Clinical Utility to Follow-up Radiographs During the First Year of Knee Replacement Surgery
Prospective Randomized Study of the Clinical Utility to Follow-up Radiographs During the First Year of Knee Replacement Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Primary prosthetic surgery for the treatment of gonarthrosis is currently one of the most prevalent surgical treatments in Traumatology. The Arthroplasty Register in Catalonia, which started in 2005, counted more than 60.000 knee prothesis until 2015. Regarding the peridiocity for taking control radiographs in patients undergoing knee replacement surgery, there is no consensus. This means, that in similar studies that evaluate the results of prosthetic surgery, there is a great variability in radiological follow-up protocols, especifically during the firts post-operative years. Given the high prevalence and the long survival period demonstrated by these implants, it seems reasonable to be able to establish the real value of the radiographs performed during the first year of follow-up after surgery. From this perspective, the aim of our study is to evaluate if conducting just two radiographs instead of five during the first postoperative year after the surgery, has any influence on the clinical and functional results of our patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 20, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 27, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 13, 2023
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2024
CompletedAugust 14, 2024
August 1, 2024
2.4 years
June 27, 2023
August 13, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
KSS Test change
Change value from preoperative condition to 12 months after operation, including 6 month assessment
Preoperative, 6 and 12 months
KOOS Test change
Change value from preoperative condition to 12 months after operation, including 6 month assessment
Preoperative, 6 and 12 months
SF-12 Test change
Change value from preoperative condition to 12 months after operation, including 6 month assessment
Preoperative, 6 and 12 months
Study Arms (2)
Group Xray
PLACEBO COMPARATORXray at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months
Group No Xray
ACTIVE COMPARATORXray at 12 months
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients who voluntarily agree to be part of the study and sign the informed consent
- Patients awaiting prosthetic knee surgery with a diagnosis of gonarthrosis without age limit (\>18 years)
- All cases of prothesis cemented to the tibia and femur will be included, regardless of whether or not the patellar component is prosthetic
- Patients with knee prothesis and cruciate ligament retention, with ultracongruent polyethylene or posterostabilized as a maximum degree of prosthetic constriction
- The implants will be the usual ones used in our Center for primary prosthetic knee surgery, Journey (smith-Nephew) and Persona or NexGen (Zimmer)
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who do not voluntariily agree to participate
- Patients undergoing primary prosthetic surgery in relation to tibial plate fractures
- Patients awaiting a unicompartimental or patellofemoral prothesis
- Patients who, for any reason, want to leave the study during the follow-up period
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Parc taulĂ
Sabadell, Barcelona, 08208, Spain
Related Publications (17)
Evans JT, Walker RW, Evans JP, Blom AW, Sayers A, Whitehouse MR. How long does a knee replacement last? A systematic review and meta-analysis of case series and national registry reports with more than 15 years of follow-up. Lancet. 2019 Feb 16;393(10172):655-663. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32531-5. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
PMID: 30782341BACKGROUNDGomez-Valero S, Garcia-Perez F, Florez-Garcia MT, Miangolarra-Page JC. A systematic review of self-administered questionnaires for the functional assessment of patients with knee disabilities adapted into Spanish. Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2017 Mar-Apr;61(2):96-103. doi: 10.1016/j.recot.2016.11.002. Epub 2017 Jan 31. English, Spanish.
PMID: 28159566BACKGROUNDWalker LC, Clement ND, Bardgett M, Weir D, Holland J, Gerrand C, Deehan DJ. The WOMAC score can be reliably used to classify patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Nov;26(11):3333-3341. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-4879-5. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
PMID: 29484445BACKGROUNDRoos EM, Toksvig-Larsen S. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - validation and comparison to the WOMAC in total knee replacement. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 May 25;1:17. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-17.
PMID: 12801417BACKGROUNDMeneghini RM, Mont MA, Backstein DB, Bourne RB, Dennis DA, Scuderi GR. Development of a Modern Knee Society Radiographic Evaluation System and Methodology for Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Dec;30(12):2311-4. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.05.049. Epub 2015 May 29.
