Comparison of UESCOPE VL 400, I-VIEW, Airtraq for Tracheal Intubation in Simulated Out-of-Hospital Conditions
1 other identifier
observational
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In the study, three videolaryngoscopes: UESCOPE VL 400 (Zhejiang UE Medical Corp. Zhejiang, China), I-View™ VL (Intersurgical Ltd, Wokingham, Berkshire, UK), Airtraq sp® (Prodol Meditec S.A, Vizcaya, Spain) were compared with the most widely used, classic Macintosh laryngoscope (HEINE Optotechnik GmbH \& Co. KG, Gilch-ing, Germany) under simulated out-of-hospital conditions by people without clinical experience on a manikin model (Laerdal Airway Management Trainer Stavanger Norway manikin of universal difficulty), while using an endotracheal tube without and with a stylet. Simulated out-of-hospital conditions were created by placing the manikin at floor level. A random selection of 30 students of the third year of Emergency Medicine, full-time first-degree program at the Medical University of Lodz, Poland, were enrolled in the study. The following were assessed: intubation efficiency, time to ventilation (primary endpoints); intubation effort, intubator comfort, tooth damage and visibility of the glottis according to the Cormack-Lehane scale (secondary endpoints).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Jan 2022
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 16, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 14, 2023
CompletedJuly 14, 2023
July 1, 2023
11 months
June 16, 2023
July 13, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
time to ventilation
time from grabbing the laryngoscope to confirmed intubation measured in sec
during the procedure
intubation efficacy
endotracheal intubation confirmed by ventilation of manikin's lungs, measured yes/no
during the procedure
Secondary Outcomes (4)
intubation effort
during the procedure
intubator comfort,
during the procedure
tooth damage
during the procedure
visibility of the glottis according to the Cormack-Lehane scale
during the procedure
Study Arms (1)
students
30 students of the third year of Emergency Medicine, full-time first-degree program at the Medical University of Lodz, Poland, were enrolled in the study.
Interventions
Evaluation of 3 videolaryngoscopes under simulated out-of-hospital conditions by people without clinical experience on a manikin model
Eligibility Criteria
intubation effort, intubator comfort, tooth damage and visibility of the glottis according to the Cormack-Lehane scale
You may qualify if:
- attaneding students
You may not qualify if:
- lack of conscent to participate
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Medical University of Lodz, Poland
Lodz, 90-153, Poland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tomasz Gaszynski, Prof
Medical University of Lodz, Poland
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CROSSOVER
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- prof. dr hab.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 16, 2023
First Posted
July 14, 2023
Study Start
January 1, 2022
Primary Completion
December 1, 2022
Study Completion
February 1, 2023
Last Updated
July 14, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-07