NCT05975814

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to document the relevance of the concave abutment to form more gingiva when compared to the straight abutment.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2021

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2021

Completed
2.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 27, 2023

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 4, 2023

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2024

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

August 4, 2023

Status Verified

July 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

3.4 years

First QC Date

July 27, 2023

Last Update Submit

July 27, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

dental implantsconcave abutmentsintra-oral scansCBCTsoft tissue thicknessrandomized clinical study

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Thickness of the peri-implant gingiva at the level of the largest mismatch between the straight and the concave abutment

    The thickness of the gingiva will be measured on the superposition set including the STL of the abutments on the vestibular and lingual/palatal sides

    end of healing, 6-8 weeks after implant surgery

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Height of the peri-implant gingiva at the level of the largest mismatch between the straight and the concave abutment

    end of healing, 6-8 weeks after implant surgery

Study Arms (1)

concave abutment vs. straight abutment

EXPERIMENTAL

After implant is placed a randomization will determine if the implant receives a straight or a concave abutment. If a patient requires 2 implants, one of them will be straight and the other will be concave. A patient can therefore have both abutments.

Device: dental implant

Interventions

dental implants are placed as usual and require a healing abutment. Abutments can be straight or concave, both are equally available on the market.

concave abutment vs. straight abutment

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • a) patients older than 18 years in need of implant therapy in the posterior area of the mandible and maxilla, b) good general/systemic health (ASA type I, II), c) patients who committed to attend all visits of the study, d) placement of a Ø 4.2 mm implant without requiring bone augmentation, e) adequate oral hygiene with FMPS (full mouth plaque score) \< 15% before surgery, f) absence of uncontrolled periodontal disease, g) agreeing to sign an informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • a) patients with a contributing medical history in which any surgery, disease, condition, or medication susceptible to compromise the healing of soft and hard tissues (e.g. non-controlled diabetes), b) liver function disorder, c) immune system disease, d) immunosuppressant drugs, e) toxic habits other than smoking that might compromise or affect healing, f) patients who have undergone chemotherapy or radiation treatment during the previous 5 years comprising the head and neck area, g) corticosteroids therapy or any other medication that could influence postoperative healing and/or osseointegration, h) bisphosphonate or Denosumab therapy (Prolia®), i) sites that underwent or require a horizontal or vertical bone regeneration procedure, j) inability or unwillingness to attend follow-up visits, k) patients unwilling to sign an informed consent form.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Mis Implants Technologies Ltd.

Misgav Regional Council, 2015600, Israel

RECRUITING

Related Publications (1)

  • Lilet R, Desiron M, Finelle G, Lecloux G, Seidel L, Lambert F. Immediate implant placement combining socket seal abutment and peri-implant socket filling: A prospective case series. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Jan;33(1):33-44. doi: 10.1111/clr.13852. Epub 2021 Oct 22.

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Dental Implants

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Dental MaterialsBiomedical and Dental MaterialsDental ProsthesisProsthodonticsDentistryProstheses and ImplantsEquipment and SuppliesManufactured MaterialsTechnology, Industry, and Agriculture

Study Officials

  • Rasmus Sperber, Dr

    Sachen Praxen

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Masking Details
each implant receives either a straight or a concave abutment. The patient is not aware of the type of abutment.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: clinical study
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 27, 2023

First Posted

August 4, 2023

Study Start

April 1, 2021

Primary Completion

September 1, 2024

Study Completion

January 1, 2025

Last Updated

August 4, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations