Cognitive Behavioral Nursing Model
Clinical Value of Cognitive Behavioral Nursing Model to Patients With Congenital Glaucoma
1 other identifier
interventional
153
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Materials and Methods
- 1.General information This study enrolled 153 patients with congenital glaucoma who were treated at our hospital from January 2021 to December 2022. These patients were divided into an observation group (n = 76) and a control group (n = 77) using a random number table. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) meeting the diagnostic criteria for glaucoma, (2) following the attending doctor's recommendations to receive surgical treatment, and (3) volunteering to participate in the study. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) severe organic dysfunction, (2) cardiovascular and/or cerebrovascular diseases, (3) hypertension, (4) contraindications for surgery, (5) other eye diseases, (6) communication disorders, and (7) mental illnesses. Informed consent with signature was obtained from every participant, and the study has been approved by the hospital's ethics committee.
- 2.Research methods The control group was provided with routine care, including warm reception and provision of a quiet, clean, and well-ventilated ward environment for good rest. Patients were educated to broaden their knowledge of the disease and related surgical treatment, particularly the importance and outcomes of surgical treatment, thereby allaying their feeling of fear and boosting their confidence in recovery. Meanwhile, patients were encouraged to break their unhealthy habits, avoid bad diet choices, and take medications on time.
- 3.Statistical analysis The software SPSS22.0 was used for data analysis. Measurement data were expressed as "mean ± standard deviation (x±s)", and comparisons between the two groups were examined by the t-test. Enumeration data were represented as percentages (%) and inter-group comparisons were examined using the χ2 test. Significance was set at the level of P \<0.05.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2021
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 14, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 13, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2023
CompletedApril 24, 2024
April 1, 2024
2 years
June 14, 2023
April 22, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
SDS scores
The cutoff score for SAS is 50, with scores of 50-59 indicative of mild anxiety, 60-69 of moderate anxiety, and scores above 70 of severe anxiety.
before and at one month of nursing intervention
SAS scores
The cutoff score for SDS is 53, with scores of 53-62 standing for mild depression, 63-72 for moderate depression, and scores above 72 for severe depression.
before and at one month of nursing intervention
Psychological resilience
The level of psychological resilience was evaluated using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, which covers three dimensions: optimism, self-efficacy, and resilience, with the total score ranging from 0 to 100, and higher scores reflecting greater resilience.
Baseline (Before the intervention)
Patient compliance
The level of patient compliance during the perioperative period was assessed using an evaluation form that describes the level of compliance as complete compliance (compliance with all medical orders, surgical procedures, dietary guidelines, and schedule), partial compliance (occasional compliance with all medical orders, surgical procedures, dietary guidelines, and schedule), or noncompliance (failure to meet any of the above-mentioned criteria). The compliance rate (%) was calculated as (complete compliance + partial compliance) / total cases × 100%.
Immediately after nursing
Visual acuity (VA)
a higher VA value indicates better treatment outcomes
At 2 weeks of nursing intervention
IOP
a lower IOP values indicates better treatment outcomes
At 2 weeks of nursing intervention
mean deviation (MD)
a lower MD values indicates better treatment outcomes
At 2 weeks of nursing intervention
Study Arms (2)
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONObservation group
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
(1)Psychological intervention was accessible to those who felt resistant to their treatment plans or developed inferior feelings due to visual impairment to establish a good relationship with patients and help them better cope with unhealthy emotions. (2) Health education was provided through self-developed booklets and question-and-answer sessions to publicize the fundamental knowledge and make sure all patients have a full understanding of the disease and related treatments. (3) Dietary guidelines were set out to encourage a light, healthy diet with fruits and vegetables, free of irritating food, and containing a limited amount of oily food. (4) Behavioral guidelines were developed to address the importance of quitting tobacco use and prevent eye strain due to excessive eye use with tailored eye care plans.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- meeting the diagnostic criteria for glaucoma;
- following the attending doctor's recommendations to receive surgical treatment, and;
- volunteering to participate in the study
You may not qualify if:
- severe organic dysfunction;
- cardiovascular and/or cerebrovascular diseases;
- hypertension;
- contraindications for surgery;
- other eye diseases;
- communication disorders;
- mental illnesses
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Taiyuan Central hospital of Shanxi Medical University
Taiyuan, Shanxi, 030009, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 14, 2023
First Posted
July 13, 2023
Study Start
January 1, 2021
Primary Completion
December 31, 2022
Study Completion
December 31, 2023
Last Updated
April 24, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04