NCT05956184

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the pain score between the direct method and the conventional method in patients who have undergone copper or hormonal intrauterine devices (IUD) for contraception and to find an answer to the question of which method is better.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
128

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jul 2023

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 13, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

July 13, 2023

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 21, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

September 5, 2023

Status Verified

September 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

July 13, 2023

Last Update Submit

September 1, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

PainIntrauterine DevicesConventional TechniqueDirect TechniqueIUD

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    This is a numeric pain score evaluated as "painless" (score=0) and "worst pain" (score=10). Score \<3 mild pain, 3-6 mild-moderate pain, and \>6 moderate-to-severe pain.

    Thirty minutes

Study Arms (2)

Convention Method Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Women who have an IUD inserted by conventional method will be asked to rate the most severe pain they experience during the procedure according to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (from 0 to 10).

Device: Intrauterine Device Insertion

Direct Method Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Women who have an IUD inserted by direct method will be asked to rate the most severe pain they experience during the procedure according to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (from 0 to 10).

Device: Intrauterine Device Insertion

Interventions

All womens will be placed in a gynecological position and underwent a bimanual examination to better determine whether the uterus was in the anteverted or retroverted position. Subsequently, a speculum will be inserted, and the cervix will be disinfected with betadine. In the conventional method: the anterior lip of the cervix is grasped and pulled with Pozzi forceps, and after entering the uterine cavity with a hysterometry the IUD is inserted. In the direct method: the anterior lip of the cervix is grasped and pulled with Pozzi forceps, and without using hysterometry the IUD is directly inserted. The strings will be cut approximately 2-3 cm after the cervix, and the Pozzi forceps and speculum will be removed. The accuracy of the IUD placement will be confirmed using pelvic ultrasound. The process will take about five minutes.

Convention Method GroupDirect Method Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 45 Years
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Gender Eligibility DetailsWomen using an intrauterine device as a birth control method
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Volunteer to participate in the study
  • Preferring an intrauterine device for the contraceptive method

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with uterine leiomyoma
  • Patients with endometriosis
  • Patients with chronic pelvic pain
  • Patients with familial mediterranean fever
  • Patients who experienced complications during the procedure
  • Patients who developed vasovagal reactions
  • Patients who had previously used an IUD for any reason
  • Patients with uterine anomalies

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ankara City Hospital

Ankara, Çankaya, 06800, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Halilzade MI, Halilzade I, Turgay B, Kilickiran H, Turkmen O, Ozaksit MG. Effect of uterine sound on pain perception during intrauterine device insertion: A randomized trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Aug 1;104(31):e43721. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043721.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Intrauterine Device MigrationPain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Foreign-Body MigrationForeign BodiesWounds and InjuriesNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Mohammad I Halilzade, M.D.

    Ankara City Hospital Bilkent

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
The participants will not know which method would be applied to them.
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Two groups as conventional method and direct method
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Doctor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 13, 2023

First Posted

July 21, 2023

Study Start

July 13, 2023

Primary Completion

September 1, 2023

Study Completion

September 1, 2023

Last Updated

September 5, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations