Effects of App-assisted Home Exercise Program in Patients With Frozen Shoulder
Mobile Device Based Telerehabilitation for Frozen Shoulder-A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.
1 other identifier
interventional
21
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Abstract Introduction Frozen shoulder is a common musculoskeletal disorder with reported lifetime prevalence to be 2%\~5% in the general population. Patients with frozen shoulders present with chronic pain and limited range of motion of affected shoulder and often cause an adverse impact on their daily activities and working ability. Shoulder exercises had been proven to be effective in treatment of frozen shoulders and the effects were even better after intraarticular corticosteroid injection. Strategies to enhance home exercise for patients with frozen shoulders are essential. Objective To compare the effects of home exercises delivered by a newly developed app named Defrozen app with that by convention home exercise for frozen shoulder patients after intra-articular corticosteroid injection. Methods and analysis This is a randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded clinical trial. Seventy-eight individuals diagnosed with frozen shoulders will be randomly divided into two groups. The primary outcome will be shoulder passive range of motion (measured with a universal goniometer). The secondary outcomes will include , shoulder pain evaluated by 11-point numeric rating scale , Oxford shoulder score and Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire. Feasibility of the app includes including Technology Acceptance Model (TAM-2), System Usability Scale (SUS) and Usability, Satisfaction and Ease of Use (USE) questionnaire . The treatment will be conducted for 6 months (Defrozen app home exercise x conventional home exercise by instructions from printed pamphlets).All participants will receive outcome measurements assessment prior to randomization , 4 weeks , 12 weeks after injections interventions. Feasibility will be evaluated 4 weeks after intervention in the Defrozen app group. Ethics and dissemination The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board. The findings of the trial will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and scientific conferences.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 11, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 21, 2022
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 8, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 20, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2023
CompletedApril 3, 2025
August 1, 2022
1.1 years
November 21, 2022
March 31, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change shoulder active range of motion in degree
The range of motion of the shoulder will be assessed using a universal goniometer, which measures the angle of movement between specific bone landmarks. The investigator will evaluate the active range of motion of the affected shoulder, including flexion, abduction, internal rotation, and external rotation, using the goniometer to determine the degrees of movement in each direction. Active range of movement of the affected shoulder, including flexion, abduction, internal rotation, and external rotation, will be measured by goniometer in degree.
prior to randomization, 4-weeks after interventions and 12-weeks after intervention
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Change of Shoulder pain by Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)
prior to randomization, 4-weeks after interventions and 12-weeks after intervention
Change of Oxford shoulder score (OSS).
prior to randomization, 4-weeks after interventions and 12-weeks after intervention
Change of Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Head (QuickDASH) score
prior to randomization, 4-weeks after interventions and 12-weeks after intervention
Selected part of revised Technology Acceptance Model (TAM-2)
4 weeks after intervention in App intervention group
System Usability Scale (SUS)
4 weeks after intervention in App intervention group
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
App intervention group
EXPERIMENTALPatients will receive instructions on performing the seven sets of frozen shoulder exercises mentioned earlier. The APP intervention group will be guided through the exercises using the mobile app. Each set of exercises will involve 10 repetitions, and it is recommended to perform four sessions per day.
Conventional group
ACTIVE COMPARATORpatients will receive instructions on performing the seven sets of frozen shoulder exercises mentioned earlier. The conventional group will be provided with a printed pamphlet illustrating the exercises. Each set of exercises will involve 10 repetitions, and it is recommended to perform four sessions per day.
Interventions
All patients will receive both glenohumeral joint and subacromial space injections. The injections will consist of a solution containing 1 ml of 40 mg/ml triamcinolone acetonide and 1 ml of 1% lidocaine in each site. The glenohumeral joint injection will be performed blindly using an anterior approach. The needle will be inserted medially to the head of the humerus, located approximately 1 cm lateral to the coracoid process, and directed posteriorly at a slight superior and lateral angle. Patients will be educated on how to perform the 7 sets of frozen shoulder exercise. Subjects will be advised to perform all the exercises to a point that they may feel tightness but not painful and hold to the point for 2-3 seconds.
