The Effect of Concave Healing Abutment on Soft Tissue Healing
Effect of the Shape of the Healing Abutment on Soft Tissue Healing. A Randomized Clinical Study Involving an Enhanced Digital Superposition Methodology
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to document the relevance of the concave abutment to form more gingiva when compared to the straight abutment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 27, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 4, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2025
CompletedAugust 4, 2023
July 1, 2023
3.4 years
July 27, 2023
July 27, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Thickness of the peri-implant gingiva at the level of the largest mismatch between the straight and the concave abutment
The thickness of the gingiva will be measured on the superposition set including the STL of the abutments on the vestibular and lingual/palatal sides
end of healing, 6-8 weeks after implant surgery
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Height of the peri-implant gingiva at the level of the largest mismatch between the straight and the concave abutment
end of healing, 6-8 weeks after implant surgery
Study Arms (1)
concave abutment vs. straight abutment
EXPERIMENTALAfter implant is placed a randomization will determine if the implant receives a straight or a concave abutment. If a patient requires 2 implants, one of them will be straight and the other will be concave. A patient can therefore have both abutments.
Interventions
dental implants are placed as usual and require a healing abutment. Abutments can be straight or concave, both are equally available on the market.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- a) patients older than 18 years in need of implant therapy in the posterior area of the mandible and maxilla, b) good general/systemic health (ASA type I, II), c) patients who committed to attend all visits of the study, d) placement of a Ø 4.2 mm implant without requiring bone augmentation, e) adequate oral hygiene with FMPS (full mouth plaque score) \< 15% before surgery, f) absence of uncontrolled periodontal disease, g) agreeing to sign an informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- a) patients with a contributing medical history in which any surgery, disease, condition, or medication susceptible to compromise the healing of soft and hard tissues (e.g. non-controlled diabetes), b) liver function disorder, c) immune system disease, d) immunosuppressant drugs, e) toxic habits other than smoking that might compromise or affect healing, f) patients who have undergone chemotherapy or radiation treatment during the previous 5 years comprising the head and neck area, g) corticosteroids therapy or any other medication that could influence postoperative healing and/or osseointegration, h) bisphosphonate or Denosumab therapy (Prolia®), i) sites that underwent or require a horizontal or vertical bone regeneration procedure, j) inability or unwillingness to attend follow-up visits, k) patients unwilling to sign an informed consent form.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- MIS Implant Technologies, Ltdlead
- Charite University, Berlin, Germanycollaborator
- Sachsen Praxen Zahnarztpraxiscollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Mis Implants Technologies Ltd.
Misgav Regional Council, 2015600, Israel
Related Publications (1)
Lilet R, Desiron M, Finelle G, Lecloux G, Seidel L, Lambert F. Immediate implant placement combining socket seal abutment and peri-implant socket filling: A prospective case series. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Jan;33(1):33-44. doi: 10.1111/clr.13852. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
PMID: 34551159RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Rasmus Sperber, Dr
Sachen Praxen
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- each implant receives either a straight or a concave abutment. The patient is not aware of the type of abutment.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 27, 2023
First Posted
August 4, 2023
Study Start
April 1, 2021
Primary Completion
September 1, 2024
Study Completion
January 1, 2025
Last Updated
August 4, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share