NCT05973669

Brief Summary

MED-EL Remote Care is a way for MED-EL cochlear implant users to check their hearing and cochlear implant device from any location, without the need for a scheduled, in-person appointment with their audiologist. This study will assess the effectiveness, efficiencies, and useability of MED-EL Remote Care.

Trial Health

78
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
6mo left

Started Nov 2024

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
2 countries

5 active sites

Status
enrolling by invitation

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress76%
Nov 2024Nov 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 14, 2023

Completed
20 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 3, 2023

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 5, 2024

Completed
2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2026

Last Updated

April 16, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

July 14, 2023

Last Update Submit

April 13, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

cochlear implantstelehealthremote care

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Remote Care Completion

    Number and proportion of fully completed Remote Care visits.

    Up to 6 months post-training

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Patient time savings

    Up to 6 months post-training

  • Patient cost estimates

    Up to 6 months post-training

  • Clinician time savings

    Up to 6 months post-training

  • Patient Feedback Survey

    Up to 6 months post-training

  • Clinician Feedback Survey

    Mid-enrollment to enrollment completion

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Remote cochlear implant support

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will use MED-EL Remote Care to test their hearing and device functionality. Participants and clinicians will complete user feedback surveys regarding their experience and time/cost-savings.

Device: MED-EL Remote Care

Interventions

Remote cochlear implant support

Remote cochlear implant support

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Implanted with at least one MED-EL cochlear implant
  • ≥ 2 weeks since activation of the cochlear implant
  • Availability of existing aided Pediatric/AZ Bio (quiet and/or noise) and CNC word scores, or the ability to complete these at baseline
  • Utilizing a compatible audio processor in the SONNET or RONDO product lines
  • Ability to complete app-based hearing assessments
  • Commitment to comply with all study procedures for the duration of the study
  • Access to the internet via a smartphone that meets the following requirements:
  • Android or iOS operating systems
  • A smartphone supporting Bluetooth® 4.2 or higher
  • A minimum of 200 MB free storage space

You may not qualify if:

  • Inability or unwillingness to perform the requirements of the clinical investigation
  • Unrealistic expectations regarding the possible benefits, risks, and limitations of remote cochlear implant care
  • Inability of the subject or caregiver to demonstrate basic skills for operating a smartphone, computer, or app-based tasks after training by the investigator

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (5)

University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics

Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States

Location

University of Michigan

Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48108, United States

Location

University of North Carolina

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States

Location

London Health Sciences Centre

London, Ontario, N6A 5A5, Canada

Location

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5, Canada

Location

Related Publications (9)

  • Maruthurkkara S, Case S, Rottier R. Evaluation of Remote Check: A Clinical Tool for Asynchronous Monitoring and Triage of Cochlear Implant Recipients. Ear Hear. 2022 Mar/Apr;43(2):495-506. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001106.

    PMID: 34320523BACKGROUND
  • Takano K, Kaizaki A, Kimura A, Nomura K, Yamazaki N, Shintani T, Himi T. Telefitting of Nucleus Cochlear Implants: A Feasibility Study. Am J Audiol. 2021 Mar 10;30(1):16-21. doi: 10.1044/2020_AJA-20-00041. Epub 2021 Feb 8.

    PMID: 33555935BACKGROUND
  • Slager HK, Jensen J, Kozlowski K, Teagle H, Park LR, Biever A, Mears M. Remote Programming of Cochlear Implants. Otol Neurotol. 2019 Mar;40(3):e260-e266. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002119.

    PMID: 30741905BACKGROUND
  • Cullington H, Kitterick P, Weal M, Margol-Gromada M. Feasibility of personalised remote long-term follow-up of people with cochlear implants: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 20;8(4):e019640. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019640.

    PMID: 29678970BACKGROUND
  • Schepers K, Steinhoff HJ, Ebenhoch H, Bock K, Bauer K, Rupprecht L, Moltner A, Morettini S, Hagen R. Remote programming of cochlear implants in users of all ages. Acta Otolaryngol. 2019 Mar;139(3):251-257. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2018.1554264.

    PMID: 31056039BACKGROUND
  • Hughes ML, Sevier JD, Choi S. Techniques for Remotely Programming Children With Cochlear Implants Using Pediatric Audiological Methods via Telepractice. Am J Audiol. 2018 Nov 19;27(3S):385-390. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJA-IMIA3-18-0002.

    PMID: 30452743BACKGROUND
  • Eikelboom RH, Jayakody DM, Swanepoel DW, Chang S, Atlas MD. Validation of remote mapping of cochlear implants. J Telemed Telecare. 2014 Jun;20(4):171-177. doi: 10.1177/1357633X14529234. Epub 2014 Mar 27.

    PMID: 24675003BACKGROUND
  • McElveen JT Jr, Blackburn EL, Green JD Jr, McLear PW, Thimsen DJ, Wilson BS. Remote programming of cochlear implants: a telecommunications model. Otol Neurotol. 2010 Sep;31(7):1035-40. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181d35d87.

    PMID: 20147864BACKGROUND
  • Ramos A, Rodriguez C, Martinez-Beneyto P, Perez D, Gault A, Falcon JC, Boyle P. Use of telemedicine in the remote programming of cochlear implants. Acta Otolaryngol. 2009 May;129(5):533-40. doi: 10.1080/00016480802294369.

    PMID: 18649152BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hearing Loss, SensorineuralHearing Disorders

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Hearing LossEar DiseasesOtorhinolaryngologic DiseasesSensation DisordersNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 14, 2023

First Posted

August 3, 2023

Study Start

November 5, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2026

Last Updated

April 16, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Locations