Patients will be educated on how to perform the 7 sets of frozen shoulder exercise. Subjects will be advised to perform all the exercises to a point that they may feel tightness but not painful and hold to the point for 2-3 seconds. Then the APP group will suggest performing the exercise from APP education The APP intervention group will be guided through the exercises using the mobile app, while the conventional group will be provided with a printed pamphlet illustrating the exercises.. Each set exercise will have 10 repetitions and investigators recommend 4 sessions per day.
All patients will be prescribed two weeks of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (aceclofenac) .
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Taoyuan District, Taiwan
Related Publications (37)
Mezian K, Coffey R, Chang KV. Frozen Shoulder(Archived). 2023 Aug 28. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482162/
PMID: 29489251BACKGROUNDWalker-Bone K, Palmer KT, Reading I, Coggon D, Cooper C. Prevalence and impact of musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb in the general population. Arthritis Rheum. 2004 Aug 15;51(4):642-51. doi: 10.1002/art.20535.
PMID: 15334439BACKGROUNDSarasua SM, Floyd S, Bridges WC, Pill SG. The epidemiology and etiology of adhesive capsulitis in the U.S. Medicare population. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Sep 27;22(1):828. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04704-9.
PMID: 34579697BACKGROUNDMillar NL, Meakins A, Struyf F, Willmore E, Campbell AL, Kirwan PD, Akbar M, Moore L, Ronquillo JC, Murrell GAC, Rodeo SA. Frozen shoulder. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2022 Sep 8;8(1):59. doi: 10.1038/s41572-022-00386-2.
PMID: 36075904BACKGROUNDMertens MG, Meert L, Struyf F, Schwank A, Meeus M. Exercise Therapy Is Effective for Improvement in Range of Motion, Function, and Pain in Patients With Frozen Shoulder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 May;103(5):998-1012.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.07.806. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
PMID: 34425089BACKGROUNDRussell S, Jariwala A, Conlon R, Selfe J, Richards J, Walton M. A blinded, randomized, controlled trial assessing conservative management strategies for frozen shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Apr;23(4):500-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.12.026.
PMID: 24630545BACKGROUNDRobinson PM, Norris J, Roberts CP. Randomized controlled trial of supervised physiotherapy versus a home exercise program after hydrodilatation for the management of primary frozen shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 May;26(5):757-765. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.01.012. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
PMID: 28318848BACKGROUNDChalloumas D, Biddle M, McLean M, Millar NL. Comparison of Treatments for Frozen Shoulder: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1;3(12):e2029581. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.29581.
PMID: 33326025BACKGROUNDPandey V, Madi S. Clinical Guidelines in the Management of Frozen Shoulder: An Update! Indian J Orthop. 2021 Feb 1;55(2):299-309. doi: 10.1007/s43465-021-00351-3. eCollection 2021 Apr.
PMID: 33912325BACKGROUNDGleyze P, Clavert P, Flurin PH, Laprelle E, Katz D, Toussaint B, Benkalfate T, Charousset C, Joudet T, Georges T, Hubert L, Lafosse L, Hardy P, Solignac N, Levigne C; French Arthroscopy Society. Management of the stiff shoulder. A prospective multicenter comparative study of the six main techniques in use: 235 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011 Dec;97(8 Suppl):S167-81. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2011.09.004. Epub 2011 Oct 28.
PMID: 22036993BACKGROUNDHardage J, Peel C, Morris D, Graham C, Brown C, Foushee HR, Braswell J. Adherence to Exercise Scale for Older Patients (AESOP): a measure for predicting exercise adherence in older adults after discharge from home health physical therapy. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2007;30(2):69-78. doi: 10.1519/00139143-200708000-00006.
PMID: 18171490BACKGROUNDChen HC, Chuang TY, Lin PC, Lin YK, Chuang YH. Effects of Messages Delivered by Mobile Phone on Increasing Compliance With Shoulder Exercises Among Patients With a Frozen Shoulder. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2017 Jul;49(4):429-437. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12308. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
PMID: 28632975BACKGROUNDLiao CH, Wu YT, Cheng CT, Ooyang CH, Kang SC, Fu CY, Hsu YP, Hsieh CH, Chen CC. An Image-Based Mobile Health App for Postdrainage Monitoring: Usability Study. J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 28;22(8):e17686. doi: 10.2196/17686.
PMID: 32857060BACKGROUNDPfeifer AC, Uddin R, Schroder-Pfeifer P, Holl F, Swoboda W, Schiltenwolf M. Mobile Application-Based Interventions for Chronic Pain Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Effectiveness. J Clin Med. 2020 Nov 5;9(11):3557. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113557.
PMID: 33167300BACKGROUNDSteiner B, Richter I, Elgert L, Haux R, Wolf KH. Mobile Health Applications for Rehabilitation of Musculoskeletal Diseases of the Shoulder: A Systematic Analysis. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2021 May 24;278:195-202. doi: 10.3233/SHTI210069.
PMID: 34042894BACKGROUNDElgert L, Steiner B, Saalfeld B, Marschollek M, Wolf KH. Health-Enabling Technologies to Assist Patients With Musculoskeletal Shoulder Disorders When Exercising at Home: Scoping Review. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021 Feb 4;8(1):e21107. doi: 10.2196/21107.
PMID: 33538701BACKGROUNDCarbonaro N, Lucchesi I, Lorusssi F, Tognetti A. Tele-monitoring and tele-rehabilitation of the shoulder muscular-skeletal diseases through wearable systems. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2018 Jul;2018:4410-4413. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2018.8513371.
PMID: 30441330BACKGROUNDStutz T, Emsenhuber G, Huber D, Domhardt M, Tiefengrabner M, Oostingh GJ, Fotschl U, Matis N, Ginzinger S. Mobile Phone-Supported Physiotherapy for Frozen Shoulder: Feasibility Assessment Based on a Usability Study. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017 Jul 20;4(2):e6. doi: 10.2196/rehab.7085.
PMID: 28729234BACKGROUNDChoi Y, Nam J, Yang D, Jung W, Lee HR, Kim SH. Effect of smartphone application-supported self-rehabilitation for frozen shoulder: a prospective randomized control study. Clin Rehabil. 2019 Apr;33(4):653-660. doi: 10.1177/0269215518818866. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
PMID: 30526016BACKGROUNDBulgen DY, Binder AI, Hazleman BL, Dutton J, Roberts S. Frozen shoulder: prospective clinical study with an evaluation of three treatment regimens. Ann Rheum Dis. 1984 Jun;43(3):353-60. doi: 10.1136/ard.43.3.353.
PMID: 6742895BACKGROUNDKelley MJ, Shaffer MA, Kuhn JE, Michener LA, Seitz AL, Uhl TL, Godges JJ, McClure PW. Shoulder pain and mobility deficits: adhesive capsulitis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013 May;43(5):A1-31. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2013.0302. Epub 2013 Apr 30. No abstract available.
PMID: 23636125BACKGROUNDMintken PE, Glynn P, Cleland JA. Psychometric properties of the shortened disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH) and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with shoulder pain. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 Nov-Dec;18(6):920-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2008.12.015. Epub 2009 Mar 17.
PMID: 19297202BACKGROUNDDawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about shoulder surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996 Jul;78(4):593-600.
PMID: 8682827BACKGROUNDDawson J, Rogers K, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A. The Oxford shoulder score revisited. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009 Jan;129(1):119-23. doi: 10.1007/s00402-007-0549-7. Epub 2008 Jan 9.