PMID: 26122112BACKGROUNDRissolio L, Sabatini L, Risitano S, Bistolfi A, Galluzzo U, Masse A, Indelli PF. Is It the Surgeon, the Patient, or the Device? A Comprehensive Clinical and Radiological Evaluation of Factors Influencing Patient Satisfaction in 648 Total Knee Arthroplasties. J Clin Med. 2021 Jun 12;10(12):2599. doi: 10.3390/jcm10122599.
PMID: 34204628BACKGROUNDSarmah SS, Patel S, Hossain FS, Haddad FS. The radiological assessment of total and unicompartmental knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Oct;94(10):1321-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B10.29411.
PMID: 23015555BACKGROUNDEwald FC. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989 Nov;(248):9-12.
PMID: 2805502BACKGROUNDKhalifa AA, Mullaji AB, Mostafa AM, Farouk OA. A Protocol to Systematic Radiographic Assessment of Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty. Orthop Res Rev. 2021 Jul 17;13:95-106. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S320372. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34305412BACKGROUNDBaek JH, Lee SC, Choi K, Ahn HS, Nam CH. Long-term survivorship of total knee arthroplasty with a single-radius, high-flexion posterior stabilized prosthesis. Knee. 2021 Jun;30:275-282. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2021.04.017. Epub 2021 May 11.
PMID: 33984746BACKGROUNDMiralles-Munoz FA, Rubio-Morales M, Bello-Tejada L, Gonzalez-Parreno S, Lizaur-Utrilla A, Alonso-Montero C. Varus alignment of the tibial component up to seven degrees is not associated with poor long-term outcomes in a neutrally aligned total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Aug;30(8):2768-2775. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06627-3. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
PMID: 34175990BACKGROUNDSabatini L, Aprato A, Camazzola D, Bistolfi A, Capella M, Masse A. Primary total knee arthroplasty in tibial plateau fractures: Literature review and our institutional experience. Injury. 2023 Mar;54 Suppl 1:S15-S23. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.02.006. Epub 2021 Feb 7.
PMID: 33583591BACKGROUNDWebb JI, Stoner RS, Afzal I, Evans CR, Scott G, Field RE. The Medial Rotation Knee replacement: Clinical and radiological results of a multi-centre surveillance study at five years. Knee. 2021 Jan;28:247-255. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2020.12.025. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
PMID: 33453513BACKGROUNDGlaser D, Lotke P. Cost-effectiveness of immediate postoperative radiographs after uncomplicated total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective and prospective study of 750 patients. J Arthroplasty. 2000 Jun;15(4):475-8. doi: 10.1054/arth.2000.4338.
PMID: 10884208BACKGROUNDHassan S, Wall A, Ayyaswamy B, Rogers S, Mills SP, Charalambous CP. Is there a need for early post-operative x-rays in primary total knee replacements? Experience of a centre in the UK. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2012 Apr;94(3):199-200. doi: 10.1308/003588412X13171221501780.
PMID: 22507727BACKGROUNDNovack TA, Patel JN, Koss J, Mazzei C, Harrington CJ, Wittig JC, Dundon J. Is There a Need for Recovery Room Radiographs Following Uncomplicated Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty? Cureus. 2021 Apr 18;13(4):e14544. doi: 10.7759/cureus.14544.
PMID: 34017659BACKGROUNDAljawder A, Alomran D, Alayyoub M, Alkhalifa F. Immediate Postoperative Portable Radiograph After Total Knee Replacements: A Necessity or a Burden? Open Orthop J. 2018 May 31;12:173-179. doi: 10.2174/1874325001812010173. eCollection 2018.
PMID: 29997704BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 27, 2023
First Posted
July 13, 2023
Study Start
January 20, 2022
Primary Completion
May 31, 2024
Study Completion
May 31, 2024
Last Updated
August 14, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share