NCT05958238

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of an AR/VR oral care training system on the knowledge, attitudes, self-efficacy, and behavioral intentions of students majoring in geriatric care.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
32

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable healthy

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 7, 2023

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 5, 2023

Completed
19 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 24, 2023

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 30, 2023

Completed
21 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 21, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

October 22, 2024

Status Verified

April 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

July 5, 2023

Last Update Submit

October 18, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

ElderlyMedical EducationAugmented RealityVirtual RealityOral Hygiene

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (8)

  • Oral care-related knowledge

    20 statements were used to measure students' knowledge of the oral care of elderly. Ex: Dentures should be cleaned with toothpaste every day. With possible scores of 0-20, a higher score indicated a higher degree of oral care-related knowledge.

    Change from Baseline at 2-week after intervention

  • Oral care-related knowledge

    20 statements were used to measure students' knowledge of the oral care of elderly. Ex: Dentures should be cleaned with toothpaste every day. With possible scores of 0-20, a higher score indicated a higher degree of oral care-related knowledge.

    Change from Baseline at 4-week after intervention

  • Attitude toward oral care

    7 statements were used to measure students' attitude toward oral care of elderly. Ex: Oral care is as important as physical care for the elderly with disabilities. With possible scores of 7-35, a higher score indicated a more positive attitude toward oral care for elderly.

    Change from Baseline at 2-week after intervention

  • Attitude toward oral care

    7 statements were used to measure students' attitude toward oral care of elderly. Ex: Oral care is as important as physical care for the elderly with disabilities. With possible scores of 7-35, a higher score indicated a more positive attitude toward oral care for elderly.

    Change from Baseline at 4-week after intervention

  • Self-efficacy of oral care

    11 statements were used to evaluate students' self-efficacy in provideng the elderly with oral care. Ex: I am confident about assisting the elderly with disabilities in performing soft tissue cleaning. With possible scores of 11-55, a higher score indicated a greater degree of confidence.

    Change from Baseline at 2-week after intervention

  • Self-efficacy of oral care

    11 statements were used to evaluate students' self-efficacy in provideng the elderly with oral care. Ex: I am confident about assisting the elderly with disabilities in performing soft tissue cleaning. With possible scores of 11-55, a higher score indicated a greater degree of confidence.

    Change from Baseline at 4-week after intervention

  • Intention to oral care behaviors

    12 statements were used to measure students' intention to assist elderly. Ex: I will take the initiative to check the suitability of oral care tools for the elderly with disabilities. With possible scores of 12-60, a higher score indicated a higher possibility of performing the behaviors.

    Change from Baseline at 2-week after intervention

  • Intention to oral care behaviors

    12 statements were used to measure students' intention to assist elderly. Ex: I will take the initiative to check the suitability of oral care tools for the elderly with disabilities. With possible scores of 12-60, a higher score indicated a higher possibility of performing the behaviors.

    Change from Baseline at 4-week after intervention

Study Arms (2)

AR/VR group

EXPERIMENTAL

Students in EG recieved a 2-hour AR/VR training for elderly oral healthcare at 2-week and 4-week follow-ups.

Device: AR/VR oral care training system

Traditional teaching group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Students in the CG received thirty minutes oral care training class with same teaching content in AR/VR-based training system by well-trained oral hygienist.

Other: Traditional classroom teaching

Interventions

Students simulated the treatment of the elderly with different physical and oral conditions using virtual situations and employed suitable oral care methods depending on each situation through VR. They learned the Bass brushing technique, the interdental brush cleaning method, and the soft tissue cleaning method through AR.

AR/VR group

The well-trained oral hygienist provided traditional oral care instruction with the same teaching content in the AR/VR-based training system.

Traditional teaching group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 30 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Aged 18-30 years
  • Students majoring in geriatric care
  • Fooyin University of Technology

You may not qualify if:

  • Transfer student

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital

Kaohsiung City, Taiwan

Location

Study Officials

  • HSIAO- LING HUANG, Dr.PH

    Kaohsiung Medical University, College of Dental Medicine, Department of Oral Hygiene

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 5, 2023

First Posted

July 24, 2023

Study Start

April 7, 2023

Primary Completion

November 30, 2023

Study Completion

December 21, 2023

Last Updated

October 22, 2024

Record last verified: 2023-04

Locations