PMID: 18183410BACKGROUNDRangan A, Brealey SD, Keding A, Corbacho B, Northgraves M, Kottam L, Goodchild L, Srikesavan C, Rex S, Charalambous CP, Hanchard N, Armstrong A, Brooksbank A, Carr A, Cooper C, Dias JJ, Donnelly I, Hewitt C, Lamb SE, McDaid C, Richardson G, Rodgers S, Sharp E, Spencer S, Torgerson D, Toye F; UK FROST Study Group. Management of adults with primary frozen shoulder in secondary care (UK FROST): a multicentre, pragmatic, three-arm, superiority randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 2020 Oct 3;396(10256):977-989. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31965-6.
PMID: 33010843BACKGROUNDSharma SP, Baerheim A, Kvale A. Passive range of motion in patients with adhesive shoulder capsulitis, an intertester reliability study over eight weeks. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Feb 22;16:37. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0495-4.
PMID: 25888419BACKGROUNDBeaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN; Upper Extremity Collaborative Group. Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 May;87(5):1038-46. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02060.
PMID: 15866967BACKGROUNDGummesson C, Ward MM, Atroshi I. The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH): validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006 May 18;7:44. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-44.
PMID: 16709254BACKGROUNDLiang HW, Wang HK, Yao G, Horng YS, Hou SM. Psychometric evaluation of the Taiwan version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. J Formos Med Assoc. 2004 Oct;103(10):773-9.
PMID: 15490028BACKGROUNDVorrink SN, Kort HS, Troosters T, Lammers JW. A Mobile Phone App to Stimulate Daily Physical Activity in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Development, Feasibility, and Pilot Studies. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Jan 26;4(1):e11. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.4741.
PMID: 26813682BACKGROUNDCho CH, Kim du H, Bae KC, Lee D, Kim K. Proper site of corticosteroid injection for the treatment of idiopathic frozen shoulder: Results from a randomized trial. Joint Bone Spine. 2016 May;83(3):324-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2015.06.014. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
PMID: 26875065BACKGROUNDTallia AF, Cardone DA. Diagnostic and therapeutic injection of the shoulder region. Am Fam Physician. 2003 Mar 15;67(6):1271-8.
PMID: 12674455BACKGROUNDCho CH, Min BW, Bae KC, Lee KJ, Kim DH. A prospective double-blind randomized trial on ultrasound-guided versus blind intra-articular corticosteroid injections for primary frozen shoulder. Bone Joint J. 2021 Feb;103-B(2):353-359. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B2.BJJ-2020-0755.R1.
PMID: 33517741BACKGROUNDDeng Z, Li Z, Li X, Chen Z, Shen C, Sun X, Shu H, Wu J, Tang K. Comparison of Outcomes of Two Different Corticosteroid Injection Approaches for Primary Frozen Shoulder: A Randomized Controlled Study. J Rehabil Med. 2023 Jan 3;55:jrm00361. doi: 10.2340/jrm.v55.2201.
PMID: 36597664BACKGROUNDWu T, Song HX, Dong Y, Li JH. Ultrasound-guided versus blind subacromial-subdeltoid bursa injection in adults with shoulder pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2015 Dec;45(3):374-8. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2015.05.011. Epub 2015 May 21.
PMID: 26590864BACKGROUNDAntoine Parker C, Ellis R. Effect of Electronic Messaging on Physical Activity Participation among Older Adults. J Aging Res. 2016;2016:6171028. doi: 10.1155/2016/6171028. Epub 2016 May 17.
PMID: 27293891BACKGROUNDKim BH, Glanz K. Text messaging to motivate walking in older African Americans: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med. 2013 Jan;44(1):71-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.09.050.
PMID: 23253653BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Chih-Chi Chen
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Outcome assessor blind to the arm of the subjects
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principle investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 21, 2022
First Posted
August 8, 2023
Study Start
September 11, 2022
Primary Completion
October 20, 2023
Study Completion
December 31, 2023
Last Updated
April 3, 2025
Record last verified: 2022-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share