NCT05978674

Brief Summary

The study was planned to determine the effect of rocking bed applied to preterm newborns on comfort, physiological parameters and cerebral oxygenase level (rSO2).

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
36

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 15, 2021

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 15, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 15, 2022

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 20, 2023

Completed
18 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 7, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

August 7, 2023

Status Verified

July 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

July 20, 2023

Last Update Submit

August 4, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Information Form

    In the form prepared by the researchers in line with the literature in order to collect introductory information about the baby; There are questions for the baby such as gender, mode of delivery, weight at birth, Apgar score (1st and 5th value), gestational age at birth, postnatal age, weight in the study, diet, type of food, frequency of vomiting (O'Reilly et al., 2011; Provasi et al., 2021; Zimmerman \& Barlow, 2012). For the final version of the form, opinions were received from 2 nurses and 1 neonatology specialist, who are experts in pediatric nursing.

    First measurement- At 15 minutes after admission in the study

  • COMFORT Scale

    The COMFORT Scale was developed by Ambuel et al. (1992) to determine the comfort and distress of patients in the pediatric intensive care unit. The comfort of the newborn is evaluated through 7 parameters, including muscle tone, calmness/agitation, facial tension, body movements, crying, and respiratory response with YKDS. If the newborn receives mechanical ventilator support, "respiratory response" is scored, and if the newborn is breathing spontaneously, "crying" items are scored. For this reason, the overall scoring of the scale is based on 6 items, and the scores that can be obtained from the scale vary between 6 and 30. A low score from the scale indicates comfort, while an increase in score indicates pain or distress in the newborn (Kahraman et al., 2014; Van Dijk et al., 2009). The Turkish validity and reliability study of YKDS was conducted by Kahraman et al. in 2014 (Kahraman, Başbakal, \& Yalaz, 2014).

    First measurement: T0: just before the intervention

  • Newborn Follow-up Form

    This form, created by the researchers, contains information on physiological parameters (heart rate, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation) and cerebral rSO2 values (Provasi et al., 2021; Zimmerman \& Barlow, 2012). The information in the Follow-up Form was evaluated just before the intervention (TO), at the 15th minute of the intervention (T1), at the 30th minute of the intervention (T2), and 15 minutes after the intervention (T3). The form was finalized by taking the opinions of 2 nurses and 1 neonatology specialist, who are experts in pediatric nursing. Physiological parameters of the newborn were followed from the Philips IntelliVue MP40 branded neonatal monitor suitable for neonatal use, and cerebral rSO2 was monitored with the INVOS™ 5100C Cerebral/Somatic Oximeter brand NIRS device available in the clinic.

    First measurement: T0: just before the intervention

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • COMFORT Scale

    Second measurement: T1: 15th minute of the intervention

  • Newborn Follow-up Form

    Second measurement: T1: 15th minute of the intervention

  • COMFORT Scale

    Third measurement: T2: 30th minute of the intervention

  • Newborn Follow-up Form

    Third measurement: T2: 30th minute of the intervention

  • COMFORT Scale

    Fourth measurement: T3: 15 minutes after the end of the intervention

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Experimental Group: rocking bed group

EXPERIMENTAL

Preterms in the intervention group will lie in a rocking bed for a consecutive two-hour period without treatment and invasive procedures. During 30 minutes of this period, the rocking bed will be in the rocking mode and will stop at the end of 30 minutes.

Behavioral: rocking bed group

Control Group

NO INTERVENTION

Newborns in the control group will be followed in a fixed bed (open bed or incubator).

Interventions

Babies assigned to the intervention group first will be placed on a rocking bed after routine care such as feeding and diaper changes and when the newborn is stable. A rocking attempt will be applied to the baby placed in the rocking bed for 30 minutes. After 30 minutes, the baby will not be lifted from the bed and will lie in bed for 90 minutes. After a period of two hours in total, the babies will be cared for and fed. Then, babies will be quota and control group measurements will be made.

Experimental Group: rocking bed group

Eligibility Criteria

Age32 Weeks - 37 Weeks
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Born at 32-37 weeks of postmenstruel age
  • Not receiving mechanical ventilation support,
  • Not receiving analgesia or sedative drug therapy,
  • Congenital anomaly, intraventricular hemorrhage, meningitis, chromosomal anomalies, cyanotic congenital heart diseases, neonatal seizures and preterm infants without a diagnosis of sepsis

You may not qualify if:

  • Infants with diseases that may decrease cerebral oxygenation such as cerebral edema, intraventricular hemorrhage, cerebral hypoxia will be excluded from the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Selcuk University

Konya, Selcuklu, 42100, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Ambuel B, Hamlett KW, Marx CM, Blumer JL. Assessing distress in pediatric intensive care environments: the COMFORT scale. J Pediatr Psychol. 1992 Feb;17(1):95-109. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/17.1.95.

    PMID: 1545324BACKGROUND
  • Eldridge SM, Chan CL, Campbell MJ, Bond CM, Hopewell S, Thabane L, Lancaster GA; PAFS consensus group. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. BMJ. 2016 Oct 24;355:i5239. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5239.

    PMID: 27777223BACKGROUND
  • O'Reilly R, Grindle C, Zwicky EF, Morlet T. Development of the vestibular system and balance function: differential diagnosis in the pediatric population. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2011 Apr;44(2):251-71, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2011.01.001.

    PMID: 21474003BACKGROUND
  • Provasi J, Blanc L, Carchon I. The Importance of Rhythmic Stimulation for Preterm Infants in the NICU. Children (Basel). 2021 Jul 29;8(8):660. doi: 10.3390/children8080660.

    PMID: 34438551BACKGROUND
  • van Dijk M, Roofthooft DW, Anand KJ, Guldemond F, de Graaf J, Simons S, de Jager Y, van Goudoever JB, Tibboel D. Taking up the challenge of measuring prolonged pain in (premature) neonates: the COMFORTneo scale seems promising. Clin J Pain. 2009 Sep;25(7):607-16. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181a5b52a.

    PMID: 19692803BACKGROUND
  • Zimmerman E, Barlow SM. The effects of vestibular stimulation rate and magnitude of acceleration on central pattern generation for chest wall kinematics in preterm infants. J Perinatol. 2012 Aug;32(8):614-20. doi: 10.1038/jp.2011.177. Epub 2011 Dec 8.

    PMID: 22157627BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Premature Birth

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Obstetric Labor, PrematureObstetric Labor ComplicationsPregnancy ComplicationsFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital Diseases

Study Officials

  • Sibel Küçükoğlu, Prof

    Selcuk University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: The study was planned to be conducted in a randomized controlled crossover design. Infants meeting the inclusion criteria will be divided into two groups, group A and group B, according to block randomization. Groups were determined by drawing lots. (A= Rocking bed; B= Jeans) Accordingly, babies included in group A will be taken to the rocking bed first. Babies included in group B will be quoted first. Babies will be laid in these beds for an average of 2 hours. In cross-over design, a washout is recommended in order to control the carry over effect that may result from the interference. We assumed that the total time without interference would be sufficient to control the carryover effect, since the oscillation interference was only applied for half an hour in a two-hour sleep cycle, and there was routine maintenance and feeding cycles between measurements (average 20 min).
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Faculty of Nursing

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 20, 2023

First Posted

August 7, 2023

Study Start

March 15, 2021

Primary Completion

September 15, 2022

Study Completion

September 15, 2022

Last Updated

August 7, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations