NCT05954806

Brief Summary

Several controversies exist in Hypnale bite management in Kerala. Even though leading bodies like WHO recommend against using antivenom for hypnale bites, many physicians still administer antivenom for snakebites even when the culprit snake is identified. Anecdotal experience suggests that the reasons for doing so range from lack of confidence in the identification of the snake, confusion as to whether or not to approach it syndromically and symptomatically rather than relying on the species identification, doubts as to whether there exists para-specific neutralization capability for the available polyvalent antivenom and fear of medicolegal culpability in denying antivenom in a case of 'snake envenomation'. To date, these domains and rationale have not been studied. It is also to be kept in mind that the evidence behind the WHO recommendation against the use of antivenom in Hypnale is based on expert opinion and case reports. The investigators intend to compare clinical manifestation and outcome amongst Hypnale hypnale bite patients who received the polyvalent antivenom to those who did not. The investigators also intend to describe the clinical and laboratorical profile of patients with Hypnale hypnale envenomation .

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
41

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2022

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 12, 2022

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 12, 2022

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 12, 2022

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 16, 2023

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 20, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

July 20, 2023

Status Verified

July 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

June 16, 2023

Last Update Submit

July 13, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

Hump-nosed pit viperanti venom

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Mortality among patients administered antivenom compared to those who did not received the antivenom

    Mortality among patients administered antivenom compared to those who did not received the antivenom for local or systemic signs of envenomation

    3 months

  • Morbidity among patients administered antivenom compared to those who did not received the antivenom

    Morbidity among patients administered antivenom compared to those who did not received the antivenom for local or systemic signs of envenomation

    3 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Clinical profile of patients with Hypnale hypnale envenomation

    3 months

  • Laboratorical profile of patients with Hypnale hypnale envenomation

    3 months

Study Arms (2)

Patients With Hypnale Hypnale Bite receiving Antivenom

Patients With Hypnale Hypnale Bite receiving Antivenom for local or systemic signs of envenomation

Drug: Antivenom Snakes

Patients With Hypnale Hypnale Bite not receiving Antivenom

Patients With Hypnale Hypnale Bite not receiving Antivenom for local or systemic signs of envenomation

Interventions

No specific antivenom exists for a bite by Hypnale hypnale yet most patients are treated with non-specific antivenoms, risking reactions without hope of benefit. In this study we compare patients With Hypnale Hypnale Bite receiving Antivenom vrs patients With Hypnale Hypnale Bite not receiving Antivenom.

Also known as: The polyvalent f(ab')2 antibody
Patients With Hypnale Hypnale Bite receiving Antivenom

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients with Hypnale hypnale bite that were treated at a tertiary care centre in central Kerala, India during the period from April 2017 to December 2021.

You may qualify if:

  • Case records of all snakebite in which the specimen brought is identified as Hump-nosed pit viper (Hypnale hypnale)

You may not qualify if:

  • Incomplete case records from which no meaningful data can be abstracted.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute

Thrissur, Kerala, 680005, India

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Snake Bites

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Bites and StingsPoisoningChemically-Induced DisordersWounds and Injuries

Study Officials

  • Siju V Abraham, MD

    Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE CONTROL
Time Perspective
OTHER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 16, 2023

First Posted

July 20, 2023

Study Start

March 12, 2022

Primary Completion

June 12, 2022

Study Completion

September 12, 2022

Last Updated

July 20, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-07

Locations