NCT05967962

Brief Summary

To explore the role of sensory modulation dysfunction (SMD) (i.e., a neurodevelopmental state altering the sensory perception, severely interfering with daily function) as a risk factor for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), its co-occurring pain, and impeded cognitive functions, following exposure to combat trauma.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
248

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2023

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 8, 2023

Completed
23 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2023

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 1, 2023

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2024

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 28, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

March 10, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

April 8, 2023

Last Update Submit

March 7, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

sensory processingexecutive functiontraumaperitrauma

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ)

    A 17 item self-report questionnaire assessing daily pain sensitivity, aimed to quantify everyday somatosensory pain sensitivity to imagined painful daily life situations. Participants rate the intensity of imagined pain on a 10-point scale: 'not painful at all' (0) to 'the worst pain imaginable' (10). The Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire provides a total score (range 17-170) and two sub-scores.

    Change from immediately before and immediately after the manipulation and 40 days post undertaking the manipulation

  • Spontaneously occurring memories

    Diaries will be utilized for reporting spontaneously occurring memories of the film, consisting of 6 items of which 1 is an open question. This will be filled once a day for 6 days starting the next day after the trauma film paradigm was undertaken. Thereafter, it will be filled in again in T3 and T4

    Change between T2, T3, T4: SpecificallyT2-during 6 days, starting the day after undertaking the experiment = trauma film paradigm, 10 (T3); and 40 (T4) days follow-up, following experimental manipulation

Secondary Outcomes (11)

  • Salivary cortisol

    Change between T1 and T2: (immediately before and immediately after the manipulation = trauma film paradigm)

  • Heart rate

    Change between: immediately before (T1) and immediately after the manipulation = trauma film paradigm (T2)

  • skin conductance

    Change between: immediately before (T1) and immediately after the manipulation = trauma film paradigm (T2)

  • Executive function

    Change between T1 and T2: ( immediately before and immediately after the manipulation= trauma film paradigm)

  • Quantitative sensory testing- pain psychophysics

    Change between T1 and T2: (immediately before and immediately after the manipulation = trauma film paradigm)

  • +6 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (7)

  • Sensory responsiveness questionnaire (SRQ)

    Baseline ( screening phase)

  • The Dissociation Experiences Scale-II (DES-II)

    Baseline ( screening phase)

  • Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire (VVIQ)

    Baseline ( screening phase)

  • +4 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

traumatic (scenes of injury and death during combat)

EXPERIMENTAL

In the experimental group participants will be exposed to a traumatic scene, to simulate combat exposure by watching 16 min traumatic combat scenes from the TV series "When Heroes Fly.

Behavioral: The Trauma Film Paradigm

non-traumatic (neutral) film

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

In this active control group, participants will be watching 16 min. non-traumatic, neutral scene showing combatants as well (scenes from the YouTube series "Warriors").

Behavioral: non-traumatic (neutral) film

Interventions

non-traumatic (neutral) film

non-traumatic (neutral) film

Trauma film paradigm is a well-known, validated and established procedure that produces reactions similar to those generated by trauma, and that is often used in research to predict susceptibility for peritraumatic and posttraumatic reactions. In this study the trauma film paradigm will be utilized to simulate combat exposure. The two groups of participants will undergo the trauma film paradigm by watching 16 min traumatic combat scenes vs. non-traumatic movie scenes, respectively. Participants will be given standardized instructions (i.e., ''Imagine you are present at the scene"; "Do not close your eyes").

traumatic (scenes of injury and death during combat)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 28 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Intact or corrected vision
  • Proficiency in Hebrew

You may not qualify if:

  • Neurological disorders
  • Psychiatric disorders
  • Neurodevelopmental disorders
  • Substance use disorder
  • Chronic pain
  • Regular intake of medications.
  • Cultural and societal backgrounds that might bias participant reaction to study protocol (i.e., nationality)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Dr. Tami Bar-Shalita

Tel Aviv, Israel

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stress Disorders, Post-TraumaticWounds and Injuries

Interventions

Motion Pictures

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Stress Disorders, TraumaticTrauma and Stressor Related DisordersMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Audiovisual AidsEducational TechnologyTechnologyTechnology, Industry, and Agriculture

Study Officials

  • Tami Bar-Shalita, PhD

    Tel Aviv University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Yael Lahav, PhD

    Tel Aviv University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Michal Lifshitz, MD

    Israel Defense Forces

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Assessors will be blind to group allocation
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: A randomized controlled trial with an experimental group and a control group: Specifically participants will be screened for SMD, thereafter randomization will be applied within each group: with and without SMD, separately.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 8, 2023

First Posted

August 1, 2023

Study Start

May 1, 2023

Primary Completion

December 31, 2024

Study Completion

February 28, 2025

Last Updated

March 10, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Will be available upon request

Locations