Sweden
Related Publications (4)
Hunt GC, Smith PP, Faigel DO. Yield of tissue sampling for submucosal lesions evaluated by EUS. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Jan;57(1):68-72. doi: 10.1067/mge.2003.34.
PMID: 12518134BACKGROUNDPhilipper M, Hollerbach S, Gabbert HE, Heikaus S, Bocking A, Pomjanski N, Neuhaus H, Frieling T, Schumacher B. Prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and surgical histology in upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors. Endoscopy. 2010 Apr;42(4):300-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1244006. Epub 2010 Mar 19.
PMID: 20306384BACKGROUNDRosch T, Kapfer B, Will U, Baronius W, Strobel M, Lorenz R, Ulm K; German EUS Club. Endoscopic ultrasonography. Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography in upper gastrointestinal submucosal lesions: a prospective multicenter study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002 Jul;37(7):856-62.
PMID: 12190103BACKGROUNDBinmoeller KF, Shah JN, Bhat YM, Kane SD. Suck-ligate-unroof-biopsy by using a detachable 20-mm loop for the diagnosis and therapy of small subepithelial tumors (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 May;79(5):750-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.09.028. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
PMID: 24238309BACKGROUND
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD PhD, Senior consultant
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 1, 2023
First Posted
August 9, 2023
Study Start
August 1, 2023
Primary Completion
December 31, 2023
Study Completion
December 31, 2023
Last Updated
August 9, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share