Modern Urodynamics System Efficacy (MUSE) Study
MUSE
1 other identifier
interventional
38
1 country
5
Brief Summary
The goal of this prospective trial is to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of the Glean Urodynamics System (GUS) for use in the clinic to collect vesical pressure data in adult males and females with lower urinary tract symptoms. The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are: • What is the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of GUS for use in clinical to collect vesical pressure data in adult males and females with lower urinary tract symptoms? Participants will undergo a planned conventional urodynamics exam after which the Glean Sensor will be inserted and ambulatory urodynamics will be performed with the sensor indwelling in the bladder after which the sensor will be removed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2023
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 7, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 25, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 21, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 18, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 18, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 18, 2025
CompletedDecember 18, 2025
December 1, 2025
8 months
July 7, 2023
November 3, 2025
December 3, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Percentage of Participants With Insertion Success
Percent of insertion attempts of the Glean sensor deemed successful
during the insertion procedure of a device
Percentage of Participants With a Device-related SAE
Device-related serious adverse events
up to 2 weeks
Percentage of Participants With Removal Success
Percent of removal attempts of the Glean sensor deemed successful
during the removal procedure of a device
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Participants Rating Overall Comfort of Glean Urodynamics as Comfortable or Extremely Comfortable
asked at end of Glean Urodynamics procedure
Study Arms (1)
Glean Urodynamics System
EXPERIMENTALWireless, catheter-free urodynamics system
Interventions
Wireless, catheter-free urodynamics system
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female patient must be ≥ 18 years of age
- Patient must have a diagnosis of LUTD
- Patient must be scheduled for or recommended for cUDS
- Patient is able to tolerate 18Fr catheterization
- Patient or patient's legally authorized representative is able to provide informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant (as confirmed by urine pregnancy test) or breastfeeding, pregnant within the past 6 months or intend to become pregnant during the study period.
- Patient has a symptomatic UTI based on CDC guidance (see below)
- Subjects who, at the principal investigator's determination, would not be appropriate for this study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Bright Urolead
Study Sites (5)
Tri Valley Urology
Murrieta, California, 92562, United States
Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian
Newport Beach, California, 92663, United States
Stony Brook Medicine
East Setauket, New York, 11733, United States
Palmetto Adult and Children's Urology
North Charleston, South Carolina, 29406, United States
Urology Partners of North Texas
Arlington, Texas, 76017, United States
Related Publications (2)
Frainey BT, Majerus SJA, Derisavifard S, Lewis KC, Williams AR, Balog BM, Butler RS, Goldman HB, Damaser MS. First in Human Subjects Testing of the UroMonitor: A Catheter-free Wireless Ambulatory Bladder Pressure Monitor. J Urol. 2023 Jul;210(1):186-195. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003451. Epub 2023 Jun 9.
PMID: 37293725BACKGROUNDKim J, Xavier K, Cannon-Smith T, Vaughan T, Vemulapalli S, Zhao H, Aalami-Harandi A, Shah N. The Feasibility and Safety of the Glean Urodynamics System: The Modern Urodynamics System Efficacy Study. J Endourol. 2025 Jun;39(6):625-634. doi: 10.1089/end.2025.0270. Epub 2025 May 2.
PMID: 40314068RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Study not powered for any outcome or any comparisons; small sample size limits validity, generalizability, and applicability; order of procedures (i.e., conventional UDS occurring before Glean UDS) and the variability of standard-of-care may have influenced results such as attribution of harm; and participant recall bias due to the removal of the Glean sensor being the last procedure experienced (Kim, 2025).
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Brittany Carter
- Organization
- Bright Uro
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Brittany Carter, DHSc, MPH
Bright Uro
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DEVICE FEASIBILITY
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 7, 2023
First Posted
July 25, 2023
Study Start
August 21, 2023
Primary Completion
April 18, 2024
Study Completion
April 18, 2024
Last Updated
December 18, 2025
Results First Posted
December 18, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share