Effect of tACS on the Recovery of Motor Control of the Upper Limb and Cerebral Connectivity in Chronic Stroke Patients
tACS
Effect of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation on the Recovery of Motor Control of the Upper Limb and Cerebral Connectivity in Chronic-stage Stroke Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
59
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This project seeks to evaluate the effect of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on the recovery of motor control of the upper limb and associated neuronal synchrony during a 14-sessions (5-week) rehabilitation program for adult patients with diagnosis of stroke at chronic stage. Specifically, the stimulation on Gamma ranges, because the evidence available so far allows us to propose that the tACS in the Gamma range (around 70 Hz) facilitates motor execution. For this purpose, the experimental approach involves active (70 Hz in Gamma rhythm and 7 Hz, Theta rhythm) and sham tACS together with an analytical and integrated motor training with a double-blind and randomized design. Our hypothesis is that Gamma frequency tACS restores neuronal synchrony in Beta range, which enhances the upper limb motor recovery associated with a training program. Using specific motor control parameters, clinical scales and electroencephalography, the immediate and long-term (3 months after finished the training) behavioral and neurophysiological effect of this new neurostimulation paradigm (tACS plus training) for motor rehabilitation of stroke will be established.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started May 2023
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 2, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 12, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 17, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 7, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 7, 2025
CompletedApril 29, 2025
April 1, 2025
1.9 years
June 12, 2023
April 24, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Impairment Measure pre-intervention: Upper Extremity Fugl Meyer
Scale use to assess motor impairments (ICF function level), and adequately reflects the analytical motor control of force and direction of movement. The scale has a maximum of 66 points, which indicates a normal performance. Lower scores indicate worse performance.
week 0
Change of Impairment Measure post-intervention: Upper Extremity Fugl Meyer
Scale use to assess motor impairments (ICF function level), and adequately reflects the analytical motor control of force and direction of movement. The scale has a maximum of 66 points, which indicates a normal performance. Lower scores indicate worse performance.
week 5 or 6 (end of the training program)
Change of Impairment Measure follow up: Upper Extremity Fugl Meyer
Scale use to assess motor impairments (ICF function level), and adequately reflects the analytical motor control of force and direction of movement. The scale has a maximum of 66 points, which indicates a normal performance. Lower scores indicate worse performance.
week 12
EEG spectral power in Beta band pre-intervention
Change in spectral power in the Beta band (13-30Hz) associated with motor performance in kinetic and kinematic tasks
week 0
Change in EEG spectral power in Beta band post-intervention
Change in spectral power in the Beta band (13-30Hz) associated with motor performance in kinetic and kinematic tasks
week 5 or 6 (end of the training program)
Change in EEG spectral power in Beta band follow up
Change in spectral power in the Beta band (13-30Hz) associated with motor performance in kinetic and kinematic tasks
week 12
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Activity Measure: Action Research Arm Test
week 0, week 5 or 6 (end of the training program) and week 12
Change in Activity Measure post-intervention: Action Research Arm Test
week 5 or 6 (end of the training program)
Change in Activity Measure follow up: Action Research Arm Test
week 12
Performance measure in the trained kinetic task (behavioral parameter)
week 0, week 5 or 6 (end of the training program) and week 12
Change in the performance measure in the trained kinetic task post-intertenvion (behavioral parameter)
week 5 or 6 (end of the training program)
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
tACS - 70 Hz group
EXPERIMENTALThe group will receive the training program plus 20 minutes of tACS at 70 Hz in the C3 or C4 electrode position (depending of the hemiparetic arm) during a specific kinetic and kinematic tasks in every training session.
tACS - 7 Hz group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe group will receive the training program plus 20 minutes of tACS at 7 Hz in the C3 or C4 electrode position (depending of the hemiparetic arm) during a specific kinetic and kinematic tasks in every training session.
tACS - sham group
SHAM COMPARATORThe group will receive the training program plus 30 seconds of tACS at 70 Hz in the C3 or C4 electrode position (depending of the hemiparetic arm) in every training session.
Interventions
Transcranial alternating current stimulation in the head above the motor cortex area of one side of the brain, according to the hemiparesis side. Electrodes with 3.14 cm2 of stimulation area will be used, therefore, the initial current intensity will be 0.21 mA, with a current density of 0.07 mA / cm2. The current intensity will be adjusted to the tactile sensory threshold and phosphenes of each patient, with in order to reduce such sensory effects, but considering that the decrease in current will not be greater than 10% of the initial intensity, in order to obtain a comparable configuration between subjects. The frequency stimulation will be 70 Hz
Training of the upper limb with specific kinematic and kinetic tasks plus functional training
Transcranial alternating current stimulation in the head above the motor cortex area of one side of the brain, according to the hemiparesis side. Electrodes with 3.14 cm2 of stimulation area will be used, therefore, the initial current intensity will be 0.21 mA, with a current density of 0.07 mA / cm2. The current intensity will be adjusted to the tactile sensory threshold and phosphenes of each patient, with in order to reduce such sensory effects, but considering that the decrease in current will not be greater than 10% of the initial intensity, in order to obtain a comparable configuration between subjects. The frequency stimulation will be 7 Hz
Transcranial alternating current stimulation in the head above the motor cortex area of one side of the brain, according to the hemiparesis side. Electrodes with 3.14 cm2 of stimulation area will be used, therefore, the initial current intensity will be 0.21 mA, with a current density of 0.07 mA / cm2. The current intensity will be adjusted to the tactile sensory threshold and phosphenes of each patient, with in order to reduce such sensory effects, but considering that the decrease in current will not be greater than 10% of the initial intensity, in order to obtain a comparable configuration between subjects. The stimulation will be turn on for 30 seconds (at 70 Hz)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of unilateral stroke at chronic stage (6 months or more)
- Upper Extremity -Fugl Meyer \> 10
- Wrist extensors strength of the paretic limb of 2 or more in the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale
- Active shoulder movement (flexion or abduction) of 30º or more
- Be able to follow the instructions necessary to achieve the training protocol
You may not qualify if:
- Have a cerebellar stroke or ataxia
- Have some medical condition contraindicated for tACS (epilepsy, pacemaker, prosthesis between others)
- Have post-stroke epilepsy
- Limited passive range of motion in the elbow (less than 45º in flexo-extension plane)
- Limited passive range of motion in the wrist (less than 40º in flexo-extension plane)
- Limited passive range of motion in the shoulder (less than 70º in flexo-extension plane)
- Have another neurological condition that leads to upper extremity sequelae
- Have a normal performance in the clinical test
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Centro de Habilidades Clínicas - Universidad Metropolitana de Ciencias de la Educación
Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, 7780450, Chile
Related Publications (1)
Alisar DC, Ozen S, Sozay S. Effects of Bihemispheric Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Upper Extremity Function in Stroke Patients: A randomized Double-Blind Sham-Controlled Study. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020 Jan;29(1):104454. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.104454. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
PMID: 31699572BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Juan J Mariman, Ph.D
Universidad Metropolitana de Ciencias de la Educacion
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Neither the participant or the professionals that will make the training and the assessments will know to which group the participants was assigned.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Full professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 12, 2023
First Posted
July 17, 2023
Study Start
May 2, 2023
Primary Completion
April 7, 2025
Study Completion
April 7, 2025
Last Updated
April 29, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
For now, we have no plans of sharing individual participant data.