Breathe Easier II: A Dyad-based Multiple Behavior Intervention
BE
A Dyad-based Multiple Behavior Intervention for Reducing Lung Cancer Symptoms - a Pilot Randomized Control Trial (Breathe Easier II)
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This pilot randomized control trial (RCT) will test a 12-week, multiple behavior intervention physical activity and stress management for survivors with early stage lung cancer (stages I-III) and their family members (1 survivor + 1 family member or friend = 1 dyad). The long-term goal of this research is to improve health outcomes for survivors of lung cancer and their family members. The goals of the intervention, Breathe Easier, are symptom reduction (less breathlessness, less fatigue, less stress) and change in multiple behaviors (increase in stress management and increase in physical activity, and decrease tobacco use - if appropriate). Our aim is: To conduct a 6-month, two-group, pilot randomized control trial intervention study with a pre- and post-test study design to estimate preliminary intervention effects on (a) reduction of symptoms (breathlessness, fatigue, and stress) in survivors of non small cell lung cancer (stages I-III) and family members or friends; (b) increase in physical activity behaviors immediately following the intervention and at 3-months; (c) increase in stress management strategies immediately following the intervention and at 3-months; (d) reduction in smoking behavior among participants who smoke tobacco products at study entry immediately following the intervention at 3-months.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 15, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 19, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 21, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2024
CompletedMay 8, 2024
May 1, 2024
1.9 years
May 19, 2023
May 6, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (17)
Physical function behavior change
Measured by self-reported step counting using a pedometer and documented on a daily log.
Daily for 6 months
Physical function behavior change
Objectively measured by wearing an Accelerometer (on the participant's wrist with a velcro band) for 7 days. Measures physical activity intensity (sedentary, light, moderate, vigorous, and very vigorous).
Pre-intervention (Baseline) and post 3-months
Physical function behavior change
Objectively measured by wearing an Accelerometer (on the participant's wrist with a velcro band) for 7 days. Measures physical activity intensity (sedentary, light, moderate, vigorous, and very vigorous).
Pre-intervention (Baseline) and post 6-months
Physical function behavior change
Objectively measured by a Six-minutes Walk Test. Specifically measures physical activity/exercise tolerance. Score = distance traveled in 6 min. measured in meters.
Pre-intervention (Baseline) and post 3-months
Physical function behavior change
Objectively measured by a Six-minutes Walk Test. Specifically measures physical activity/exercise tolerance. Score = distance traveled in 6 min. measured in meters.
Pre-intervention (Baseline) and post 6-months
Stress management behavior change
Measured by self-reported practice of breathing exercises documented on daily logs.
Daily for 6 months
Stress management behavior change
Measured by self-reported meditation practice documented on daily logs.
Daily for 6 months
Change in the symptom of dyspnea
As measured by a validated instrument: Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Dyspnea Short Form (Part 1) Measured by 10 items with a 4-point rating scale measuring shortness of breath (SOB) over the past 7 days (0 = not SOB; 1 = mildly SOB; 2= moderately SOB; 3 = severe SOB). Total score range 0 to 40. The higher the score measures worse SOB.
Pre-intervention (Baseline) and post 3-months
Change in the symptom of dyspnea
As measured by a validated instrument: Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Dyspnea Short Form (Part 1) Measured by 10 items with a 4-point rating scale measuring shortness of breath (SOB) over the past 7 days (0 = not SOB; 1 = mildly SOB; 2= moderately SOB; 3 = severe SOB). Total score range 0 to 40. The higher the score measures worse SOB.
Pre-intervention (Baseline) and post 6-months
Change in the symptom of dyspnea
As measured by a validated instrument: Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Dyspnea Short Form (Part 2). Measured by 10 items with a 4-point rating scale measuring functional limitations due to shortness of breath (SOB) over the past 7 days (0 = no difficulty, 1 = little difficulty; 2= some difficulty; 3 = much difficulty). Total score range 0 to 40. The higher the score measures greater functional difficulty due to SOB.
Pre-intervention (Baseline) and post 3-months
Change in the symptom of dyspnea
As measured by a validated instrument: Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Dyspnea Short Form (Part 2). Measured by 10 items with a 4-point rating scale measuring functional limitations due to shortness of breath (SOB) over the past 7 days (0 = no difficulty, 1 = little difficulty; 2= some difficulty; 3 = much difficulty). Total score range 0 to 40. The higher the score measures greater functional difficulty due to SOB.
Pre-intervention (Baseline) and post 6-months
Change in the symptom of breathlessness
As measured by validated instrument: Modified Medical Research Council - Dyspnea (mMRC) measures respiratory disability. 1 item measures perceived breathlessness. There are 5 statements describing respiratory disability. Scores range from 1 to 5. No disability = "I only get breathless with strenuous exercise" (Grade 1) to "I am too breathless to leave the house" (Grade 5). The higher the score the greater the disability.
Pre-intervention (Baseline) and post 3-months
Change in the symptom of breathlessness
As measured by validated instrument: Modified Medical Research Council - Dyspnea (mMRC) measures respiratory disability. 1 item measures perceived breathlessness. There are 5 statements describing respiratory disability. Scores range from 1 to 5. No disability = "I only get breathless with strenuous exercise" (Grade 1) to "I am too breathless to leave the house" (Grade 5). The higher the score the greater the disability.
Pre-intervention (Baseline) and post 6-months
Change in the symptom of fatigue
As measured by a validated instrument: Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Scale (FACIT)-Fatigue (V.4) measures fatigue. Measured by 13-items with a 4-point rating scale (4 = not fatigued at all; 0 = very much fatigued). Score range is 6 to 52. The higher the score the less fatigue.
Pre-intervention (Baseline) and post 3-months
Change in the symptom of fatigue
As measured by a validated instrument: Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Scale (FACIT)-Fatigue (V.4) measures fatigue. Measured by 13-items with a 4-point rating scale (4 = not fatigued at all; 0 = very much fatigued). Score range is 6 to 52. The higher the score the less fatigue.
Pre-intervention (Baseline) and post 6-months
Change in perceived stress
As measured by a validated instrument: Perceived Stress Scale measures perceived stress using a 10-item scale. There are 5 response items (0 = never, 1 = almost never, 2 = sometimes, 3 = fairly often, 4 = very often). Score ranges from 0 to 40. The higher the score the greater perceived stress.
Pre-intervention (Baseline) and post 3-months
Change in perceived stress
As measured by a validated instrument: Perceived Stress Scale measures perceived stress using a 10-item scale. There are 5 response items (0 = never, 1 = almost never, 2 = sometimes, 3 = fairly often, 4 = very often). Score ranges from 0 to 40. The higher the score the greater perceived stress.
Pre-intervention (Baseline) and post 6-months
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Tobacco use abstinence
Pre-intervention (Baseline) and post 3-months
Tobacco use abstinence
Pre-intervention (Baseline) and post 6-months
Tobacco use abstinence
Pre-intervention (Baseline) and post 3-month
Tobacco use abstinence
Pre-intervention (Baseline) and post 6-months
Tobacco use abstinence
Pre-intervention (Baseline) and post 3-months
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (14)
Sleep quality change
Daily for 7 days at Pre-intervention (Baseline) and post 3-months
Sleep quality change
Daily for 7 days at Pre-intervention (Baseline) and post 6-months
Emotional response to dyspnea change
Daily for 7 days at Pre-intervention (Baseline) and post 3-months
- +11 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Attention Control
ACTIVE COMPARATOR1. Education: Each survivor will receive a copy of "Facing Forward; Life After Cancer Treatment" (No. 18-2424, March 2018). Each family member or friend will receive "When Someone You Love is Being Treated for Cancer" (No. 14-5726, May 2014). Specific parts of booklets will be reviewed during the 15-minute/per participant telephone "chat". 2. Telephone "Chats": The primary purpose is study retention. After the first 12-week period ends the weekly chats will be tapered for 12 weeks. 3. One text message delivered weekly by telephone is a reminder of the day and time of the chat(s). Tobacco Use Reduction: Many survivors of lung cancer struggle with nicotine addiction; smoking cessation and relapse prevention content will be made available to current smokers (The FOREVER FREE program - a free, twelve short booklet evidence-based resource created by the H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center \& Research Institute at the University of South Florida).
BE Intervention Group
EXPERIMENTAL1. The BE Manual is an educational resource for Managing Stress, Increasing Physical Activity (PA) and Stopping Smoking and Staying Smoke free. 2. A timed, weekly telephone counseling session (60 min./dyad max) will be recorded. The purpose is to provide social support with SMART goal setting, adherence monitoring, encouragement.. 3. Breathing Exercises and Meditations are incorporated into the BE Manual and sent by a link via text messages. 4. A Texting Library provides additional education, support, and encouragement daily. There are 5 story lines: BE Active, BE Kind to Yourself, BE Supportive and BE Smoke free (offered to current smokers only). Stay Smoke free will be instituted once tobacco use has stopped. 5. Weekly Logs for tracking goals and progress with behavior changes (PA, breathing practices and meditations) and a pedometer are provided. After 12 weeks, the calls and texts will be tapered.
Interventions
See Intervention Group (IG) description.
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Completed primary treatment for localized NSCLC (stages I-III). Survivors receiving adjuvant therapy are eligible.
- Willing to use a cell phone capable of receiving text messages
- Willing to complete a 12-week, home-based intervention program that includes face-to-face and telephone interaction
- Willing to consider behavior change at this time
- A family member or friend is willing to participate who is at least 21 years old
- Able to speak and read English
- Capable of informed consent
- A health clearance form is signed by a health care provider prior to enrollment
- Willing to use a cell phone capable of receiving text messages
- Willing to complete a 12-week, home-based intervention program that includes face-to-face and telephone interaction
- Willing to consider behavior change at this time
- Has an eligible family member willing to participate who is at least 21 years old
- Able to speak and read English
- Capable of informed consent
- A health clearance form signed by a health care provider prior to enrollment
- +4 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of South Carolinalead
- Brown Universitycollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of South Carolina
Columbia, South Carolina, 29208, United States
Related Publications (80)
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 Jan;72(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
PMID: 35020204BACKGROUNDCox-Martin E, Cox MG, Basen-Engquist K, Bradley C, Blalock JA. Changing multiple health behaviors in cancer survivors: smoking and exercise. Psychol Health Med. 2020 Mar;25(3):331-343. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2019.1679849. Epub 2019 Oct 19.
PMID: 31630537BACKGROUNDBluethmann SM, Mariotto AB, Rowland JH. Anticipating the "Silver Tsunami": Prevalence Trajectories and Comorbidity Burden among Older Cancer Survivors in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Jul;25(7):1029-36. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0133.
PMID: 27371756BACKGROUNDLemjabbar-Alaoui H, Hassan OU, Yang YW, Buchanan P. Lung cancer: Biology and treatment options. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015 Dec;1856(2):189-210. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2015.08.002. Epub 2015 Aug 19.
PMID: 26297204BACKGROUNDYoung RP, Hopkins RJ, Christmas T, Black PN, Metcalf P, Gamble GD. COPD prevalence is increased in lung cancer, independent of age, sex and smoking history. Eur Respir J. 2009 Aug;34(2):380-6. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00144208. Epub 2009 Feb 5.
PMID: 19196816BACKGROUNDCelli BR. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and lung cancer: common pathogenesis, shared clinical challenges. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012 May;9(2):74-9. doi: 10.1513/pats.201107-039MS.
PMID: 22550249BACKGROUNDMcDonnell KK, Bullock LF, Hollen PJ, Heath J, Kozower BD. Emerging issues on the impact of smoking on health-related quality of life in patients with lung cancer and their families. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2014 Apr;18(2):171-81. doi: 10.1188/14.CJON.18-02AP.
PMID: 24534075BACKGROUNDCataldo JK, Dubey S, Prochaska JJ. Smoking cessation: an integral part of lung cancer treatment. Oncology. 2010;78(5-6):289-301. doi: 10.1159/000319937. Epub 2010 Aug 11.
PMID: 20699622BACKGROUNDLowery AE, Krebs P, Coups EJ, Feinstein MB, Burkhalter JE, Park BJ, Ostroff JS. Impact of symptom burden in post-surgical non-small cell lung cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2014 Jan;22(1):173-80. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1968-3. Epub 2013 Sep 10.
PMID: 24018910BACKGROUNDVijayvergia N, Shah PC, Denlinger CS. Survivorship in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Challenges Faced and Steps Forward. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2015 Sep;13(9):1151-61. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2015.0140.
PMID: 26358799BACKGROUNDCooley ME, Finn KT, Wang Q, Roper K, Morones S, Shi L, Litrownik D, Marcoux JP, Zaner K, Hayman LL. Health behaviors, readiness to change, and interest in health promotion programs among smokers with lung cancer and their family members: a pilot study. Cancer Nurs. 2013 Mar-Apr;36(2):145-54. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e31825e4359.
PMID: 22791213BACKGROUNDMcDonnell KK, Owens OL, Hilfinger Messias DK, Heiney SP, Friedman DB, Campbell C, Webb LA. Health behavior changes in African American family members facing lung cancer: Tensions and compromises. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2019 Feb;38:57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2018.12.002. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
PMID: 30717937BACKGROUNDRoddy MK, Flores RM, Burt B, Badr H. Lifestyle behaviors and intervention preferences of early-stage lung cancer survivors and their family caregivers. Support Care Cancer. 2021 Mar;29(3):1465-1475. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05632-5. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
PMID: 32691229BACKGROUNDNightingale CL, Steffen LE, Tooze JA, Petty W, Danhauer SC, Badr H, Weaver KE. Lung Cancer Patient and Caregiver Health Vulnerabilities and Interest in Health Promotion Interventions: An Exploratory Study. Glob Adv Health Med. 2019 Jul 17;8:2164956119865160. doi: 10.1177/2164956119865160. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31360617BACKGROUNDMatulewicz RS, Sherman S, Bjurlin MA. Smoking Cessation and Cancer Survivorship. JAMA. 2020 Oct 13;324(14):1475. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.16277. No abstract available.
PMID: 33048156BACKGROUNDGranger CL, McDonald CF, Berney S, Chao C, Denehy L. Exercise intervention to improve exercise capacity and health related quality of life for patients with Non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review. Lung Cancer. 2011 May;72(2):139-53. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.01.006. Epub 2011 Feb 12.
PMID: 21316790BACKGROUNDHoffman AJ, Brintnall RA, Brown JK, Eye Av, Jones LW, Alderink G, Ritz-Holland D, Enter M, Patzelt LH, Vanotteren GM. Too sick not to exercise: using a 6-week, home-based exercise intervention for cancer-related fatigue self-management for postsurgical non-small cell lung cancer patients. Cancer Nurs. 2013 May-Jun;36(3):175-88. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e31826c7763.
PMID: 23051872BACKGROUNDJones LW, Alfano CM. Exercise-oncology research: past, present, and future. Acta Oncol. 2013 Feb;52(2):195-215. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2012.742564. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
PMID: 23244677BACKGROUNDParamanandam VS, Dunn V. Exercise for the management of cancer-related fatigue in lung cancer: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2015;24(1):4-14. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12198. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
PMID: 24720528BACKGROUNDMosher CE, Jaynes HA, Hanna N, Ostroff JS. Distressed family caregivers of lung cancer patients: an examination of psychosocial and practical challenges. Support Care Cancer. 2013 Feb;21(2):431-7. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1532-6. Epub 2012 Jul 14.
PMID: 22797839BACKGROUNDMosher CE, Bakas T, Champion VL. Physical health, mental health, and life changes among family caregivers of patients with lung cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2013 Jan;40(1):53-61. doi: 10.1188/13.ONF.53-61.
PMID: 23269770BACKGROUNDSiminoff LA, Wilson-Genderson M, Baker S Jr. Depressive symptoms in lung cancer patients and their family caregivers and the influence of family environment. Psychooncology. 2010 Dec;19(12):1285-93. doi: 10.1002/pon.1696.
PMID: 20119935BACKGROUNDMcDonnell KK, Owens OL, Hilfinger Messias DK, Friedman DB, Newsome BR, Campbell King C, Jenerette C, Webb LA. After Ringing the Bell: Receptivity of and Preferences for Healthy Behaviors in African American Dyads Surviving Lung Cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2020 May 1;47(3):281-291. doi: 10.1188/20.ONF.281-291.
PMID: 32301934BACKGROUNDWennman-Larsen A, Persson C, Ostlund U, Wengstrom Y, Gustavsson JP. Development in quality of relationship between the significant other and the lung cancer patient as perceived by the significant other. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2008 Dec;12(5):430-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2008.07.004. Epub 2008 Oct 8.
PMID: 18845476BACKGROUNDBadr H, Taylor CL. Effects of relationship maintenance on psychological distress and dyadic adjustment among couples coping with lung cancer. Health Psychol. 2008 Sep;27(5):616-27. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.27.5.616.
PMID: 18823188BACKGROUNDBadr H, Krebs P. A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for couples coping with cancer. Psychooncology. 2013 Aug;22(8):1688-704. doi: 10.1002/pon.3200. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
PMID: 23045191BACKGROUNDRyan P, Sawin KJ. The Individual and Family Self-Management Theory: background and perspectives on context, process, and outcomes. Nurs Outlook. 2009 Jul-Aug;57(4):217-225.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2008.10.004.
PMID: 19631064BACKGROUNDChodosh J, Morton SC, Mojica W, Maglione M, Suttorp MJ, Hilton L, Rhodes S, Shekelle P. Meta-analysis: chronic disease self-management programs for older adults. Ann Intern Med. 2005 Sep 20;143(6):427-38. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-143-6-200509200-00007.
PMID: 16172441BACKGROUNDNational Cancer Institute. (2014). Facing forward: Life after cancer treatment. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health.
BACKGROUNDNational Coalition of Cancer Survivorship, UCLA Cancer Survivorship Center, Oncology Nursing Society, Anthem Inc., & Genentech. (2015). Journey forward. Retrieved from http://www.journeyforward.org/about-journey-forward
BACKGROUNDBrandon TH, Simmons VN, Sutton SK, Unrod M, Harrell PT, Meade CD, Craig BM, Lee JH, Meltzer LR. Extended Self-Help for Smoking Cessation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Prev Med. 2016 Jul;51(1):54-62. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.12.016. Epub 2016 Feb 8.
PMID: 26868284BACKGROUNDPinto BM, Frierson GM, Rabin C, Trunzo JJ, Marcus BH. Home-based physical activity intervention for breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2005 May 20;23(15):3577-87. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.080.
PMID: 15908668BACKGROUNDKolt GS, Schofield GM, Kerse N, Garrett N, Ashton T, Patel A. Healthy Steps trial: pedometer-based advice and physical activity for low-active older adults. Ann Fam Med. 2012 May-Jun;10(3):206-12. doi: 10.1370/afm.1345.
PMID: 22585884BACKGROUNDVan Remoortel H, Giavedoni S, Raste Y, Burtin C, Louvaris Z, Gimeno-Santos E, Langer D, Glendenning A, Hopkinson NS, Vogiatzis I, Peterson BT, Wilson F, Mann B, Rabinovich R, Puhan MA, Troosters T; PROactive consortium. Validity of activity monitors in health and chronic disease: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Jul 9;9:84. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-84.
PMID: 22776399BACKGROUNDLehto RH, Wyatt G. Perceptions about using mindfulness therapy: a lung cancer focus group study. Cancer Nurs. 2013 Jul-Aug;36(4):E51-60. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e31826d2f16.
PMID: 23047802BACKGROUNDShennan C, Payne S, Fenlon D. What is the evidence for the use of mindfulness-based interventions in cancer care? A review. Psychooncology. 2011 Jul;20(7):681-97. doi: 10.1002/pon.1819. Epub 2010 Aug 4.
PMID: 20690112BACKGROUNDHately J, Laurence V, Scott A, Baker R, Thomas P. Breathlessness clinics within specialist palliative care settings can improve the quality of life and functional capacity of patients with lung cancer. Palliat Med. 2003 Jul;17(5):410-7. doi: 10.1191/0269216303pm752oa.
PMID: 12882259BACKGROUNDBonk AK. Management of dyspnea in a patient with lung cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2012 May 1;39(3):257-60. doi: 10.1188/12.ONF.257-260. No abstract available.
PMID: 22543384BACKGROUNDFiore, M. C., Jaén, C. R., Baker, T. B., Bailey, W. C., Benowitz, N. L., Curry, S. J., . . . Wewers, M. E. (2008). Clinical Practice Guideline: Treating tobacco use and dependence; 2008 update. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service.
BACKGROUNDMcDonnell KK, Bullock LF, Kozower BD, Hollen PJ, Heath J, Rovnyak V. A decision aid to improve smoking abstinence for families facing cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2014 Nov 1;41(6):649-58. doi: 10.1188/14.ONF.649-658.
PMID: 25355020BACKGROUNDMcDonnell KK, Gallerani DG, Newsome BR, Owens OL, Beer J, Myren-Bennett AR, Regan E, Hardin JW, Webb LA. A Prospective Pilot Study Evaluating Feasibility and Preliminary Effects of Breathe Easier: A Mindfulness-based Intervention for Survivors of Lung Cancer and Their Family Members (Dyads). Integr Cancer Ther. 2020 Jan-Dec;19:1534735420969829. doi: 10.1177/1534735420969829.
PMID: 33118443BACKGROUNDCharlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8.
PMID: 3558716BACKGROUNDBirim O, Maat AP, Kappetein AP, van Meerbeeck JP, Damhuis RA, Bogers AJ. Validation of the Charlson comorbidity index in patients with operated primary non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003 Jan;23(1):30-4. doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(02)00721-2.
PMID: 12493500BACKGROUNDCreamer M, Bell R, Failla S. Psychometric properties of the Impact of Event Scale - Revised. Behav Res Ther. 2003 Dec;41(12):1489-96. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2003.07.010.
PMID: 14705607BACKGROUNDDibble JL, Levine TR, Park HS. The Unidimensional Relationship Closeness Scale (URCS): reliability and validity evidence for a new measure of relationship closeness. Psychol Assess. 2012 Sep;24(3):565-72. doi: 10.1037/a0026265. Epub 2011 Nov 14.
PMID: 22082035BACKGROUNDHughes JR, Keely JP, Niaura RS, Ossip-Klein DJ, Richmond RL, Swan GE. Measures of abstinence in clinical trials: issues and recommendations. Nicotine Tob Res. 2003 Feb;5(1):13-25.
PMID: 12745503BACKGROUNDMurray RP, Connett JE, Lauger GG, Voelker HT. Error in smoking measures: effects of intervention on relations of cotinine and carbon monoxide to self-reported smoking. The Lung Health Study Research Group. Am J Public Health. 1993 Sep;83(9):1251-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.83.9.1251.
