An Analysis of Dermabond vs. Non-Absorbable Sutures in Skin Closure for Brow Ptosis Procedures
Scar Analysis in Direct Excision Brow Lift: Comparing Octyl-2- Cyanoacrylate (Dermabond) Versus Non-absorbable Sutures
1 other identifier
interventional
8
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to compare Dermabond with non-absorbable sutures in skin closure after brow ptosis surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- if Dermabond provides equivalent wound healing compared to conventional non-absorbable skin suture techniques
- if Dermabond provides equivalent scar appearance compared to conventional non-absorbable suture techniques
- if Dermabond results in equivalent complication rates compared to conventional non-absorbable suture techniques Participants will have be randomly selected to have either Dermabond or non-absorbable suture closure methods. Scar analysis and both participant and provider surveys will be performed to assess the differences between groups, if any.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 31, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 8, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 15, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 17, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 17, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 24, 2025
CompletedApril 24, 2025
April 1, 2025
8 months
July 31, 2023
March 31, 2025
April 21, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Scar Appearance
Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale filled out by both patient and provider at both postoperative visits of both Dermabond and non-absorbable sutures. This survey is scaled from 0-10, with 0 being normal skin and 10 being very different skin. Lower scores are desired on this survey.
10 days
Scar Appearance
Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale filled out by both patient and provider at both postoperative visits of both Dermabond and non-absorbable sutures. This survey is scaled from 0-10, with 0 being normal skin and 10 being very different skin. Lower scores are desired on this survey.
6 weeks
Number of Participants With Complications
Complications of both Dermabond and non-absorbable sutures to include dehiscence and infection
6 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Active Comparator: Dermabond
EXPERIMENTALThe surgical wound over one eyebrow will be closed with Dermabond.
Active Comparator: Non-Absorbable Sutures
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe surgical wound over one eyebrow will be closed with non-absorbable sutures.
Interventions
Use of Dermabond to close surgical incisions instead of non-absorbable sutures
Use of conventional non-absorbable sutures to close surgical incisions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients undergoing bilateral direct excision brow lift for brow ptosis at the University of Kentucky Medical Center.
- Patients \> 18 years of age.
- Patients must be able to follow up at the specified intervals.
- Patients who are able to give their own informed consent.
- Health Status: Variable health status reflective of general population of Kentucky. Patients will be healthy enough to be seen in an office setting.
- All patients will need to be proficient in the English language to understand the scale used for scar assessment
You may not qualify if:
- Patients \<18 years of age or \>100
- Allergy to Dermabond
- Adults with impaired consent capacity
- Incarcerated individuals
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cody Blanchardlead
Study Sites (1)
University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, 40508, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Cody Blanchard
- Organization
- University of Kentucky
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Peter Timoney, MD
University of Kentucky
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Resident Physician, Ophthalmology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 31, 2023
First Posted
August 8, 2023
Study Start
August 15, 2023
Primary Completion
April 17, 2024
Study Completion
April 17, 2024
Last Updated
April 24, 2025
Results First Posted
April 24, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04