PMID: 8363000BACKGROUNDHeatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerstrom KO. The Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire. Br J Addict. 1991 Sep;86(9):1119-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01879.x.
PMID: 1932883BACKGROUNDMarcus BH, Selby VC, Niaura RS, Rossi JS. Self-efficacy and the stages of exercise behavior change. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1992 Mar;63(1):60-6. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1992.10607557.
PMID: 1574662BACKGROUNDVelicer WF, Diclemente CC, Rossi JS, Prochaska JO. Relapse situations and self-efficacy: an integrative model. Addict Behav. 1990;15(3):271-83. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(90)90070-e.
PMID: 2378287BACKGROUNDZimet GD, Powell SS, Farley GK, Werkman S, Berkoff KA. Psychometric characteristics of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. J Pers Assess. 1990 Winter;55(3-4):610-7. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674095.
PMID: 2280326BACKGROUNDKendzierski, D., & DeCarlo, K. J. (1991). Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale: Two validation studies. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 13(1), 50-64.
BACKGROUNDCohen S, Lichtenstein E. Partner behaviors that support quitting smoking. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1990 Jun;58(3):304-9. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.58.3.304.
PMID: 2365893BACKGROUNDProchaska JO, Velicer WF, DiClemente CC, Fava J. Measuring processes of change: applications to the cessation of smoking. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988 Aug;56(4):520-8. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.56.4.520. No abstract available.
PMID: 3198809BACKGROUNDEnright PL. The six-minute walk test. Respir Care. 2003 Aug;48(8):783-5.
PMID: 12890299BACKGROUNDChoi SW, Victorson DE, Yount S, Anton S, Cella D. Development of a conceptual framework and calibrated item banks to measure patient-reported dyspnea severity and related functional limitations. Value Health. 2011 Mar-Apr;14(2):291-306. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.06.001.
PMID: 21402297BACKGROUNDStenton C. The MRC breathlessness scale. Occup Med (Lond). 2008 May;58(3):226-7. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqm162. No abstract available.
PMID: 18441368BACKGROUNDCella D, Lai JS, Chang CH, Peterman A, Slavin M. Fatigue in cancer patients compared with fatigue in the general United States population. Cancer. 2002 Jan 15;94(2):528-38. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10245.
PMID: 11900238BACKGROUNDYellen SB, Cella DF, Webster K, Blendowski C, Kaplan E. Measuring fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) measurement system. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1997 Feb;13(2):63-74. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(96)00274-6.
PMID: 9095563BACKGROUNDZigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.
PMID: 6880820BACKGROUNDRoberti, J. W., Harrington, L. N., & Storch, E. A. (2006). Further psychometric support for the 10-item version of the Perceived Stress Scale. Journal of College Counseling, 9(2), 135-147. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1882.2006.tb00100.x
BACKGROUNDDavenport TE, Stevens SR, Baroni K, Van Ness JM, Snell CR. Reliability and validity of Short Form 36 Version 2 to measure health perceptions in a sub-group of individuals with fatigue. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(25-26):2596-604. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2011.582925. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
PMID: 21682669BACKGROUNDKampshoff CS, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, van Oijen MG, Sprangers MA, Buffart LM. Ecological momentary assessments among patients with cancer: A scoping review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2019 May;28(3):e13095. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13095. Epub 2019 May 14.
PMID: 31090160BACKGROUNDBuysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193-213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4.
PMID: 2748771BACKGROUNDNorweg A, Ni P, Garshick E, O'Connor G, Wilke K, Jette AM. A multidimensional computer adaptive test approach to dyspnea assessment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Oct;92(10):1561-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.05.020.
PMID: 21963123BACKGROUNDThompson, E. R. (2007). Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(2), 227-242.
BACKGROUNDCalhoun EA, Welshman EE, Chang CH, Lurain JR, Fishman DA, Hunt TL, Cella D. Psychometric evaluation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (Fact/GOG-Ntx) questionnaire for patients receiving systemic chemotherapy. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2003 Nov-Dec;13(6):741-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2003.13603.x.
PMID: 14675309BACKGROUNDRosenberg DE, Norman GJ, Wagner N, Patrick K, Calfas KJ, Sallis JF. Reliability and validity of the Sedentary Behavior Questionnaire (SBQ) for adults. J Phys Act Health. 2010 Nov;7(6):697-705. doi: 10.1123/jpah.7.6.697.
PMID: 21088299BACKGROUNDValentine TR, Weiss DM, Jones JA, Andersen BL. Construct validity of PROMIS(R) Cognitive Function in cancer patients and noncancer controls. Health Psychol. 2019 May;38(5):351-358. doi: 10.1037/hea0000693.
PMID: 31045417BACKGROUNDCessna JM, Jim HS, Sutton SK, Asvat Y, Small BJ, Salsman JM, Zachariah B, Fishman M, Field T, Fernandez H, Perez L, Jacobsen PB. Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the PROMIS Cancer Fatigue Short Form with cancer patients. J Psychosom Res. 2016 Feb;81:9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.12.002. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
PMID: 26800633BACKGROUNDMotzer SA, Moseley JR, Lewis FM. Recruitment and retention of families in clinical trials with longitudinal designs. West J Nurs Res. 1997 Jun;19(3):314-33. doi: 10.1177/019394599701900304.
PMID: 9170990BACKGROUNDNorthouse LL, Rosset T, Phillips L, Mood D, Schafenacker A, Kershaw T. Research with families facing cancer: the challenges of accrual and retention. Res Nurs Health. 2006 Jun;29(3):199-211. doi: 10.1002/nur.20128.
PMID: 16676337BACKGROUNDAbshire DA, McDonnell KK, Donevant SB, Corbett CF, Tavakoli AS, Felder TM, Pinto BM. Pivoting Nursing Research and Scholarship During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Nurs Res. 2021 May-Jun 01;70(3):165-172. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000493.
PMID: 33315760BACKGROUNDKenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
BACKGROUNDLiang, K. Zeger, S. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrics, 1986, 73(1), 12.
BACKGROUNDZeger SL, Liang KY. Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. Biometrics. 1986 Mar;42(1):121-30.
PMID: 3719049BACKGROUNDR Development Core Team. (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org
BACKGROUNDKraemer HC, Mintz J, Noda A, Tinklenberg J, Yesavage JA. Caution regarding the use of pilot studies to guide power calculations for study proposals. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 May;63(5):484-9. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.5.484.
PMID: 16651505BACKGROUNDLeon AC, Davis LL, Kraemer HC. The role and interpretation of pilot studies in clinical research. J Psychiatr Res. 2011 May;45(5):626-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.10.008. Epub 2010 Oct 28.
PMID: 21035130BACKGROUNDMcDonnell KK, Andrews JO, Yang CH, Newsome BR, Weinkle E, Davis JE, Dunsiger S. Study Protocol for the Breathe Easier Trial: A Pilot RCT of a Dyad-Based, Multiple-Behavior Intervention for Improving Physical and Emotional Health in Survivors Facing Lung Cancer. Integr Cancer Ther. 2023 Jan-Dec;22:15347354231212876. doi: 10.1177/15347354231212876.
PMID: 38009546DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Karen K McDonnell, PhD
University of South Carolina
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- One staff person who is the outcome assessor will be blinded to group assignment.
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 19, 2023
First Posted
July 21, 2023
Study Start
June 15, 2022
Primary Completion
April 30, 2024
Study Completion
April 30, 2024
Last Updated
May 8, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- Protocol will be submitted for publication in 2024. Data will be shared post statistical analysis by publication in open access journal.
- Access Criteria
- Undecided
On request